WolfErrant wrote:
JimmySeal wrote:
Not sure what you mean by straightforward. thi = てぃ doesn't seem straightforward or obvious to me, and having a consistent key for small characters seems, conversely, very straightforward.
I agree it's not obvious or even logical, but for me it beats "te-li". Maybe I'm wrong about this but ティ in my head sounds like "ti" not "te followed by little i". I go with the nearest approximation. I know I can type the various characters with various codes. I use "ltu" or "ltsu" whenever I need っ by itself. That's not a problem. But "thi", imperfect approximation that it is, flows better, just as for しゃ, "sha" seems to me faster than typing "shi-lya" or "si-xya" or whatever purely systematic variant.
I think there are two approaches, really. Either you follow a consistent, systematic method in which し is "si" or you try to approximate the actual sound, and use "shi". Both methods are valid, but the second seems, to me, more natural. Maybe I'm wrong about this and it hinders my pronunciation. I'm open to comments about that. Nonetheless I use both when needed. "du" for づ falls in the first category. "thi" for ティ seems ok for the second one. In the end, though, it's just a matter of being used to it so you're not slowed down when typing. Whatever works for you!
Don't know if someone responded to you yet or not, but in Mac you can set it to Romaji and HOLD "shift, control, ;" (without the " ") to get to English, "shift, control, j" to get to Hiragana, and "shift, control, k" to get to Katakana. Hope this helps!
PS - Under my language and text settings, I have the Kotoeri keyboard checked, with Hiragana, Katakana and Romaji checked. Full-width Romaji and half-width Katakana are not checked.