RECENT TOPICS » View all
Cranks wrote:
http://www.jlpt.jp/e/samples/forlearners.html
I tried the N3 sample questions since I thought that was about my level. I only got one wrong even though I had to rush through the "grammar" part as I didn't have the time to read all the texts fully. So it was easier than I thought and I could probably pass the N3 test. I'll try N2 when I have a little more time but I don't think I could pass it yet, at least not without studying specifically for the test.
Depends on what you mean by "learning Japanese." I think a lot of the ones crying "impossible" are RTK-minded people who think that learning thousands of kanji is a necessary step to learning Japanese. It isn't. You can be illiterate but still understand a language.
Given the right environment, study methods, and work ethic, 6 months might be sufficient to bring someone to a decent conversational level. You might not pass JLPT, but who really cares.
LucidFaia wrote:
Depends on what you mean by "learning Japanese." I think a lot of the ones crying "impossible" are RTK-minded people who think that learning thousands of kanji is a necessary step to learning Japanese. It isn't. You can be illiterate but still understand a language.
That's both obvious and NOT one the questions being posed.
OP wrote:
if it were possible to get to a high-level (let's say able to pass JLPT 1) within 3-6 months, how would such a study system look like?
Just the opposite. “People crying ‘impossible’” should be those who realize merely memorizing quantities of linguistic information isn't going to result in fluency, no matter how quickly you cram it or how you're defining fluency. Internalizing and structuring/associating that information, over time, will.
I also don't know of anyone on this forum who thinks memorizing 1000s of kanji beforehand is a requirement of ‘learning Japanese’.
Last edited by nest0r (2011 May 15, 8:17 am)
This guy learned a whole lot of Mandarin in 3 months. Not to C2 level, but to a fluent conversational level: http://www.fluentin3months.com/compare/
his level is laughable considering he was supposedly studying full time using methods he claims will quickly make you conversational. 5 minutes with a sympathetic non-native on a non-challeging topic, with bad accent and a lot of ums and ahs. Benny promotes himself as a kind of guru (sells an ebook etc) but these results are very unremarkable to put it mildly.
On the contrary I found the video fascinating. I've always heard of Benny and browsed his site a couple times in the past but never saw his videos. Of course he seems like an extremely extroverted guy from the get go so this isn't surprising, but I'm astonished he went ahead and had an interview with John Pasden three and a half months after beginning Mandarin. Incredibly ballsy to me. Pretty inspiring, actually.
matto wrote:
Could you learn Japanese in just 3-6 months?
Although I wish it were true, the simple and honest answer is:
NOPE! Not unless you are a genius!
Or...
YES! If you don't mind having HUGE holes in your linguistic ability, and don't mind aiming low!
I guess the answer depends on what your goals are...
If you are just looking to spit out a few memorized lines, then you should be OK.
seulggie wrote:
On the contrary I found the video fascinating. I've always heard of Benny and browsed his site a couple times in the past but never saw his videos. Of course he seems like an extremely extroverted guy from the get go so this isn't surprising, but I'm astonished he went ahead and had an interview with John Pasden three and a half months after beginning Mandarin. Incredibly ballsy to me. Pretty inspiring, actually.
i also think it was pretty impressive. He speaks better Mandarin after 3 months, with less long pauses for thought and generally faster speechrate than i do with japanese after 3 years, so he's probably doing something right. Sure, he's not going to be able to read books or watch tv programs, and probably has a quite limited vocab, but still. He can communicate. And that's the whole point of it for him.
It's a trade off, i guess. Perhaps you can have a higher vocab level, and better accent in 3 months, but almost certainly at the cost of speaking fluency.
nadiatims wrote:
his level is laughable considering he was supposedly studying full time using methods he claims will quickly make you conversational. 5 minutes with a sympathetic non-native on a non-challeging topic, with bad accent and a lot of ums and ahs. Benny promotes himself as a kind of guru (sells an ebook etc) but these results are very unremarkable to put it mildly.
