i've been hearing about this for months, but after watching Khan Academy's video, it seems like a huge overreaction to me.
No, someone putting a comment with a link on your site to some other site with illegal content doesn't make your site liable. The bill states quite clearly that it's only if your site has limited to no purpose other than those types of links.
So no, youtube, flicker, etcetc can't be viewed that way, since they aren't dedicated primarily to sharing illegal content, or linking to that content.
Anyway, isn't it that they can only make the name not point to the site? They couldn't stop you going there if you had the numeric address, right? So in the worst case scenario, people would just share those, wouldn't they?
The internet is great, and i'd like it to remain as free as possible, but i hardly see it as being one of the biggest issues of our times...
rrrrrr must.stop.posting.here.must.read...
Last edited by IceCream (2012 January 18, 7:16 pm)