Why is Japanese pitch accent almost never taught?

Index » General discussion

 
AlexandreC Member
From: Canada Registered: 2008-09-26 Posts: 309

Every teacher I ever asked told to listen and copy. I always understood that as and admission of ignorance.

undead_saif Member
From: Mother Earth Registered: 2009-01-28 Posts: 635

AlexandreC wrote:

Every teacher I ever asked told to listen and copy. I always understood that as and admission of ignorance.

Hmm, if you asked different teachers then it might be as you say LOL

JimmySeal Member
From: Kyoto Registered: 2006-03-28 Posts: 2279

undead_saif wrote:

AlexandreC wrote:

Every teacher I ever asked told to listen and copy. I always understood that as and admission of ignorance.

Hmm, if you asked different teachers then it might be as you say LOL

Wait, that doesn't make sense.  Many teachers gave the same advice so the conclusion is that they all don't know what they're talking about?

Advertising (register and sign in to hide this)
JapanesePod101 Sponsor
 
AlexandreC Member
From: Canada Registered: 2008-09-26 Posts: 309

JimmySeal wrote:

undead_saif wrote:

AlexandreC wrote:

Every teacher I ever asked told to listen and copy. I always understood that as and admission of ignorance.

Hmm, if you asked different teachers then it might be as you say LOL

Wait, that doesn't make sense.  Many teachers gave the same advice so the conclusion is that they all don't know what they're talking about?

When it comes to pitch accent, most teachers know nothing. So, yes, they all defaulted to the same answer because they had nothing better to say.

undead_saif Member
From: Mother Earth Registered: 2009-01-28 Posts: 635

JimmySeal wrote:

undead_saif wrote:

AlexandreC wrote:

Every teacher I ever asked told to listen and copy. I always understood that as and admission of ignorance.

Hmm, if you asked different teachers then it might be as you say LOL

Wait, that doesn't make sense.  Many teachers gave the same advice so the conclusion is that they all don't know what they're talking about?

It makes sense because I found the answer to be nontraditional, you rarely meet a teacher that uses unconventional methods like learning from Anime, drama and music ( though it's the standard here!). So I personally think that if different teachers gave the same 'weird' answer then it's as Alex said!

Edit: Come to think of it, maybe because it's the ONLY way to learn intonation.
Also, my teacher named Anime. drama and music and didn't just say "listen to Japanese" so she maybe she really knew what she's talking about. And her experience in learning other languages might've added to her advice...

Last edited by undead_saif (2012 September 22, 12:40 pm)

Seren Member
Registered: 2012-02-27 Posts: 26

Incidentally, in my second or third class of Japanese 1 the teacher spent about 10 minutes explaining what it was (high and low), and then pointed in the textbook to the lines above words indicating the pitch. She then promptly realized the textbook had incorrectly given the pitch for akai. (The textbook had indicated "2" using lines above the word). However I don't think she is planning on ever mentioning it again. So at least it was introduced in my class.

JimmySeal Member
From: Kyoto Registered: 2006-03-28 Posts: 2279

@undead - I think you're buying into the caricature of teachers that people like to paint here.  There are loads of decent teachers who recommend using TV shows and music as learning aides.

nadiatims Member
Registered: 2008-01-10 Posts: 1676

AlexandreC,

Despite all your wonderful observations about pitch, I can't help but wonder whether you really learned pitch by reading about these rules, or if the reverse is true. ie. you're able to make these observations because you're able to recognize pitch for whatever reason (talent, listening practice).  I also wonder how well you're able to apply pitch consciously while speaking fluently. And how would you even know that your resulting pronunciation is good except by relying on your ears? As an experiment, try speaking english at a normal speed while deliberately misplacing the stress. It's not exactly easy, despite the fact that altering the stress placement on individual words is (I assume) something that any native speaker can do very easily.

There is a book called "drawing on the right side of the brain" which mentions something interesting. In it there is an exercise in which one is instructed to duplicate a picture which is observed upside down. By placing the picture upside down the brain becomes less aware of what the image is actually representing and is therefore better able to focus purely on replicating the pure visual data. Basically you 'see' reality more objectively and can therefore replicate it more accurately because you don't concern yourself with categorizing what you are seeing as predefined objects which have a predefined appearance and/or way of being drawn.

This is why I think pure listening practice is extremely powerful even if you don't understand a lot. Just listen to audio, and don't concern yourself with how it ought to be transcribed.

undead_saif Member
From: Mother Earth Registered: 2009-01-28 Posts: 635

JimmySeal wrote:

@undead - I think you're buying into the caricature of teachers that people like to paint here.  There are loads of decent teachers who recommend using TV shows and music as learning aides.

Nope, the image is from teachers who taught me in school and university. I've never met a language teacher who recommended anything other than textbooks, and met a single prof. in uni who who was a great teacher and opened for us new paths to learning. I hope I've seen the worst tongue

I've always thought my ideas about language learning was revolutionary (lol), until I've found this site, provided that I've never read about language learning before I arrived here, and the only way school and uni teachers offered for learning languages is textbooks (and some selected literature).

(Now that I think of it, language learning in our education system was one hellish backward ride...)