RECENT TOPICS » View all
mr_hans_moleman wrote:
I wanted to be as accurate as possible. But as you can see for yourself, that is quite impossible.
Tzadeck wrote:
your original post is misleading. Obvious lie is still obvious.
In this thread, I've read a lot of things that seem quite impossible, but to say that you took between 2 years, 4 months and uh, 4 years, 4 months to pass the N1 . . . no, being accurate doesn't seem impossible.
You've also said that "passing N1 is not that hard" and that you slept during the test, and that you took the test in Japan. May I ask where and when? Sorry if I'm being overly "accurate."
I don't think 1-2 years to get a passing grade in n1 is that unbelievable if you really are consistent at it instead of just talking about studying. N1 is not that hard, it's just a matter of knowing enough of the content (especially vocabulary) and being able to read quickly. I failed by 2 points after 2 years of moderate studying and performing badly on the day. I would almost certainly pass now but I honestly don't see any value in the test any more now I'm beyond that level. N1 is no where near the end goal level. I'd say 2-3 years for n1 is a nice realistic goal to shoot for.
I think a lot of people here put a lot of effort into their japanese study, so there is an often missed truth floating behind these language forum stories by people who show up and say they did N1 in whatever months and became native-like at whatever years.
my question to these people that have sacrificed everything to speak japanese so quickly is...:
"do you have anything interesting to say?"
no matter how hard a language is, it is just a medium for communication. if you have given up a real skill / career / passion in order to learn Japanese... these are the things that make you unique as a person, and it seems bass-ackwards in my opinion.
this is the reason language majors in college always puzzled me. I just wonder if Mr. Moleman here can hold a conversation about something non-language related... when his last date was... how funny are his jokes?
These people are like empty shells of people...with good japanese.
Last edited by dtcamero (2013 October 14, 9:42 am)
I wouldn't confuse language majors with people who do nothing but study their language. Indeed, a lot don't seem to do much studying at all...
You definitely don't need to become an empty husk of a person to pass N1 after 2 years. A few hours a day of intelligent study/practice should suffice.
Last edited by dizmox (2013 October 14, 10:43 am)
dareka wrote:
I don't think 1-2 years to get a passing grade in n1 is that unbelievable if you really are consistent at it instead of just talking about studying. N1 is not that hard, it's just a matter of knowing enough of the content (especially vocabulary) and being able to read quickly. I failed by 2 points after 2 years of moderate studying and performing badly on the day. I would almost certainly pass now but I honestly don't see any value in the test any more now I'm beyond that level. N1 is no where near the end goal level. I'd say 2-3 years for n1 is a nice realistic goal to shoot for.
Pretty much the same. Passed level 2 (the old one) in a year and failed N1 by 7 points after 2 years of study. I had a terrible cold and had to go to the toilet (which wasn't officially allowed so they made me wait for about 10-15 mins... ah...) at the time so... maybe if I didn't have these problems I could have passed it. Or maybe not? Who knows... Anyway, N1 isn't really that hard in my opinion.
dizmox wrote:
I wouldn't confuse language majors with people who do nothing but study their language. Indeed, a lot don't seem to do much studying at all...
You definitely don't need to become an empty husk of a person to pass N1 after 2 years. A few hours a day of intelligent study/practice should suffice.
It's actually funny cause I find that most people around me can't really talk about anything else except the things they are interested in. I've never really met a true language geek though.
arupan wrote:
dizmox wrote:
I wouldn't confuse language majors with people who do nothing but study their language. Indeed, a lot don't seem to do much studying at all...
You definitely don't need to become an empty husk of a person to pass N1 after 2 years. A few hours a day of intelligent study/practice should suffice.It's actually funny cause I find that most people around me can't really talk about anything else except the things they are interested in. I've never really met a true language geek though.
My post is in response to the above, in respect to the below:
dtcamero wrote:
I think a lot of people here put a lot of effort into their japanese study, so there is an often missed truth floating behind these language forum stories by people who show up and say they did N1 in whatever months and became native-like at whatever years.
my question to these people that have sacrificed everything to speak japanese so quickly is...:
"do you have anything interesting to say?"
no matter how hard a language is, it is just a medium for communication. if you have given up a real skill / career / passion in order to learn Japanese... these are the things that make you unique as a person, and it seems bass-ackwards in my opinion.
this is the reason language majors in college always puzzled me. I just wonder if Mr. Moleman here can hold a conversation about something non-language related... when his last date was... how funny are his jokes?
