Some really helpful primitives have been:
人 - Stryder's idea to use Dwight Schrute from 'The Office." That has really helped in many kanji (though perhaps it's kind of an obscure reference for people who don't watch the show.) When Dwight doesn't fit in, Mr. T seems to work wonders. In a way, I use both Dwight and Mr. T as the primitive. Between these two, I can pretty much find/make up stories for a whole lot of these kanji. One might think "Hey, using two dudes for one primitive can get confusing," but it's not confusing at all, really. (It would be confusing to use one character for two different primitives, though.) If I hear "Dwight" or "Mr. T," I always know what primitive to write. This happens a lot in RTK, I've noticed. Oftentimes I'll think up a new primitive and use it interchangeably with the one from the book.
糸 - Whoever thought of Spider-Man for this one is a genius, and whoever thought of using Venom as an alternate primitive when it occurs below a kanji is also a genius.
講 - For the right side of this one, I have begun using Riccardo's suggestion of Hannibal "Lecture." (See #1816). I don't really understand why the original primitive was chosen, and Hannibal "Lecture" makes 講, at least, easy to learn. As a primitive, it works well with a few others, too. I learned this one a day or two ago, so I'm hoping that it'll end up sticking in my head.
I do get a bit worried about using so many people/fictional characters for primitives (actually, all the ones I've mentioned thus far use humans.) Sometimes it has the potential to get confusing... For example, "[Person] does [action]" is the basis for a whole lot of stories. This could lead to one wondering "Wait a sec... I know somebody has to do [action], but who is it? Was it Spider-Man? Mr. T? Venom? The best thing to do is make sure that the story could ONLY be done by only one character. If the story involves wrapping up villains in Spidey-silk, then, well, you don't have to pause to remember that Spider-Man must be involved somehow. If the story features a fool that needs pitying, then it's unlikely that the pity-er will be Hannibal "Lecture," and you can rest assured knowing that Mr. T must be mixed up in the proceedings.
[Edit: Just touching up some punctuation]
Last edited by Murjab (2008 December 09, 9:13 am)