RECENT TOPICS » View all
Hi, I was just wondering how fast you think both an average and a fast leaner could complete some textbooks in. (This is just me wondering, it has nothing to do with how I'm studying.)
You can talk about any textbook you've used.
I was wondering about Genki I and II, and Tobira specifically (since I'm buying Tobira now and waiting for it in the mail). I read one person say 1-3 days per chapter for Genki I, which has 12 chapters. But a "fast" Uni class finishes Genki I in three months, and a normal (American and assuming you're meeting twice a week) one finishes it in six months.
Anyway. What do you think? (Assuming we're using SRS and so on to help study)
Last edited by captainporridge (2013 December 29, 2:16 pm)
I did genki 1, one chapter a day putting all sentences into anki.
Genki 2, same thing, but slowed down at about half way because I wanted to cram a lot of vocab before I moved on.
Now on tobira but putting it on hold now, I'm doing a "cover to cover" of the dictionary of basic grammar. By that I mean jumping all around whichever seems interesting, but overall all will be done. I'm doing about 20-30 pages a day. Keep note this is during the break. I imagine it will go to 17-20 during school.
I did Minna no Nihongo for a while (only used it for sentence mining though), but got bored of it after chap 14 or something. I was doing about a chapter a day. I think 1 chapter a day is reasonable, even if you decide to actually read all the material in each chapter.
Last edited by sparky14 (2013 December 29, 7:14 pm)
sparky14 wrote:
I think 1 chapter a day is reasonable, even if you decide to actually read all the material in each chapter.
Wait, what do you mean? How can you "do a chapter" without actually reading it?
captainporridge wrote:
sparky14 wrote:
I think 1 chapter a day is reasonable, even if you decide to actually read all the material in each chapter.
Wait, what do you mean? How can you "do a chapter" without actually reading it?
He's talking about practice exercises in the textbook. *Hit me if I'm wrong
I wouldn't do them, their a waste of time in my opinion. Besides, you use a SRS program don't you?
Xanpakuto wrote:
I wouldn't do them, their a waste of time in my opinion. Besides, you use a SRS program don't you?
SRS is pretty limited though, I think, when it comes to basic grammar. You might think that you understand a concept, but then when you try to use the grammar yourself you make all kinds of mistakes. Going through the process of doing exercises, making mistakes, and figuring out mistakes can be a big help.
I'm a big believer in getting the basics down super well. I've lived in Japan a long time, and I find there's a big difference between people who studied Japanese in classes and went through the basics slowly and thoroughly and those who didn't. A lot of people who didn't have a good foundation make basic grammar mistakes much more often, even though at this point they know they're mistakes. It's hard to break bad habits.
For example, I have a friend who has lived in Japan for five years but he uses の all the time to modify nouns with verbs. So instead of よく行くお店 ("the store I often go to") he incorrectly says よく行くのお店. He KNOWS it's wrong to do that but he can't stop doing it in conversation all the time. Of course, we all have these kinds of mistakes, but my theory is that people who didn't get the basics down really well at the beginning make them much more often.
In that way, I'd say going through textbooks fairly quickly is good because it keeps you from losing steam(perhaps three to five days per chapter?), but I think one chapter a day is really too fast.
Last edited by Tzadeck (2013 December 29, 9:36 pm)
Tzadeck wrote:
In that way, I'd say going through textbooks fairly quickly is good because it keeps you from losing steam(perhaps three to five days per chapter?), but I think one chapter a day is really too fast.
If you ever did the Genki series, they usually introduce 3-5 new grammar points per chapter, less if it has a grammar point with more meat on it (intransitive vs transitive verbs). Depending on the person, it may take perhaps 1-4 hours to study all these grammar points and vocabulary to maybe 60% understanding. This includes putting everything into Anki if desired. The rest of the gap would be learned perhaps by reading a lot, watching stuff, tutor, etc.
As for production that's a whole different story. I'm not going to disagree that bad habits learned from the start are hard to break, but when learning something like a language, time spent is VERY important. If you study for years to only to get to a beginner level, I feel that time is wasted (not trying to offend anyone). That time spent could've been spent on something that would benefit you, programming perhaps. But hey, maybe someone really does like Japanese culture and want's to learn the language despite all the time it would take. If you get to such a low level in a long period of time, I would think that the method used is "not efficient." I haven't been studying Japanese for such a long time so I can't be talking like a hot shot, but for my real Japanese studying (~5 months active), I think I'm doing alright. I'm still refining my methods, trying to save as much time as possible. As you can see, my first few months of learning Japanese was actually making plans on how I should learn the language. This includes constant deck changes/deletes/layouts/pre-made decks/etc.