These people are like empty shells of people...with good japanese.
Most of my intellectual interests rely heavily on nuances of language which a lot of people have called me a bit of a language obsessed freak for caring about the details so much. Used to do a lot of creative writing, so it sorts of ends up that way. Though I must say most people my age have little to not interest in word-play, and for the lack of a better phrasal: "poetic language".
Is there a distinction between a language geek who perhaps spends a little too little of their time doing "practical", non-contemplative related language things, reading, etc. and someone who spends a lot of their time maybe not so invested in language but learning multiple languages ala internet polyglot style?
On a side note, puns sure seem to rub some people the wrong way. Well, That more inevitable disgust from people once they've realised an entire conversation was based around the function of puns. The ability to propagate dialouge out of essentially nothing is kind of an interesting experiment and insight into how others pay attention to or do not pay attention to how they use and are used by language in forming ideas and trains of thought.
Often people more educated people have said that I am intelligent based on mere conversational input, but in reality all I'm doing is playing around with words, something like I've spent too much time doing, and using similar patterns to mimic and compliment their own communication style.
You can almost get away with a lot of not really being "an empty shell" by giving people what they really want: someone to listen to their opinions and have them confirmed as valid. Hell, I've had a (turned out to be bloody interesting) discussion with a stranger which ended up lasting for near an hour, on the topic of the differences between clutches used in cars today and cars used twenty years ago. Something I have absolutely no personally invested interest/knowledge/experience in.
Does enjoying this make me a bit of a language geek or more simply being aware enough to tell people what they want to hear?
pre-edit:
that came out all pretty strange and probably someone what manipulative. What I was trying to say is that even if you were an "empty shell" of a human being, there is a lot to experience and share with others simply by being willing to listen and take an interest in their worldview and the various fascinations involved. Many may not be willing to open up or share themselves, but even if you have a lived a normal existence (though keep in mind that there are millions of "normal" people who have pretty much nothing to comment on about life aside their jobs and mindless shit on TV) unless you are fascinated in others, being fascinating yourself is not enough to make bonds with people.
May as well have spent months in a shed studying in you aren't tuned-in enough to explore the worldview and ideals of others. Somewhat reminds me of two people I know who have spent some time traveling and living abroad, and yet still talk about the same things they did years prior, have the same mindset as before they left, and failed to really expand their worlds.
Something which, to put it in a way: there are many people who have become more worldly and interesting simply by being well-read. Something which can be undergone even for those empty shells of people who do nothing but study and fail to catch up on the latest office gossip or whether or not they really did release those baboons into the Big Brother house in season 46. Which is maybe what I'm trying to suggest is that this caricature of the hardcore studier who has completely shut him or herself off from the world is entirely vapid. That if anything, 'hardcore' expanding your knowledge of another language is not only expanding your world but giving you a more intimate access to the inner thoughts of millions of other people.
You might not have spend those months/years "living it up", but hey, you can spend the next five years doing a lot more of that than those who are still unable to experience such a literate experience within the language and with the native speakers than those who have done the 9-5, lead rich and fulfilling social lives, and have probably spent a tenth of the time studying the language.
As one can see: this caricature, this scarer of crows, can be stuffed both ways.
Last edited by uisukii (2013 October 14, 12:21 pm)
I took the test on July 4, 2010 at Saitama University.
Yes, I studied a lot. Like I said before, I did not have to study the previous JLPT tests. I tried doing one of the sample tests and found it quite easy, so I dropped my pencil halfway through it and decided that I was very much ready for the N1 test.
1 year and something months = 1 year and "16" months = 2 years and 4 months.
I passed the test after studying for 2 years and 4 months. It doesn't necessarily mean that I needed to study for 2 years and 4 months to pass the test. I could have taken the test at my 1 year and 6 month mark and still have passed it. But, who can really know those things?
"my question to these people that have sacrificed everything to speak japanese so quickly is...: do you have anything interesting to say?"
After you get to a certain level, you can learn things using Japanese as the medium. I learned how to play the piano by searching for tutorials in Japanese. I would look up recipes in Japanese.
I think we all have something interesting to say. We just have to talk about our life experiences, our happy moments and those moments that make us cringe. I'm not good at telling jokes but I can spin on my head ![]()
I have never taken a single class in Japanese. I learned it all by myself. I could have expedited the process if I had some guidance.Yes, I had to sacrifice a lot of time to learn Japanese but a whole new world opened up to me as result.