Actually, Benny never claims that his "method" gets him fluent, but conversational. For lots of language learners conversation level is the main goal, yet many take a long time to do so(or never get there to begin with). He doesn't really promote himself as a guru so much as say that everyone can do what he does
. I guess the obviously SEO and attention-grabbing title helps discredit him, but past the title he says some pretty down-to-earth things.
Also, it's worth to note that he got his certification for some of the languages he's done. I guess a C2 in a European language isn't impressive these days, but at least it's proof that he does actually get to fluency with some of them.*
*worth mentioning that he outright states his method won't help jack with certification levels and that he was pretty open about having to study hard for them.
Last edited by Zgarbas (2012 April 25, 4:41 am)
seulggie wrote:
Incredibly ballsy to me. Pretty inspiring, actually.
It'd be more ballsy if he recorded a real chat with an actual native speaker about a topic other than language learning...
Remember, he went and lived in Taiwan for 3 months and studied full time. Giving a conservative estimate of 5 hours a day, that totals about 450 hours (5*30*3), with an emphasis on speaking. It's only impressive to the layman who knows zero mandarin and can't tell how poorly he's speaking. If he was lucky to average an hour a day, I'd say it's not bad for 3 months, but I think he spent significantly more time than that.
but where exactly would you expect someone to be after 3 months?
His speed of talking and general fluency in the conversation is pretty impressive, imo. Yeah, the conversation doesn't focus on anything too high minded, but it also seems that he has to combine different words and phrases to have that conversation, rather than repeat stock phrases... and the fact that he does that without having to pause to think much is great...
as I said for 3 months it's ok. Better than the typical anglophne expat english teacher's japanese after 3 months, but those people have jobs and/or other commitments or interests. Benny went to Taiwan to learn mandarin full time. 500 hours? 900 hours? who knows.
Yeah he doesn't have to pause much to think, but then his grammar isn't great, and it's not like chinese grammar is as alien to english speakers as Japanese is at first. A lot of the time ordering within a sentence is the same as english or close enough. Internalizing basic sentence ordering and learning to use a few words like 'but,' 'so,' 'when' and so on really isn't an achievement (it'd be in any beginner textbook). I'd be more interested in hearing his reply to a question like "Have you seen any good movies recently? Describe its plot for me." or "Describe your best friend's personality." or something. Basically anything that requires a little more thought and expression instead of just basic information about a topic he's bound to have discussed ad nauseam. Or his ability to understand someone else's reply to such a question.
@OP:
You seem to look at language from a very academic point of view. Have you ever learned to speak another language before? Speaking a language is not the same as knowing a list of words or memorizing characters. To speak a language, you’ll need enough speaking practice to acquire an active knowledge of both grammar and vocabulary. You’ll need the flexibility to formulate ideas, on the fly, using that knowledge and the linguistic habits you’ve created. It takes a lot of work, and quite frankly, few people pull it off.
If you’ve never studied another language, it’s unlikely you’d get anywhere decent with Japanese, or any other language for that matter, in 3 months.
It’s believed by many that for an English speaker to learn Japanese will take 3 to 4 times longer than it would to learn French or Spanish. The American Foreign Service Institute found this from teaching its diplomats (http://www.effectivelanguagelearning.co … difficulty). It also matches my experience. When I visit a Spanish conversation group, it’s full of people who can speak it, but when I visit a Japanese group, the only people who can have a decent conversation are those who lived in Japan.
So then the equivalent question would be – how far would you get with French or Spanish in under a month?
I did an experiment studying Finnish for 35 hours during a 30-day period. We limited the hours to what was feasible for us. 2 of us made it to A2 (high beginner), the level usually reached after a year in university. And we had both studied over a dozen languages before. We were evaluated, both in writing and in spoken, by a university professor. Japanese would likely have taken at least twice as long, so if we had ramped this up to 70 hours a month, after three months, we’d be at the B1 level perhaps, which would be low intermediate. However, I doubt we’d be having very interesting conversations. I’ve been studying Japanese for 3 years, and I can hold a decent conversation in Japanese, but that’s 3 years, not 3 months.
