RECENT TOPICS » View all
I know that the entire RtK method revolves around the stories which you assign to a kanji, but are they really that crucial? I am only at about 300, but I hardly even glance at the stories in most cases. Is it only this easy because I am still in the lower numbers, or do many people tend to do this? I don't want to screw myself over later when I've not developed the skills needed to survive in the later kanji. I have been going at a rate of about 50/day, and my recall rate is almost 100%, I'm sure.
So, do any of you remember the kanji without the use of mnemonics and whatnot?
Are you making stories and then not looking at them, or just copying kanji for rote? There is a difference.
Last edited by alyks (2008 July 27, 4:17 pm)
I'm not using stories at all. I tend to just look at a new kanji, say to myself, "Ok, that means..." and I am set. It just seems like it would be a huge waste of time to make and memorize stories if it isn't entirely necessary.
Well I've found I have a pretty good ability to remember kanji I've never seen just by studying the components. I see kanji in Japanese media that I don't know what it means, but I can usually remember it for a while if I want to look it up. This is because I don't see 的, for example, but rather "A drop of sun, a bound up drop" in my head. I imagine a person could get pretty far with just knowing the components + SRS.
However, there is an immense benefit to knowing stories. If I were you I would reconsider the approach you're taking. I don't think it's a problem to memorize the mnemonics. I'm sure other members here will explain how they're not much of a burden, how they fade away, etc.
You may be strange. It depends on how good you are at remembering things. Some people are better than others. Most people find that if they don't use the mnemonics, they will start to suffer as the number of kanji gets higher and higher-- your brain gets too cluttered with kanji, and you start getting them confused.
What your success rate is for the 3rd and 4th pile is really the key to finding out if it what you're doing is working for you or not. Remembering something 3-5 days out is easy. It's remembering it 2 months from now that's tricky. By then you will have seen hundreds more kanji.
You don't need to be too complex with stories-- you just need a hook to distinguish one kanji from another. You'll probably start running into problems when you start seeing kanji with similar-sounding or similar-meaning keywords. That's when stories/images will help a LOT.
EDIT: Once you finish and start studying actual readings, you won't see 的 as anything other than ~てき. All of the Heisig stuff will sort of fade away over time as you replace keywords with real words.
Last edited by rich_f (2008 July 27, 4:40 pm)
300 at 50/day, you have been doing this for 6 days correct?
Look at the early kanji and pay attention to how you do on the complicated ones (one's like the Dr. kanji might be a good candidate). Your success may be a combination of 1) the early kanji are fairly simple and 2) you have been doing this for six days.
If you do finish this and keep reviewing, you will get to the point where you won't review a card for a year or more. Stories (and images, using your imaginative memory) are what will build strong associations in your mind between the kanji, its writing, and its keyword. I doubt that you will be able to keep the really complicated kanji in your memory with the ease you have been experiencing.
In short: I suggest becoming used to using stories and making good images in your head.
Due to the simplicity of the earlier kanji, it's fairly easy to simply memorize them visually, especially if you're using any kind of SRS system to boost your retention rates. However, just because it's possible to do so, doesn't mean it should be done. The early kanji are meant to be used as a stepping stone into the method, a way to get your imaginative memory and ability to deconstruct kanji by primitives up to par so that you can tackle later, more complex kanji with relative ease. You may see it as a waste of time now, but it's really a way of saving time down the line, which is what the Heisig method is all about. ![]()
Plus, it doesn't help that most people's ability to retain kanji the way you're doing it tends to run dry after the first few hundred.
At least personally I've found stories tremendously helpful for kanji that have multiple components. Take 類 and 数. I learned these the traditional way before really getting through Heisig, and I had a very hard time remembering which was which. Most of the times I'd end up with some combination of the two when I tried to write one out.
I also had issues where I'd read lookalike characters wrong, or write out the wrong lookalike character. Like 問 vs 間. Do you want 質問 or 質間? Granted this isn't a problem if you really remember kanji->keyword with 100% accuracy, but I had issues keeping those types of characters apart. With a good story they become much, much harder to confuse.
Perhaps I could just make stories for those kanji I may find challenging. I think I'll test the waters here for a bit and see how long it takes for my retention rates to suffer, if they do at all. My memory is by no means photographic, but I think I am a more visual learner. Scout, you mentioned that you use stories for the ones which give you a hard time. Do you have stories for the others as well? I was really looking for some sort of success story, just to see if people with a similar technique (or lack thereof) have ever gotten past the first few hundred. And I realize I have only been at it for a few days, so I guess I can't start tooting my own horn quite yet.
And to rich_f: "You may be strange" made me giggle.