When was my last date?
That's all I did when I was in Japan. ![]()
If you are a single lady, pretty and looking, then let's have a SKYPE date. lol
Just don't tell my girlfriend.
Devoting yourself to your studies doesn't mean that you'll be a hermit. When I lived in Tokyo, I was talking to everybody(well, just the pretty girls).
If you want to talk more, let's talk in Japanese. I need the practice!
dtcamero wrote:
this is the reason language majors in college always puzzled me. I just wonder if Mr. Moleman here can hold a conversation about something non-language related... when his last date was... how funny are his jokes?
These people are like empty shells of people...with good japanese.
I am a musician, craft beer connoisseur, avid reader, movie freak, witty (in two languages!), traveler, gamer, swimmer, fisherman, gourmet, cook, cyclist, lover and linguist. Pick your poison. ;] (And those are just the things I do regularly).
Just because someone works hard on one thing doesn't mean they have to neglect everything else.
I realize that this post was mainly just an add-on attack on moleman, which is .. ok .. whatever, but I fall into the "worked his ass off on the language" category as well. :]
Now, admittedly, there are sometimes people like Benny who are absolutely devoted to Language but.. is that such a bad thing? If his passion is language- good for him. We also happen to all be talking on a forum dedicated to language learning- the topic of language is sure to be the main point of conversation. ;P Language learning is hard- and learners often want some sort of confirmation that their hard work will pay off. That's where the story-telling of the experienced (or the hype of a full-time language learner) comes in. Moleman may have exaggerated a bit more than would be advisable but the ~2.5 he's sticking to now is totally plausible.. I made an "A" on that sucker in the same!
What's your passion..?
Mine's music, by the way. Language is just a side project. 8)
dtcamero wrote:
I think a lot of people here put a lot of effort into their japanese study, so there is an often missed truth floating behind these language forum stories by people who show up and say they did N1 in whatever months and became native-like at whatever years.
my question to these people that have sacrificed everything to speak japanese so quickly is...:
"do you have anything interesting to say?"
no matter how hard a language is, it is just a medium for communication. if you have given up a real skill / career / passion in order to learn Japanese... these are the things that make you unique as a person, and it seems bass-ackwards in my opinion.
this is the reason language majors in college always puzzled me. I just wonder if Mr. Moleman here can hold a conversation about something non-language related... when his last date was... how funny are his jokes?
These people are like empty shells of people...with good japanese.
Most literature is translated (since unless you're a total bore you're unlikely to stick to literature from your own country), and people who dedicate themselves to language study are the ones who make that possible. Not to mention all the other forms of media. What would the news be if we wouldn't have people from around the world translating it from one place to the other? And no, an average speaker can't properly do translation, no matter how much he fools himself.
Interpreting has always been vital for international diplomacy, and is a job that's been around for millenia.
Not to mention that the act of learning itself is a fascinating topic, and people discuss it endlessly. All you need is the right audience.
Oh, and the language trivia and jokes? Seriously? Do you have any idea how much people laugh when I tell them words like ふとい。すごい。くる。かかる。ふうとう etc? (hint: they sound damned dirty in Romanian). My former roommate still knows how to say その口じゃない、テンタックルさん。My random phrases in various languages are a hit
.
Not to mention the access you get to its culture. Sure, you can learn a lot about a culture without knowing the terms, but good luck memorizing names and items without knowing it. Most people I know who read about Japanese culture can't remember names for the life of them.
And that's setting aside the fact that language majors usually also study linguistics, literature, philology, etc. It does depend on the program, though.
Also, most people don't have anything interesting to say; most conversations are small talk and are ultimately meaningless, if not boring. more often than not you're likely to talk to someone infuriating than fascinating. There's a reason why the word "average" exists.
My thing is doing t-rex impressions.
(where all my canadian 90s kids at?)
dtcamero wrote:
These people are like empty shells of people...with good japanese.
Assuming is bad, mmmmkay.
Can we just stop with this line of thinking... in general? Like zgarbas said, most conversations are trivial stuff. Most people don't bare their soul to everyone they meet on a daily basis. That doesn't mean that people don't have ambitions and interests of their own...
It seems like lots of people carry around a 'guilty until proven innocent' attitude about that sort of thing. Its something I really dislike hearing about, but seems more and more likely to be true. I mean, how enjoyable is conversation going to be if you think everyone around you just assumes you're a drab, dull, and boring person, by default.
