RECENT TOPICS » View all
From showing up in forum posts, I should add.
It serves no purpose but to show how big your e-dick is. Somebody's credibility shouldn't be determined by a post count or registration date.
Removing this from displaying in forum posts will allow users to judge a post by it's content, not by how long a member has been around or how many posts he or she has made.
Are you OCD or something?
DONT DISS TWILIGHT
TWILIGHT SERIES IS A GOOD BOOK SERIOUS TO READ
AND 'MOON'? I DIDNT HEARZ OF A MOVIE CALLED MOON, THE NEW TWILIGHT MOVIE IS CALLED *NEW* MOON YOU NEWB WHO IS DUNCAN JONES YOU NEWB? WTACH NEW MOON
GOOD SERIS
BTW NARUTO IS THE BEST
ruiner wrote:
Are you OCD or something?
Explain.
samesong, I get what you're saying, but I don't think it really matters whether or not you can see date of registration or post count in posts. I really think most people here judge posts based on their content, not based on who wrote them. And anyways, even if these were removed from showing up in forum posts, people know who's been around for a while and who posts a lot. Plus, it just takes one click to see a user's profile. So really, although I can see where you're coming from, I just don't think this matters, although I couldn't care less either way whether they stay or go.
Profile name and avatar as well. Let's examine each post based on the information presented unfiltered by our pre-judgement of how lame that user's posts have been in the past. (my avatar has an impressive e-dick don't you think?)
I wouldn't have given it a second though either, but for the past few months I have been posting in a different forum where they remove both of these things, and the end result is allowing newer users to feel less intimated about expressing their opinions.
Of course there are some users that will always stand out from the rest because of their commitment to posting in some forums, but for the rest, they are pretty unknown.
As a new member, you don't feel the pressure of feeling like a "newb", and thus not being able to express your opinion as freely. Of course post count and registration date are still only a click away, but the important thing is that they aren't read first before the post itself.
In real life it's the equivalent of having to state your age and how long you have been in an organization before getting to your point.
Last edited by samesong (2009 November 20, 10:48 pm)
Gee.. I've never even noticed the post count and date thing until you pointed it out. Nor have I ever seen anyone use that to proclaim that their opinion is more superior in an argument.
I get this vibe that a lot of people who frequent these forums are young... err.. maybe just lacking in maturity sometimes... not that I think it's very bad to have a wide range of different people in one forum to offer different (albeit not always productive or pleasant) viewpoints on things.
samesong wrote:
Somebody's credibility shouldn't be determined by a post count or registration date.
samesong wrote:
the important thing is that they aren't read first before the post itself.
I agree. But I also think it's not difficult at all to ignore the unimportant data written in tiny print on a separate place from the post content...
So, why are you reading those numbers on the left column? To me, it sounds like you're saying racism is bad so we should hide our skin colors.
Silence, n00b. Come back and tell Fabrice how to run his forum after you've been here another year or so, and posted more.
PS - "e-dick", really? Kind of vulgar. Are you actually liosama?? ^_^
Last edited by nest0r (2009 November 20, 11:01 pm)
magamo wrote:
I agree. But I also think it's not difficult at all to ignore the unimportant data written in tiny print on a separate place from the post content...
Why ignore it when it can simply be hidden? And as happy as I am to see so many people think that that number is unimportant, it still is factored in when assessing a post's quality.
So, why are you reading those numbers on the left column? To me, it sounds like you're saying racism is bad so we should hide our skin colors.
I'm not the only one reading those numbers
.
I'm talking about seniority, not skin color.
Last edited by samesong (2009 November 20, 11:09 pm)
nest0r wrote:
Silence, n00b. Come back and tell Fabrice how to run his forum after you've been here another year or so, and posted more.
PS - "e-dick", really? Kind of vulgar. Are you actually liosama?? ^_^
I knew I shoulda waited another year to post this! Maybe I'll try again next year.