The faster one learns things may hurt or benefit someone. Like you said, your friend have sprinted through the basic grammar fast, creating bad habits. What if he did that in perhaps, 3 months. A different person, who speaks basic grammar perfectly, but spent 2 years? Ok back to the person who sprinted, the good thing is that your friend realizes his mistakes. Lets say he refines his methods more, and fixes his mistakes. At the 2 year mark, imagine what his level would be compared to the person who took it slow.
Everyone is different in their learning. If content is hard, it is ideal to slow down. 3-5 days is a reasonable pace, perhaps I'm learning wrong. I see some universities that offer Japanese that completes a Genki textbook over the course of a year. As for me, I would've burned out because it's too slow. You can call me impatient as it is true that learning Japanese isn't the 100 meter sprint, but actually a marathon. But in the marathon there's the racers. There's the slow runners and the fast runners. Both might the finish line, but, who gets there first. That all depends, who knows.
Maybe if our life span was quadrupled, than moving like a turtle is cool ;p
Oh the time spent writing this.
Well, I mean, Genki has a workbook. I would suggest doing that too. None of this is really set in stone, it's just what I would tell new learners.
In terms of time spent learning Japanese, I've said before that I think it takes most people about 7 years to pass N1. And faster people it maybe takes five years. Accomplishing it in much less than five years, such as two or three, is very rare (I've never actually met someone in person who did this). I really don't see a huge variation among people I've met in person--it usually took them between 6 and 8 years. The initial learning of basic grammar is not usually such a big chunk of the time it takes to reach a fairly high level.
Last edited by Tzadeck (2013 December 29, 11:42 pm)
As for textbooks, it's very important to try both old and new ones. Old ones teach in a different manner and order, sometimes entirely, and while the language may be outdated or obsolete, that "different teaching" can be very important and describe rules or origins that they don't teach in modern books. Below is an example from "An Introductory Course in Japanese" by Clay MacCauley, from 1906:
ある - simple, positive existence or possession, is indicated by this verb. Consequentially it has ordinarily the meanings “there is”, “i have”, etc. ある becomes polite when its Main Stem あり is used with ます, and becomes yet more polite when it takes on the form ござる in addition to that, as ござります or more commonly ございます. No real changes in meaning take place with these formal changes. They are merely compliances with the needs of social courtesy.
で ある - When the particle で is prefixed to ある or ござる and their various forms of inflection, the meaning of the combined result is that simply of “being.” The notion of possession disappears. で is another form for the gerundial particle にで, “being”. である, であろう etc. are usually abbreviated in speech into だ, だろう, and であった into だった etc. で あります becomes usually です, で ござりましょう becomes でしょう, で ございました becomes でした, etc. etc.
It's very interesting that people seem to take 6-8 years. I've met people who became fluent in Icelandic or Finnish after five years (coming from English). I met an Icelander who was fluent in Mandarin (and knew more characters than the normal Chinese person too) sometime before 8 years. If they're being serious, an English speaker can definitely become fluent in Swedish within 2 years, so that shows the difference between a language related to your own and not...
I wonder about other agglutinative-native language learners. For example, how much easier is it for a Finnish or Greenlandic speaker to learn Japanese.
Last edited by captainporridge (2013 December 30, 8:04 am)
What I mean is that I only use textbooks to put example sentences into my SRS.
I spent about a 1 week per chapter for Genki 1/2. Had the workbooks and the answer key.
I spent ~3 days doing the exercises in the textbook for a chapter, then ~3 days doing the exercises in the workbook for the chapter. Used answer key to check myself. I spent 1-2 hours of day studying, splitting this with SRS'ing the Genki vocab and keeping up with what was left of RTK reviews.
Looking back, I think SRSing the Core vocab would have been the better way to go, and instead made a deck of sentences from Genki. I've kinda made up for this by using sentences from Tae Kim instead.
I'll probably move on to Tobira next if I do another textbook. I don't think I could go through the Japan Times Intermediate book after Genki 1/2.
Last edited by muteki99 (2013 December 30, 2:15 pm)