Last edited by Haych (2013 October 14, 5:01 pm)
dtcamero wrote:
I think a lot of people here put a lot of effort into their japanese study, so there is an often missed truth floating behind these language forum stories by people who show up and say they did N1 in whatever months and became native-like at whatever years.
my question to these people that have sacrificed everything to speak japanese so quickly is...:
"do you have anything interesting to say?"
no matter how hard a language is, it is just a medium for communication. if you have given up a real skill / career / passion in order to learn Japanese... these are the things that make you unique as a person, and it seems bass-ackwards in my opinion.
this is the reason language majors in college always puzzled me. I just wonder if Mr. Moleman here can hold a conversation about something non-language related... when his last date was... how funny are his jokes?
These people are like empty shells of people...with good japanese.
I disagree you need to give up your life to learn Japanese fast.
I've done Japanese every day for about 19 months (first 3 months it wasn't every day, last 440 days or so has been), while simultaneously doing a medicine degree, a part time job and still able to socialise with friends on weekends and such. My Japanese is a little below N1 level marginally, in more concrete terms I'm level 44 on the JALUP level test (the owner predicts level 50 is N1 roughly). I should be N1 ability by mid-late December, but it's not my final goal (I don't bother with JLPT).
Sure 19 months isn't the fastest ever, but I think it's a pretty solid pace given the other things I have on.
You don't need to give up everything just to learn a language fast. You just need to be good with time management, very motivated, be honest with yourself about what you can and can't do, and be able to recognise the deficits in your ability and work on them.
Last edited by AKITOD (2013 October 15, 1:54 am)
AKITOD wrote:
Sure 19 months isn't the fastest ever, but I think it's a pretty solid pace given the other things I have on.
wow this forum is full of khatzumotos who self-studied to N1 in a year and change... amazing!
zgarbas wrote:
Also, most people don't have anything interesting to say; most conversations are small talk and are ultimately meaningless, if not boring. more often than not you're likely to talk to someone infuriating than fascinating. There's a reason why the word "average" exists.
I like this answer... that these people would probably have been boring anyway, even without ignoring everything to study.
dtcamero wrote:
AKITOD wrote:
Sure 19 months isn't the fastest ever, but I think it's a pretty solid pace given the other things I have on.
wow this forum is full of khatzumotos who self-studied to N1 in a year and change... amazing!
Yeah- maybe we should do what those guys are doing. They seem to be succeeding.
Or ridicule them. Y'know, whatever seems the most reasonable.
dtcamero wrote:
zgarbas wrote:
Also, most people don't have anything interesting to say; most conversations are small talk and are ultimately meaningless, if not boring. more often than not you're likely to talk to someone infuriating than fascinating. There's a reason why the word "average" exists.
I like this answer... that these people would probably have been boring anyway, even without ignoring everything to study.
I'm going to pretend that you didn't just think of this after reading Zgarbas' post. But hey- at least the people who have made language learning their passion have SOMETHING to talk about. Their passion just happens to be language learning. It's like people who major in Philosophy so they can go.. teach Philosophy. At least they've got something!
AKITOD wrote:
Sure 19 months isn't the fastest ever, but I think it's a pretty solid pace given the other things I have on.
I've never met any native English speaker in real life who passed N1 in less than two years. Or even close. So, 19 months is incredibly fast to be at that level. Then again, you say you're not bothering with the test, so who knows if you would pass it in December.
I do know plenty of Chinese or Taiwanese people who passed it around that time frame.
Last edited by Tzadeck (2013 October 15, 2:41 am)
drdunlap wrote:
dtcamero wrote:
AKITOD wrote:
Sure 19 months isn't the fastest ever, but I think it's a pretty solid pace given the other things I have on.
wow this forum is full of khatzumotos who self-studied to N1 in a year and change... amazing!
Yeah- maybe we should do what those guys are doing. They seem to be succeeding.
Or ridicule them. Y'know, whatever seems the most reasonable.
Definitely the ridiculing... ![]()
Some people just have a knack for languages, others don't. Whatevs ^_^
Tzadeck wrote:
AKITOD wrote:
Sure 19 months isn't the fastest ever, but I think it's a pretty solid pace given the other things I have on.
I've never met any native English speaker in real life who passed N1 in less than two years. Or even close. So, 19 months is incredibly fast to be at that level. Then again, you say you're not bothering with the test, so who knows if you would pass it in December.