There is also the idea that you can't necessarily learn 4 times more in 4 hours than in one. There is a limit to how much one can absorb at once, and the faster you do it, the faster you forget it. And then there is the whole issue of actually being able to maintain that kind of regimen for that long.
In short, after 3 months of intensive study, you might reach the intermediate level at best. And that probably wouldn't mean being able to hold a conversation. What Benny did, he did spending entire days at it, living in the country, with teachers, and with a considerable language-learning experience behind him, and even then, we really don't know whether he studied before or not. And he's still low intermediate.
Last edited by AlexandreC (2012 April 25, 10:16 am)
nadiatims wrote:
as I said for 3 months it's ok. Better than the typical anglophne expat english teacher's japanese after 3 months, but those people have jobs and/or other commitments or interests. Benny went to Taiwan to learn mandarin full time. 500 hours? 900 hours? who knows.
Yeah he doesn't have to pause much to think, but then his grammar isn't great, and it's not like chinese grammar is as alien to english speakers as Japanese is at first. A lot of the time ordering within a sentence is the same as english or close enough. Internalizing basic sentence ordering and learning to use a few words like 'but,' 'so,' 'when' and so on really isn't an achievement (it'd be in any beginner textbook). I'd be more interested in hearing his reply to a question like "Have you seen any good movies recently? Describe its plot for me." or "Describe your best friend's personality." or something. Basically anything that requires a little more thought and expression instead of just basic information about a topic he's bound to have discussed ad nauseam. Or his ability to understand someone else's reply to such a question.
hmm, yeah, that's true, chinese sentence order did seem much easier than japanese, and i am pretty much comparing the english to japanese because i don't know chinese. So yeah, i have no clue how many mistakes he makes either.
I guess it probably is a topic he knows well enough, but i also think that whatever type of topic anyone chose he would prepare the vocabulary to cover. It didn't seem shiny enough to be rehearsed, though.
He's probably going to post more videos from china though, so i'm sure there'll be more. He probably does have enough to travel around happily though i imagine...
i wouldn't mind his job ![]()
As a mandarin learner, I was impressed by that video.
Definitely his vocabulary is pretty basic; to quantify it, my anki deck contains a little over 1000 words, and I could understand all of that (with chinese subs!). His vocab could be significantly lower - maybe 500 words or under. All grammar is at a beginner level.
Also his pronunciation is weird/broken at times; not sure about tones as I still can't hear them very well.
I think the point is, he has become fluent at speaking very fast. He's obviously internalized all the words and grammar points he knows, and can use them at full speed. It's all well and good to say he had 500+ hours to practise, but I don't think a language is that easy. In 3 months he can't have had that much exposure to the language passively, and (for me at least) it's not just 1hr study -> know it; everything takes a while to sink in. He must have constantly practise speaking from the start, but how does one do that when you know so few words?
I'm intrigued in his methods, but probably not enough to buy with his e-book.
On a side note, I wasn't sure which speaker was which at first. Benny speaks with a textbook Beijing mandarin accent, despite studying in Taiwan for 3 months. Then the guy on the left lives in China and his accent is nice, rounded, almost Taiwanese but without the slurring. Is that how Shanghai natives talk? Pretty cool.
Btw, this post shows him talking to a native speaker (though she uses lots of english):
http://www.fluentin3months.com/chinesepod/
Last edited by aphasiac (2012 April 25, 12:50 pm)
oh, btw, i forgot to add this in earlier. Some of those "fostering fluency in 2nd language learning" (http://forum.koohii.com/viewtopic.php?id=9680) studies did seem to suggest that a wider vocabulary leads to a loss of speaking fluency in some respects (in the short term, presumably). They suggested that it's because of cycling through more words and phrases to find what you want to say.
So, having a small vocabulary isn't actually bad for speaking fluency. Perhaps making sure you do use new vocabulary and phrases as soon as you learn them can also lessen this effect, i dunno?
Last edited by IceCream (2012 April 25, 11:11 am)
His Chinese is downright awful. To say he speaks "textbook Beijing Mandarin" is laughable. His pronunciation is terrible and his tones are all over the place (though admittedly a little better than in his previous video). He makes a ton of mistakes, which he conveniently glosses over in the English subtitles. In fact, it would be interesting for someone to try to sub it as he actually speaks.