Really? I never found e-dick offensive. I always thought of it as just a term for showing off how much technological know-how and experience you have. Girls can have e-dicks too ![]()
Although I agree with you samgsong find me an example where someone has criticized another based on their post count/join date.
Only one or two stupid threads made by people with a post count or two were assumed to be trolls, but that was about it. It's quite obvious which members of this forum provide really helpful and informative feedback, you're bringing this discussion up out of nowhere.
liosama wrote:
Although I agree with you samesong find me an example where someone has criticized another based on their post count/join date.
I've never ran into one, which is why I'm glad to be a part of this community
.
But when you see somebody with a post count that extends to four digits, compared to somebody that has only posted a handful of times, what they say will be viewed differently.
People know who the veterans with high post counts are by name, so I don't think it makes a difference. We'd have to become an anon board, and then we'd just be full of trolls.
No I disagree, many of the guys who have large post counts actually know a lot of things and likewise ones who don't have large post counts (Yes I actually had to go check up some names e.g ruiner ~300) which goes to show that I don't even check post counts, who are very bright and well read and they raise really good arguments.
And I know the guys/girls I chat to on irc are bright too. But you still aren't giving me an example
.
Regardless, wherever one goes they are subject to fear of expressing their opinion when they join clubs or what not, is mostly a problem they have to deal with by themselves. Sometimes a club can be kind towards new people or just indifferent which is a good thing, because then it's up to the individual to voice their thoughts and opinions and they'll be respected there on by how useful their input is on any given topic. Other societies follow authoritarian/bureaucratic models but they will never get anywhere cause they are too busy sucking each other off, which as you said is not this forum. (Sorry was that too vulgar nest0r/oracle?)
liosama wrote:
No I disagree, many of the guys who have large post counts actually know a lot of things and likewise ones who don't have large post counts
Exactly. But you aren't going to know this unless you've been around for a while and are familiar with the posters.
Let me ask this question then:
Why are post count and registration date visible? What purpose does it serve?
Last edited by samesong (2009 November 21, 12:01 am)
samesong wrote:
Why ignore it when it can simply be hidden?
Um, I was asking "Why hide it when it can simply be ignored?" It's not like RTK is having the "e-dick" problem you speak of.
Usually normal people don't bother to read what they think is unimportant. Some people don't even notice. Even if you read, you don't think it has anything to do with the quality of posts, do you?
I don't particularly disagree with your idea, but if you can't help but read the dates/post counts and claim they be hidden when no one is taking the little numbers seriously on this forum, you might sound like you're one of the rare guys who believe they're related to posters' credibility.
If it was causing trouble, ファブリス would do something.
By the way, if you feel the pressure of being a "newb" and are too intimidated because of the numbers, you might be the kind of person who is taking the unimportant numbers too seriously. I know everyone feels a little pressure when they join a new community, but I don't think it's due to post counts and whatnot.
samesong wrote:
But when you see somebody with a post count that extends to four digits, compared to somebody that has only posted a handful of times, what they say will be viewed differently.
I don't compare post counts between posters. Do you? If so, why?
Edit:
samesong wrote:
Let me ask this question then:
Why are post count and registration date visible? What purpose does it serve?
Because this is a place for Japanese learners, and seniority is important in the Japanese culture, I guess.
Last edited by magamo (2009 November 21, 12:05 am)
magamo wrote:
samesong wrote:
you might sound like you're one of the rare guys who believe they're related to posters' credibility.
lol this is exactly what I'm against, thus the point of this topic.
By the way, if you feel the pressure of being a "newb" and are too intimidated because of the numbers,
i've been around for a good while. ![]()
samesong wrote:
Let me ask this question then:
Why are post count and registration date visible? What purpose does it serve?Because this is a place for learning Japanese, and seniority is important in the Japanese culture, I guess.
that's silly.