I do know plenty of Chinese or Taiwanese people who passed it around that time frame.
2 - 3 year time frame for Englishy peoples? 8)
I am a little curious as to what the absolute minimum skill required to pass equates to. What was it, 101/180? So less vocab, less listening skill.. maybe a little less of a good grasp on syntax and etc.? I feel like ~2 year mark me would have been ok for sliding by but I'll never know. I think my listening still sucked at that time, though. (Although I remember listening being the easiest section for me because it was Testanese. Which sounds slightly dirty. Maybe. But let's ignore that.) I was always aiming for a "good grade" on the test because I didn't realize what the pass mark was. (*ノω・*)テヘ
As for the original point of this thread (bananas? aliens?), I'm ok with Benny's slightly skewed definition of "fluent" and slightly questionable methods. The fact is that he's going to have a better grasp on the language in a short time than many people ever will. Is it the most efficient way? Maybe not. But the lesson learned may be "If you do something- and keep on doing it- you will see results." In the same way I'm ok with believing people who say they did something in a seemingly too-short period of time- even if it's just to steal the idea for my own motivation and not necessarily copy said person. That's what I did with AJATT, anyway.
drdunlap wrote:
2 - 3 year time frame for Englishy peoples? 8)
It's reasonably possible. I think the average is more like 6 or 7, but 2-3 is probably possible for people with good study skills.
I can still think of a million reasons why I'm initially skeptical of any claim for under two years though. One example that pops up to me is a friend of mine I worked with for a year at a not-so-busy school in the inaka. He was a smart guy, and was much more persistent at studying than I am. He was engaged at the time, and was really into business, so he wanted to get a business-y job in Japan to start a family here, so he figured he needed to study Japanese hard. He studied his ass off, and I saw him do it for hours and hours at work every day, but he ended up failing JLPT 2 pretty miserably at the end of 2 years. He's taking it again this winter, at the two and a half year mark.
Or, even to take my own example, it took me two years to go from N2 to N1. I'm not the best studier for that kind of thing--my specialty in learning is definitely not memorizing and that kind of stuff. I'm more of a concept guy. And I wasn't really good at doing anki to the extent that I did it. But I really studied regularly for those two years, and pretty seriously and intensely for certain stretches, and it still took two years.
There's really no end to the examples since I've seen so many learners in so many different situations (simply because I've lived in Japan for so long). And though I've known dozens or perhaps hundreds of learners, I really can't think of any native English speakers who did N1 in even three years.
Last edited by Tzadeck (2013 October 15, 6:39 am)
Tzadeck wrote:
I think the average is more like 6 or 7, but 2-3 is probably possible for people with good study skills.
Heh, it took me 6.5 years, right in the middle of your "average". I don't have any doubt that it could be done faster, though, although the question is "how much faster?" I mean, when I started I basically just had a textbook and a workbook, and a little after that I bought a romaji paper dictionary...so, yeah, I didn't have the best set-up from the beginning. But I did study pretty hard. I remember spending lots of time in the library copying vocabulary by hand over and over and reading ahead in the textbooks in my free time...but I certainly wish I had had Anki, good dictionaries, and a systematic approach to the kanji earlier on.
Tzadeck wrote:
I can still think of a million reasons why I'm initially skeptical of any claim for under two years though. One example that pops up to me is a friend of mine I worked with for a year at a not-so-busy school in the inaka. He was a smart guy, and was much more persistent at studying than I am. He was engaged at the time, and was really into business, so he wanted to get a business-y job in Japan to start a family here, so he figured he needed to study Japanese hard. He studied his ass off, and I saw him do it for hours and hours at work every day, but he ended up failing JLPT 2 pretty miserably at the end of 2 years. He's taking it again this winter, at the two and a half year mark.
There is a difference between studying hard, and studying smart though...
I got 169 out of 180 points on the N1 in under three years. The first year was college classes only and the summer after that first year is when I did RTK1. I'm not a genius- I failed miserably at French despite it being theoretically much easier for English natives to learn than Japanese. But after that first year I gave up on textbooks and decided that native material was the way to go. I didn't ask questions- I just went with it. I read novels. So many novels. And newspapers. So many newspapers. I watched dramas. So many dramas. And anime... ok not that much anime. Also some gaming. I just did what I loved anyway in Japanese. (Sound familiar? #ajatt)
I picked up a grammar study guide and one practice test 1 month before the test.