One specific example I remember from when I watched it was "我自言自語...", which I believe he subbed as "I asked myself...". It actually means something more like "I spoke to myself". Yeah, you can maybe guess what he means from context, but let's be clear: he's not speaking Chinese, because Chinese people don't speak it like that. He claimed in the beginning that he would be able to converse with native speakers on pretty much any general topic, without them having to slow down for him and without them feeling like they're straining to understand him. He is a very, very long way from that goal.
I also have to agree, for the amount of study time he supposedly put in, his progress is pretty poor. At first I though, "well, it's only three months, so that's not so bad". But after seeing the math, I realized it's really nothing special. I'd go so far as to say it's below what he should have achieved in that time frame.
I've personally made much better progress since moving here. When I got here I had never had a conversation in Chinese, though I had a somewhat passable advanced-beginner level in reading and listening. This summer I'll be taking an advanced-level academic conversation class, and I'm also reading newspapers and novels in Chinese (with a dictionary, of course). Of course, I tried to tell Benny this a while back but he replied that I was too much of an "academic" or "linguist", which in his mind seems to mean "anyone who disagrees with my approach".
Anyway, just know that his Chinese is not as good as it may seem to someone who can't speak it. It's terrible. I don't doubt that if he kept at it, he could get pretty good in the language. But right now, he's not where he thinks he is, nor is he anywhere near where he claimed he would be.
Oh, the subtitles are hilarious! Talk about beautifying subtitles...
bflatnine wrote:
His Chinese is downright awful. To say he speaks "textbook Beijing Mandarin" is laughable.
Sorry I was talking about his accent (have edited my above post) - was not suggesting he makes no mistakes.
bflatnine wrote:
I've personally made much better progress since moving here. When I got here I had never had a conversation in Chinese, though I had a somewhat passable advanced-beginner level in reading and listening. This summer I'll be taking an advanced-level academic conversation class, and I'm also reading newspapers and novels in Chinese (with a dictionary, of course). Of course, I tried to tell Benny this a while back but he replied that I was too much of an "academic" or "linguist", which in his mind seems to mean "anyone who disagrees with my approach".
This statement is pretty meaningless without time frames! How long have you been in Taiwan? How many hours would you say you have actively studied?
Also (the big question), how was your conversation ability after three months?
The "academic" comment might be a reference to you studying mandarin at school (which i believe is that case from your previous posts) whilst he self-studies. I personally don't see any difference (a dedicated motivated full-time self-studier should easily be able to cover equal or more material than any student) but maybe he does?
Anyway I suppose I'm blown away when contrasting that video with most foreigners living here, and even more glaringly the Taiwanese and their English. Many of the older students at my cram school have been studying English 4-6 hours a week for 8 years (in a classroom, not including homework etc) yet they can barely string two sentences together. Compared to that, all this in 3 months seems like a miracle!
Last edited by aphasiac (2012 April 25, 12:54 pm)
I've been here 8 months now. I'm in my third quarter at MTC. My first quarter was mostly spent sleeping in and going out with friends, though I did study well for class, along with some material on the side. The second quarter I was more 認真 about it, and began earnestly studying other textbooks outside of class. I was able to skip two levels of class at MTC, and I'll likely be able to skip another after this term. If you're familiar with the PAVC series used everywhere in Taiwan, I started near the beginning of Book 2, skipped Book 4 and Far East Book 3 (which MTC places after PAVC 4), and am taking a radio plays class this term. Next term I will most likely be taking 思想與社會, which is an advanced book focusing on academic Chinese in which you're expected to be able to converse and write intelligently on things like Confucianism's influence on modern Chinese society, or health problems brought about by modernization.
My conversational ability after three months was better than his, no doubt about it. My pronunciation and tones were miles beyond his, which makes it MUCH easier for people to understand what I'm saying. After a month of class, I remember going out with my classmates and spending the entire night speaking in Chinese about things like drug use in the US vs Japan. Sure, we had to use a lot of circumlocution ("crack" is like a white drug rock that you put in a thing, light it on fire, and breathe the smoke...etc.), but this is, IMO, a better indicator of language ability than talking about language learning for a few minutes. You're learning a language – of course you're going to be able to talk about language learning after three months of doing so.