Last edited by samesong (2009 November 21, 12:06 am)
samesong wrote:
Let me ask this question then:
Why are post count and registration date visible? What purpose does it serve?
I often make use of those figures when deciding what to include in replies. For example, basic information about the RTK method and this website might be useful to a newcomer but not needed by longer-term members.
samesong wrote:
liosama wrote:
Although I agree with you samesong find me an example where someone has criticized another based on their post count/join date.
I've never ran into one, which is why I'm glad to be a part of this community
.
You've agreed that the credibility/"e-dick" argument is a non-issue here, so it seems like your main concern is that "newbs" will be reluctant to post here, right?
liosama wrote:
Regardless, wherever one goes they are subject to fear of expressing their opinion when they join clubs or what not, is mostly a problem they have to deal with by themselves. Sometimes a club can be kind towards new people or just indifferent which is a good thing, because then it's up to the individual to voice their thoughts and opinions and they'll be respected there on by how useful their input is on any given topic. Other societies follow authoritarian/bureaucratic models but they will never get anywhere cause they are too busy sucking each other off, which as you said is not this forum. (Sorry was that too vulgar nest0r/oracle?)
Exactly. This is basic human psychology, not a problem with the setup of this forum. This forum seems to be very welcoming to new members, so I think this is a non-issue, too.
samesong wrote:
Why ignore it when it can simply be hidden?
Maybe the best "solution" (edit: I put this in quotation marks because I don't actually think there's any problem with how things are now) would be to compromise and have an option to show or hide these data. That way, each user could choose for themselves whether it should show up or not.
Exactly. But you aren't going to know this unless you've been around for a while and are familiar with the posters.
This isn't necessarily true, because some users, like me, lurked for a long time before they registered or started posting. Even more of a reason why it doesn't really make any sense to pay too much attention to post count or registration date.
Let me ask this question then:
Why are post count and registration date visible? What purpose does it serve?
I don't really know. magamo's speculation that it's based on the importance of seniority in Japanese culture is interesting, but I kind of doubt that's the reason. It seems more like it's just really widespread. It's the norm in most forums I've seen. Basically, it's not something, like you said, that most people would give a second thought to.
Last edited by shirokuro (2009 November 21, 12:37 am)
My philosophy is, don't worry about it unless it becomes an issue. Fabrice has his own views already on content > profile info, if he felt like changing it or that the forum was the worse off for it (which isn't the case, people either ignore it or find it useful, from what I've seen), he would do so whenever he got around to it.
That said, philosophically/generally speaking, I'm also looking forward to how this sort of thing develops online in the future, re: reputation systems, anonymity and behaviour dependent on or independent of accountability, et cetera. What did Cory Doctorow call it, "Whuffie"? That's not a bad idea, but personally I have a different vision...
Last edited by nest0r (2009 November 21, 12:20 am)
*Posts for no reason other than to see number of posts.*
I move that avatars be removed as well. Katsuo's avatar has me shaken in particular, and there no way I can match the sheer beauty of liosamas.
Woe is me!
PS - An example of how I use the profile info: The number of posts adversely affects their coolness factor, dependent on much it exceeds the tacit norm based on when they joined. Ex: Kazelee joined after I did, but their post count exceeds my own. Thus, they are considerably less cool than I am. This being proportionate to how much later they joined, and how many posts they have. It's a complex mathematical calculation I've learned to do swiftly in my head.
Last edited by nest0r (2009 November 21, 12:28 am)
nest0r wrote:
PS - An example of how I use the profile info: The number of posts adversely affects their coolness factor, dependent on much it exceeds the tacit norm based on when they joined. Ex: Kazelee joined after I did, but their post count exceeds my own. Thus, they are considerably less cool than I am.
Interesting.
See, the way I see it is that post count is a directly related to study time and [ removed by moderator. Reason: ....Damn! ]
BTW, kudos on the use of "their." It's glad to see someone recognizing both me and my alter ego.

