Any 'advanced' learners care to review this? I know a few people must have bought it by now... does it fill gaps in your resources in regards to advanced grammar? I'm wondering if, by the time I consider myself advanced, I'd even want to read English explanations of Japanese grammar. Or is it not so advanced...
http://www.thejapanshop.com/product.php?productid=17380
Last edited by nest0r (2009 January 11, 8:23 pm)
EnjukuBlack
Member
From: 泉州
Registered: 2009-01-11
Posts: 108
I know what you're saying. I bought and wore out my copies of the Basic and Intermediate books, and as I started getting more advanced, was always wishing they would come out with an Advanced version.
But then I was in Junkudo bookstore in Nanba just this past summer and saw the Advanced version on the shelf. And I thought "Hey, finally!"
But then I ended up not buying it. I didn't even look inside it, to be honest. The reason being - I don't really systematically study Japanese anymore. I'm sure there are some patterns in there that I don't know, but these days I live and work almost completely in Japanese (forums like this are a rare chance for me to use English!). I speak with clients, attend company meetings, read/write letters and business memos - all in Japanese. I just didn't see the need to spend 4,000 yen on a grammar book I probably wouldn't have time to open and look at.
I guess it would be a useful buy for advanced speakers who are not living in Japan. Or perhaps for people who are studying to take JLPT1. Other than that, I think you may have the same experience as me.
Nowadays, when I have time to sit down and study Japanese, it's to focus on my kanji retention/writing ability.
Makes sense to me. Another possibility is that perhaps the grammar concepts are only subjectively 'advanced', that is, someone at a generally 'intermediate' level could do them without worring about tackling too much new information.
The book is soft cover (according to that site), I'm not sure I'd ever spend $50+ on a soft cover book.
Last edited by nest0r (2009 January 11, 10:32 pm)