littlecrow
Member
Registered: 2013-12-12
Posts: 10
A simple website based on the data downloaded from this thread
http://forum.koohii.com/viewtopic.php?id=11273
As the website states, it is "Dictionary of Japanese Grammar Volumes: complete collection: key and example sentences"
Put it together because reading from Firefox using Rikaisama is just so enjoyable.
The website is very simple- sorry, learned enough HTML on the fly- but if you're like me who prefers to review things outside of Anki as well, figure this could be useful.
It has some ruby text on the Basic page, but not all of it. That was done mainly for testing purposes, since I don't know how to make it generate automatically (without it being machine inaccurate).
http://jiten.clanteam.com/
jmignot
Member
From: France
Registered: 2006-03-03
Posts: 205
I have got all three books, and obviously they contain much more than a mere list of example sentences. Still, it would be convenient to have those sentences readily available online for quick reference.
But like yudantaiteki, I doubt that this is acceptable practice with respect to copyright.
It is a pity, though…
vileru
Member
From: Cambridge, MA
Registered: 2009-07-08
Posts: 750
yudantaiteki wrote:
Are these dictionaries still in print? Reproducing basically the entire text online seems a bit shady.
Massive portions of the texts are missing, including all of the keys, indexes, appendixes, and other major parts. The website is just a stripped down version with only sentence-long explanations (the actual texts have detailed explanations with charts, sometimes spanning over a page) and example sentences. Of course, the legality of the site may be questionable (specifically, whether it falls under fair use or not), but it's definitely not an exact copy of the book.
It looks like a fair use argument can be made, but I'm not going to take up that mission. Here is the relevant fair use info (source):
Student Press Law Center wrote:
Courts look at four factors to determine if the use of a copyrighted work is a fair use:
1. The purpose and character of the use. Non-commercial uses for purposes like news reporting, teaching, criticism or commentary are more likely to be fair.
2. The nature of the copyrighted work. Uses of works containing mostly factual material like maps or biographies are more likely to be fair than uses of highly creative and original works like novels and cartoons.
3. How much of the original work is used. No more of the work than what is necessary may be used fairly. The test is both quantitative (how many words of a 200,000 word book are reproduced?) and qualitative (using the "core" or "heart" of a work -- no matter how small -- is less likely to be a fair use).
4. The effect of the use on the commercial value of the copyrighted work. This is the most important factor. If consumers are likely to buy the use as a substitute for the original, it probably will not qualify as a fair use.