I think it will kick in after a while, you won't notice it at all now, but i guess its up to you in the end anyway. Since the whole point is to see what works and what doesn't.
I have stories for basically everything other than a few of the low-numbered kanji. Actually, as time goes on I'm going back and adding stories for everything I get wrong. Who would have ever thought I'd get "seven" wrong? That happened when I had about a 240 day interval. So now I have a story for that too.
I decided to add stories for everything after I realized just how easily I could forget kanji. Take something like 猫. There were times in Japanese 202 where I wrote it maybe 30 times a week for 2-3 weeks. It's such a 'simple' kanji and I wrote it so often ... so you can imagine my utter surprise when two lessons later (~4-5 weeks later) I went to write it and my mind was just blank. There was nothing there. While I occasionally forget which keyword is for the kanji I need, or mix up kanji usage (is it 連れる 運れる?) I found that the work of making stories was definitely still worth it.
Running into issues like not being able to pick between 連れる and 運れる made me go on an 18 month hiatus from Heisig (I stopped after ~450). It finally took stuff like the 猫 issues for me to realize that Heisig may not be perfect, but there were a lot of places where it could help me. I also realized that just trying to remember the components that went into a character with a brute-force approach wasn't very useful. The pack of wild dogs makes sense for 猫, but other than a story or your visual memory how would you remember the right side of the character?
More than anything, I think it's important for you to experiment on your own and find out what really works for you long term. It was only by realizing in the end just how much I really needed a system like Heisig that I was able to get myself through the last 3/4 of the book.
Your not going to need Stories for every single Kanji. Some will just stick, many wont. Some will be so abstract and unrelated that it will be easier to just rote memorize the kanji and drill it into your head. But for the most part when the Kanji get more complex your going to want these stories. There are going to be so many Kanji floating around in your head it will probably get confusing, especially when the english meaning for many of them are synonyms. I think you will find the power of imagery to be so much greater than rote memorization saving you so much time in the future. Just one example for me is the kanji for dragon. I am never going to forget the image of me giving him a vase (primitive) full of eel (primitive) so he doesnt eat me. If you asked me in a year what the kanji for dragon was with out this I might not be able to tell you. Heisig along with AJATT rests on the principle that extra work and time in the beginning will pay off exorbitantly in the future. So even though you dont see an immediate pay off for the extra effort of using stories, you will be thanking the heavens that you did later on. Everyone is different and you will feel out the best method for you, just dont dismiss the stories straight off the bat for you might regret it later and have to learn the hard way. And be careful not to rush through the book for the sake of finishing. You want it to stick.
scout wrote:
Running into issues like not being able to pick between 連れる and 運れる made me go on an 18 month hiatus from Heisig (I stopped after ~450). It finally took stuff like the 猫 issues for me to realize that Heisig may not be perfect, but there were a lot of places where it could help me. I also realized that just trying to remember the components that went into a character with a brute-force approach wasn't very useful. The pack of wild dogs makes sense for 猫, but other than a story or your visual memory how would you remember the right side of the character?



Anyways, it works better to take the left primitive as any furry animal, and not just dogs. Too restrictive primitives make for worse stories.
Last edited by DrJones (2008 July 27, 5:49 pm)
I guess the definition of "story" also depends on the person. A lot of my best stories are still scenes with various real-world objects in them. For primitives like tremendous and straightaway I even used physical motions.
One that comes to mind is neglect (怠) which is a mental movie of a still scene. We're looking at a 表彰台(ひょうしょうだい/the three-tiered podium seen in sporing events for the medalists) and we slowly pan down until low and behold there is a physical heart lying on the ground underneath that's been neglected. The podium itself is a little scene where the medalists are standing on the podium and the person on the highest level elbows the person next to them in the mouth.
For me a lot of it was getting away from strokes and going to real-world objects which could be assembled in a way that was memorable. This gets harder with non-physical primitives. Sometimes I'd break them apart into physial objects or try to find a mnemonic or a bit of word-play to help.
Last edited by scout (2008 July 27, 6:32 pm)
The_Dude wrote:
Perhaps I could just make stories for those kanji I may find challenging. I think I'll test the waters here for a bit and see how long it takes for my retention rates to suffer, if they do at all. My memory is by no means photographic, but I think I am a more visual learner. Scout, you mentioned that you use stories for the ones which give you a hard time. Do you have stories for the others as well? I was really looking for some sort of success story, just to see if people with a similar technique (or lack thereof) have ever gotten past the first few hundred. And I realize I have only been at it for a few days, so I guess I can't start tooting my own horn quite yet.
And to rich_f: "You may be strange" made me giggle.