I won't try to guess at his motivations for saying the things he said (I've done that plenty elsewhere). I agree in theory that a motivated student can cover more ground than someone who is studying at a school and only does the minimum requirement. But IMO the latter person is wasting their time. Moreover, that "in theory" doesn't pan out in real life very often. Yes, I've learned a lot more on my own than I have in class. But it's really easy to slack off, too. The class at least sets a minimum pace for how much I have to study, and then I can pile on the extra stuff on the side.
Anyway, you can't compare him to "most foreigners living here". Most foreigners here don't come for the express purpose of learning Chinese. Those who do are often not especially motivated (aside from those at ICLP). He came here to show how much he could learn in 3 months of full-time study. If I remember correctly, he spent only 2 hours per day in English, and the rest was all Chinese (all the time?). His results, for that amount of time invested, are underwhelming.
Don't even get me started on how Taiwanese people are taught English. It's about as backwards as you can get, and as a result I have to spend a lot of time undoing the damage caused by this "system" when I tutor people. My students have actually told me that they see letters in their head when they hear English, and that if what they hear doesn't cause the letters to form a word, they don't understand it. I'm frequently asked to spell a word I've used, and only then do they understand what I'm saying. That's often because they've learned and cemented wrong pronunciations, so they don't understand the correct pronunciation. But they're masters of memorizing huge amounts of vocabulary, as long as it's on paper, and you don't ask them to use it in a sentence. None of this is the student's fault, of course, and I'm very patient in correcting it.
But that's neither here nor there. The important point is, don't get suckered by Benny. If you had nothing but free time to study and practice, and access to tutors for a few hours per day for 3 months, and were diligent about it, I'd be disappointed if you didn't make better progress than he did.
Sorry I was talking about his accent (have edited my above post) - was not suggesting he makes no mistakes.
I was also talking about his accent there, which includes pronunciation and tones. His accent is terrible. Has he improved? Sure. But he's far from having "textbook" anything.
I can't comment on the quality of his Chinese, but even if everything Bflatline says is correct (and it does sound like they know what they're talking about), I still think the video's pretty impressive. His language may be ugly but he's able to express himself at a reasonable pace in a manner that seems both relaxed and enthusiastic. Isn't that a huge achievement after just 3 months?
I think the comment about being too much of an academic was referring to the different way in which he views language. To Bflatline it was a mistake to say 我自言自語, but I think Benny would view that as a success because he managed to talk around the hole in his knowledge and express what he wanted to. Obviously he'll need to learn that later, and the correct word/phrase would definitely have been preferable, but he did manage to say what he wanted to say, so that's a win. ![]()
I have to say that I agree with him on this. I happen to know a Chinese woman who's been living in England since before I was born. Her grammar is awful and sometimes her word choices are decidedly odd, but she's almost always able to express herself without difficulty, and the cheerful, confident way in which she speaks makes her far more pleasant to speak to than a lot of the English people I know.
I'm sure Benny's Chinese isn't nearly as good as her English, but the fact that there are lots of mistakes in that video actually reassure me that what he writes on his site is genuine. He really does start speaking straight away, he doesn't wait till he's good enough before doing X, and this approach does result in him being able to communicate better than his knowledge of the language would normally allow.
P.s. lol What's this about him having all day to study while other people have to work? He's a freelance translator not a drifter. Orz
Last edited by Splatted (2012 April 25, 1:51 pm)
I'm always fascinated by how whenever someone stands out as a language learner the language learning communities' first instinct is to criticize/underappreciate/outright insult that said person for not being a language-learning superman. Why is that? Is it because they get the spotlight? Because they make money out of it? E-Penis?
(genuine curiosity)
Maybe he just got tired of answering constant redundant questions about how he did it from people that didn't feel like reading the blog to find out. With a book you can just say, "hey there's a book".

