How much different is it? Totally or just a dot or a distorted shape? In the latter case, it's just something that happens with some fonts, like ファブリス says.

nac_est wrote:

How much different is it? Totally or just a dot or a distorted shape? In the latter case, it's just something that happens with some fonts, like ファブリス says.

Hmm.  How can I  describe Kanji without writing it?  I'll try.
The left and right elements of both "rue" 's are no different.
The middle element differs from "silver" as follows:
The top portion of the  element is the same except there is an additional sort of apostrophe as in "good".
The bottom two aligned (non-vertical, non-horizontal lines) of "silver" are not there.
Instead there are two horizontal lines as in the keyword "staples".
I'm using Vista.  I'll have  to try  it using XP when I have the opportunity.
But I don't know how to examine a particular Kanji as a review Kanji although I am able to examine it as a study Kanji.
Now I've  found another Kanji with different stroking.  The key word "domesticate" is also similarily different.
Rather than pointing out these  differences as time passes, would you agree that the Kanji stroking in Heisig RTK  I should take precedence?

Well, upon further research, I finally understand the problem and have a solution.
I have been copying Kanji from the Kanji study section to a table I made using Microsoft Works.  Then I was able to study this Kanji in my morning walk.  I see now that when I make the copy, Works changes the Kanji strokes.  Today I remade a table using Open Office and the copies to this  table did not modify the kanji strokes.  Apparently the Open  office fonts and Works fonts have differences so I'll stick to Open Office from hereon.  Thanks for  the help guys.