Has anybody here finished all core 2000 and 6000 decks ?

Index » General discussion

 
Reply #26 - 2012 April 13, 8:50 am
loverkanji Member
Registered: 2007-11-12 Posts: 112

Usually it doesn't take more that a few sentences to get the meaning of the word, the problem is that sometimes the sentences might contain other words that I don't know yet and if I add those sentences it becomes harder to learn, from my experience it's better to use the n+1 rule or be frustrated in the end, another problem is when I can't find a sentence with a translation.

Btw, what is this L1 and L2 that people mention ?

Reply #27 - 2012 April 13, 9:10 am
kainzero Member
From: Los Angeles Registered: 2009-08-31 Posts: 945

you could add the individual vocab words, and suspend the full sentence. then when you have reasonable knowledge of the vocab, you can unsuspend the full sentence.

i don't think anyone's a liar when they say they fully understand something. a lot of times they believe they understand it and then with some knowledge later, they can realize that they didn't fully understand it before.

Reply #28 - 2012 April 13, 2:01 pm
CerpinTaxt Member
From: America Registered: 2008-11-23 Posts: 85

loverkanji wrote:

Btw, what is this L1 and L2 that people mention ?

L1 = First Language, L2 = Second Language

Advertising (register and sign in to hide this)
JapanesePod101 Sponsor
 
Reply #29 - 2012 April 13, 5:29 pm
Apache Chief Member
Registered: 2011-02-04 Posts: 39

vix86 wrote:

...if you were to quiz people on the street by reading them a passage and then asking them to paraphrase the meaning; they'd get it. But if you then go back and define some word like "antipathy" they might go "erm um...its like.." Yet they just paraphrased a passage where it was used.

That totally reminds me of this one time I was hanging out with my friend and, to test me, he hands me this Magic card entirely in Japanese and tells me to read it. I took like a whole minute going over it, barely piecing things together, until I summarized what the card does almost exactly. I was annoyed at my lack of total comprehension, but he was impressed that I figured it out. In his eyes I had read and understood the whole thing. And I don't even play Magic.

Reply #30 - 2012 April 13, 7:37 pm
greatfool Member
Registered: 2009-05-12 Posts: 32

loverkanji wrote:

How then did some people use the AJATT method like katz' and do it in only 18 to 24 months ? Because from what I get it's just impossible.

It's definitely not impossible. But from what I gather from the AJATT site and my personal experience you have to make learning the language basically your number one priority and organize your life around that. I have done it for short periods of time like 3 months and seen the kind of progress than could get you close to fluency in 18 - 24 months.

If aren't the kind of person who gets home after a long day of school or work and thinks finally I can relax with some kanji for a few hours, then thats probably a good thing because it means you are a normal person with healthy balanced interests, but there are plenty of people out there that for some reason have a quirk of their personality that they love language and can find ways do it all the time.

To your original question I did Core6k, and I think that you'd need a little bit more than just the vocabulary, but Core6K + Reviewing the Kanji + Kanji Odyssey 2001 would put you in an excellent position to dive into any of that media and start making serious headway.

Though thats assuming you have knowledge of grammar from somewhere, but Japanese grammar is not that hard to pick up.

Last edited by greatfool (2012 April 13, 7:39 pm)

Reply #31 - 2012 April 13, 8:58 pm
Nagareboshi Member
From: Austria Registered: 2010-10-11 Posts: 569 Website

Tori-kun wrote:

I finished core6k and have learnt additionally about 4200 vocabularies I added with Rikai-chan up until now ever since January 2011. I cannot say I understand "almost everything" and what do you mean by understanding? Grasping single words, grammar and making sense of some sentences? Or understanding the whole plot line?

True understanding for me means that I get the finer point of a plot, the subtleties, and what the author left out, the implied meaning of sentences, and so on. This will come over time, for now I am happy when I understand large parts of something (whatever) in general.