I don't think it's so much whether or not one studies for the test. In fact, I would highly suggest one NOT study for the test and instead focus on getting in touch with the language. Certainly, being bad at test-taking will hurt you on the JLPT but, in a way, it's an easy test if you're ready for it.
Basically, I did what Khatz advocates and just ignored the parts (turn off English, ignore your friends, sell your life to Japanese) that I didn't like. The guy's got a point- forget your native language and go for it. Your native language has nothing to do with your second language (even if it seemingly does, like French and English, for example). If you think in one language and attempt to speak (or take a test) in another, you will likely fail.
However, motivation and method are unreasonably large factors. I mean, ok, they're reasonable, but it's terrifying how much of a difference they make. I will never stop advocating the "go with the flow and stop asking questions" approach.
Tzadeck wrote:
drdunlap wrote:
2 - 3 year time frame for Englishy peoples? 8)
It's reasonably possible. I think the average is more like 6 or 7, but 2-3 is probably possible for people with good study skills.
I can still think of a million reasons why I'm initially skeptical of any claim for under two years though. One example that pops up to me is a friend of mine I worked with for a year at a not-so-busy school in the inaka. He was a smart guy, and was much more persistent at studying than I am. He was engaged at the time, and was really into business, so he wanted to get a business-y job in Japan to start a family here, so he figured he needed to study Japanese hard. He studied his ass off, and I saw him do it for hours and hours at work every day, but he ended up failing JLPT 2 pretty miserably at the end of 2 years. He's taking it again this winter, at the two and a half year mark.
Or, even to take my own example, it took me two years to go from N2 to N1. I'm not the best studier for that kind of thing--my specialty in learning is definitely not memorizing and that kind of stuff. I'm more of a concept guy. And I wasn't really good at doing anki to the extent that I did it. But I really studied regularly for those two years, and pretty seriously and intensely for certain stretches, and it still took two years.
There's really no end to the examples since I've seen so many learners in so many different situations (simply because I've lived in Japan for so long). And though I've known dozens or perhaps hundreds of learners, I really can't think of any native English speakers who did N1 in even three years.
That is anecdote and incredulity, though. I can come up with a million reasons as to be skeptical not to belief the claim that person X achieved Y in time-frame Z, but without anything objective, it still boils down to failing to accept that the situation can occur.
There is nothing inherently irrational with that, though it does steep into pointless emotionalism if I were to step beyond the demand for evidence for making positive claims such as calling someone an obvious liar, when all I have to base my opinion on is "well I've never really seen it happen and cannot accept it so you are obviously making stuff up or being dishonest."
As soon as you start making and confusing your own personal experience as being objective data, and using that to make positive assertions, the burden or proof begins to shift.
There is large logical distinction between stating "I do not have the reason to justify acceptance/belief in X as a true/accurate claim" and actively stating "X is false".
Edit: sorry, forgot to use quotations.
Last edited by uisukii (2013 October 15, 7:01 am)
uisukii, I still don't care about this argument.
Last edited by Tzadeck (2013 October 15, 7:05 am)
drdunlap wrote:
I got 169 out of 180 points on the N1 in under three years.
I believe you, and good job. I'm just skeptical of claims of doing it very quickly, it's not that I never believe them. You come off as reasonable and honest, Moleman does not.
ktcgx wrote:
There is a difference between studying hard, and studying smart though...
Well, he had most of the tools that people here talk about a lot, and he's also good at forcing himself to use Japanese both for consuming media and when socializing.
(Sorry, meant to combine this with the last post but I made a mistake and you can't delete anymore. Three posts in a row!)
Last edited by Tzadeck (2013 October 15, 7:19 am)
Tzadeck wrote:
uisukii, I still don't care about this argument.
I don't care if you don't care. It is a valid argument which highlights that you seem to be reacting in an emotional manner, arrogantly ignoring any reasons which do not fit your desired way of thought.
As long as you remain content in disregarding others and reacting personally to achievements of others, it will remain relevant. You aren't an expert on other people's learning experience. Something a lot of people on online forums seem to forget. Whether or not you think that drdunlap comes off as more reasonable as mr_hans_moleman is entirely irrelevant. The point is that they both put in the hard work and achieved something which many take years longer to do.
Avoiding something doesn't invalidate it.
Edit: Webgator Hosting ate the post.
Last edited by uisukii (2013 October 15, 7:23 am)

