JFBP x Genki

Index » Learning resources

  • 1
 
Reply #1 - January 08, 9:16 pm
fabriciocarraro Member
From: São Paulo, Brazil Registered: 2013-12-30 Posts: 21

Hey my friends!

I've been taking the lessons with "Japanese for Busy People", which I like very much so far, but I'm thinking on changing to "Genki". I feel that I'm only learning the formal part with JFBP, while Genki seems to teach more about the informal speech. I don't know if that's just in the beginning though. What do you think about it?

Thanks in advance!

Reply #2 - January 08, 9:39 pm
Aikynaro Member
From: Tokyo Registered: 2012-07-26 Posts: 266

I don't know anything about either, but if you like what you're doing, keep doing it. Changing methods if you need to is great, but changing because you found a cool new idea is a great way to learn the same stuff again and again without actually progressing anywhere. If it's not broken, don't chuck it out, and all that.
And you're not going to learn real informal speech from a textbook anyway, so it doesn't matter. You can learn that later from native materials.

Reply #3 - January 08, 11:49 pm
mc962 Member
Registered: 2013-12-30 Posts: 108

I use Genki with my Japanese class and as far as textbooks go I like it. Havent had a chance with the other one yet. Out of curiosity how far did you look into the Genki books?

If JFBP goes like the average textbook I've seen/heard about (Genki does it too), then it starts out with focusing more on the grammar with "long" forms of words instead of stuff involving the "short"/dictionary forms. By this I mean it first teaches you about the -ます forms of the words and how that gets conjugated (-ます、-ません、-ませんでした、-ました, etc.) and then starts teaching you more about the "short" forms, and grammar involving them, which involve the form of the word you see in the dictionary (like "to eat" would be shown as たべる in the dictionary, this is it's short form). The short forms end up being more important for some later grammar, and also isnt necessarily as formal as the long forms.

It's not that Genki teaches more informal speech (although it does deal with informal speech and phrases somewhat), it just deals a lot with the short forms of words (mostly starting in the 2nd half of Genki 1 if I remember right) which is something that is helpful to know for structuring future grammar. Personally I wish the book did short forms before long forms, but I guess I can't complain since I learned it eventually

Like Aikynaro said, you probably won't learn the really good informal stuff from a textbook (aside from maybe one geared towards informal speech). But a lot of anime characters and tv show characters will likely use informal/short forms a fair bit (anime especially), and knowing them definitely helped me in understanding what they were talking about (it took me a while to realize I actually did know vocabulary in some of the shows I was watching, they were just using short forms of the words).

I'm obviously a bit biased towards Genki as I enjoy it as a textbook, but regardless, as long as JFBP is working for you then feel free to continue with it. You could always get both if you have the money and just get as much useful material as possible. Genki also has accompanying workbooks, I don't know if the other has that

Last edited by mc962 (January 08, 11:52 pm)

Advertising (register and sign in to hide this)
JapanesePod101 Sponsor
 
Reply #4 - January 09, 12:24 am
Taurus Member
From: Kofu, Yamanashi Registered: 2008-06-19 Posts: 100 Website

I found Japanese for Busy People proceeds way too slowly when I tried it several years ago. Then, on the recommendation of someone else I tried Minna no Nihongo and found that much better; and halfway through I discovered Anki and abandoned textbooks except insofar as I just stripped out sentences and stuck them in Anki with any relevant grammar/vocab explanations. I took a look at Genki but if I remember correctly I was put off by the fact that it uses romaji at first.

Regarding dictionary form vs. masu form, I found it pretty useful learning the masu form first because it is the basis of so many other forms; and because I'm a polite young (old) chap in English and like to be polite in Japanese too.

Reply #5 - January 09, 2:20 am
sholum Member
Registered: 2011-09-19 Posts: 265

Other than 'Japanese the Manga Way' and 'Japanese in Mangaland', I really didn't look very far into any textbooks. In fact, the main reason I looked into the two above was because they used 'real' examples. The latter also throws away romaji fairly early, which was also decent incentive to try it, though it's examples were reskinned to avoid copyright issues.
In the end, I didn't really find any of them particularly helpful and gave up trying to find a decent beginners textbook.

I found Tae Kim's guide to be much more accessible and comprehensible, though I didn't really start studying it until recently (almost two years after I started learning), so I already understood a decent amount of the grammar points in the first section.

I like the fact that it bases everything off of the dictionary form, which I find to be a much better way of learning conjugation. I did learn about the basic form of verbs pretty early on though, so I don't have much of any experience in trying to learn words in -ます form.
I guess, if you want to consider Tae Kim's grammar guide to be a textbook (it has been turned into a PDF and an actual book, so I guess it could be called that), then I'd recommend that.
Best of all, it's free, as long as you have a computer or smartphone.

Reply #6 - January 09, 12:24 pm
fabriciocarraro Member
From: São Paulo, Brazil Registered: 2013-12-30 Posts: 21

Thanks for your kind answers, guys!

I was just going through "Japanese for Busy People" to have a better notion about it, and I just found out that it's indeed reaaaaaaaaaaaally slow. They only start mentioning (not teaching) about the forms of verbs (which they introduce as "Regular I" and "Regular "II") on lesson 18, out of 25, and apparently they don't teach the -u and -ru forms at all in the 1st book. Also, they only teach simple things like "すきです" on the last lesson.
Therefore, I'm definitely changing to another book. Probably Genki then!

Thanks a lot people!

Reply #7 - January 09, 4:47 pm
ktcgx Member
From: japan Registered: 2012-07-18 Posts: 360

That sounds odd... Isn't it a book for people who want to pick up Japanese, but don't have a lot of time to devote to it? I would have thought they would move faster than that in that case...

Reply #8 - January 20, 6:49 am
fabriciocarraro Member
From: São Paulo, Brazil Registered: 2013-12-30 Posts: 21

Yeah, but apparently it moves at the pace of a snail. =P

Btw, how do you guys like "Tae Kim's Guide to Japanese"? Would you say it's better than a textbook?

Reply #9 - January 20, 7:46 am
rokudo Member
Registered: 2013-12-31 Posts: 26

fabriciocarraro wrote:

Yeah, but apparently it moves at the pace of a snail. =P

Btw, how do you guys like "Tae Kim's Guide to Japanese"? Would you say it's better than a textbook?

It's ok.. I found the explanations in the Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar are so much easier to understand.  I would definitely recommend the DoJG series.

[EDIT]: Japanese the Manga Way is also a great beginner resource for Japanese grammar.  It's easy to understand and interesting because it has examples taken directly from manga.

Last edited by rokudo (January 20, 7:52 am)

Reply #10 - January 20, 8:44 am
Ampharos64 Member
From: England Registered: 2008-12-09 Posts: 166

fabriciocarraro wrote:

Yeah, but apparently it moves at the pace of a snail. =P

Btw, how do you guys like "Tae Kim's Guide to Japanese"? Would you say it's better than a textbook?

I like it a lot better than Genki (only textbook I've studied in any depth) personally. It's to the point, and I find the way it phrases explanations makes them easier to understand, appreciate that it includes shorter and more casual forms, too.

But I'd say if you're gonna do Tae Kim's guides, might as well just go for the grammar guide, and then skim through the complete guide and read the dialogues.

Last edited by Ampharos64 (January 20, 8:46 am)

  • 1