Tori-kun wrote:

@Nagareboshi: It is greatly dependant on the type of anime you watch I think! Watch something like 'Arakawa under the Bridge' and you will be surprised how "bad" your Japanese is. The same counts for anime's that have a great amount of their own language like Naruto, Bleach or where there are longer dialogues (e.g. Detective Conan). I could understand 90% on the fly with the transcript, but not more. I hear occassional words, phrasings now, but that's about it. Anyway, just wondering how other users define their "understanding" or "not-understanding" when watching anime or shows.

Yes, the difficulty can vary greatly. From understanding very little, the general meaning, or almost everything without looking up words etc. It depends on the Anime, Show, Podcast, Drama, books, or websites.

For example in one Drama two housewifes were sitting around a table in the kitchen. They were talking about some thing or other, and one of started to talk about 粗大ごみ, which I thought was about large amounts of trash. Which is technically correct because that what the word means, but I wasn't aware of the other meaning, so it made little sense. The actual meaning was that she was ranting about her husband.

And I know what you mean by "bad" Japanese, which is a good indicator, that the material is too difficult right now. When I notice it, I come back to it some weeks later, and see if (whatever) has become easier. Meanwhile I keep sticking to other material that is a little less difficult but still above my level. My goal is to improve, and not to frustrate myself. Which would likely happen if I were to work with something very difficult, or way above my level, until my understanding of it reaches 100%. And considering the things I am reading, listening to, or watching at times, for instance 細胞生物学 which is cell biology (don't ask me why I read about such topics ... I don't know either :-D ) this would be a waste of time and effort. So first comes general understanding, and it will hopefully grow the more I actually learn on a broader basis. wink

Reply #32 - 2012 April 14, 2:59 am
thurd Member
From: Poland Registered: 2009-04-07 Posts: 756

I've done both, added vocab from JLPT 2-4, used some other lists and added quite a few words myself and there is no way in hell anyone at my level could say he "understands" Japanese. But there are people out there who would and that's why we have claims like "fluent in 24 months".

I can read simple stuff with only so many dictionary lookups that I don't get annoyed, I can finally use J-J explanations to help me understand a word better. It's not much but to me its a huge change, I can enjoy something while learning and not be discouraged by it, I just have to pick my battles (find easy native materials).

Edit: Perfect timing Nagareboshi, I've learned 細胞 yesterday smile @OP Its not in any of those Core decks so you might as well add it.

Last edited by thurd (2012 April 14, 3:07 am)

Reply #33 - 2012 April 14, 6:47 am
nadiatims Member
Registered: 2008-01-10 Posts: 1676

vix86 wrote:

So finishing the 6k will put you near a middle schooler in vocabulary probably, but you still won't be anywhere near an adult's vocabulary or whats needed for the N1.

I'd say a junior higher schooler would have at least double that actually. 6k is more likely what a five year old has.

Regarding how long it takes to reach fluency (can understand most text and speech and express themselves fairly freely accross a range of topics with a decent but not perfect accent), I'd say 2-3 years is pretty respectable time for some who's reasonably consistent, maybe 1-2 years if you're a little more hardcore about it or have some previous experience (are chinese or Korean). the claims of 6 months or less come from people that are happy to call themselves fluent as soon as they are able to string together some original utterances regardless of how natural they are (ie. know basic sentence order, a couple of tenses, the words 'but' and 'because'). I've been truly amazed by the low level of some people claiming to be fluent in Japanese. As far as I'm concerned fluency includes decent comprehension too, and you're not going to have that with a passive vocabulary of only 6k.

Reply #34 - 2012 April 14, 10:00 am
vix86 Member
From: Tokyo Registered: 2010-01-19 Posts: 1469

nadiatims wrote:

I'd say a junior higher schooler would have at least double that actually. 6k is more likely what a five year old has.

I think that's under estimating the level greatly. Were all the words spoken a 5 year old might be able to follow a lot of it, but there are still a lot of words in the Core6k that I really doubt a 5 year old know. I said JHS level because I can pick up a lot of the light novels that my students read and flip through and get in the range of 70-90% of the words on a page. It really depends on the publisher, but a lot of light novels are aimed at young adults.

The core6k will leave you with glaring holes in your vocabulary still, but I think it puts your reading/listening comprehensions higher than elementary school level at least.