If you only make stories for kanji you have trouble with, you'll soon discover that memorizing those stories without the others is all but impossible. The reason Heisig's method works as well as it does is because you build your house of cards on top of all the other work you've done, strengthening previous connections even as you work your way through the more complicated kanji. Even if you lose a card here and there, the whole house remains stable.
I mean, how are you going to construct a story for 微 or 憂 if you never constructed stories for 頭 or 受 or 元? How do you plan to remember the elements that make up your future stories if you never studied those elements in the first place?
Why do I need to use earlier stories in those I invent for the later ones? For instance, using the story for 心 when making one up for 憂 wouldn't be at all useful. Would I not just use the word heart?
I'm going to get into the 500s today, and my rates still are not suffering. And for a few of the kanji I've put into the system, I have actually started to use stories without ever having made them up. I guess a better word for it would be I'm *receiving* the stories. While I feel good about how well I have the kinji which are sans story memorized, the ones with stories I don't think I could ever forget. I heard the word apricot the other day, and it summoned the mental movie of some fool diving past the lower branches of a tree and biting off the fruit. Likewise, when I hear circumference, I always think of Crocker (with a silly hat on) rolled up in a giant length of measuring tape, and rolling through a full pipe, leaving the tape behind him.
Edit: typo
Edit again: Another good example is 落. You can't help but make a "story" for that one, because when the primitives are read in order it makes a sentence! Flowers need water or each will fall.
Last edited by The_Dude (2008 July 29, 7:10 am)
Rather than making a new thread, I thought I'd just ask this here.
When practicing your writing, what medium do you use? The lines in my college ruled notebook are too small! Should I learn to write smaller, or switch to regular ruled? Or maybe I should use printer paper?
Gah!
I just use printer paper most of the time. I don't think the kanji size is nearly as important as proportion of primitives to one another and general visual aesthetics. The main advantage I see to writing smaller is that you save more paper in the long run.
Yo The_Dude,
I'd follow advices from people here. In the beggining the kanji are very simple and are not confusing at all. In the later part of RTK, things start to get mucky. Stories are one way to get out of the mud.
Of course rote memorization works, it is just painful.
Even if you do well with rote memorization, your memory with the stories would be even better.
Remember: The point here is not going trought the whole book as fast as possible, but to retain all of it as fast as possible.
Thanks for the input, mentat. I read parts of your little blog the other day. Have you finished getting all of your flashcards in yet?
And time is a huge issue for me. I would like to be pretty far by mid December. I'm applying for an exchange trip (again...), and I think I could really wow the interviewers If I knew a significant number of readings by then, so I'm just trying to get through the basics quickly. Everything I learn now will just be reinforced later anywho. At this rate, I'll be done with RTK before school starts, which is a woohoo kind of deal.If I ever want to go on an exchange, 09-10 has to be the year for me. It's my senior year at high school. -.-
You can either use printer paper, or just double up the college lines. Might make it a little easier that way. Heck, triple them up if you have to. I usually use printer paper and a brush pen I bought in Japan, because I like to. For drilling readings/sentences, I just use a cheap notebook with regular spacing on it and a mechanical pencil. (I learned early on it's insane to try to practice writing Japanese sentenecs in pen. I only use a brush pen for individual kanji practice. That way, I waste less paper.)
Ah! A pencil... That didn't even occur to me. That should make things much easier to handle, as it's only a few like 曇 or other really tall ones that give me trouble. A pencil should do the job nicely.
On the subject of student exchanges, have many of you been on one? If I'm accepted, I'll be living in Japan for an entire year! RYE doesn't even release the application forms until August, but I'm already so excited.
Pen choice was covered in these two threads a while back, and a little about paper too:
http://forum.koohii.com/viewtopic.php?id=969
http://forum.koohii.com/viewtopic.php?id=1344
(I was writing out my opinions and got the feeling I'd already said this somewhere, and sure enough when I searched there it was, in the second thread). Something with a very fine line and completely reliable flow, is my recommendation -- mechanical pencil or ultrafine nib gel rollerball.
Thanks for the info. Most pens are way out of the question for me, being a southpaw. The ink from gel pens everyone recommends just winds up all over my arm... I always write with an RSVP, because it's fun to spin
. I guess I'll just have to learn to do it with a pencil.
I usually do all of my reviews in a notebook of graph paper with a 0.5mm mechanical pencil, like so:
http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u251 … ure005.jpg
The graph paper has helped balance my characters, while the pencil makes it easy to write in small spaces with more detail, while at the same time not running, smudging or bleeding through onto other pages. Plus, it's easy to correct mistakes.

