Nukemarine
Member
From: 神奈川
Registered: 2007-07-15
Posts: 2347
Yes, we don't want a large number of Columns, but is it possible to consider:
Stack Number: Displays which memory stack the card currently is in. I think this is the most obvious missed section. The reason should be obvious since you only know the stack if you never missed any on that card.
Stroke Count: Not a major column. In fact, probably useless. However, it is a stat offered on the card.
Kun: Well, if you have On, I guess Kun would naturally follow.
Star count: Ego thing perhaps, but seeing as I do not visit a card I do not miss (no need to study it), I may miss out that there's a story that others tend to like.
Warning count: Again, ego thing. Or maybe I posted something wrong, or shared a private story I should not have.
ファブリス
Administrator
From: Belgium
Registered: 2006-06-14
Posts: 4021
Website
I've just added the leitner box column.
Stroke count is for curiosity, people always wonder how "difficult" the characters are, what are the most intricate kanji.. it confirms also that the Pass/Fail ratio with RtK is barely related to the character's visual complexity.
Kun : both On and Kun need to be handled specifically, which will come with the next big site update, in the meantime I thought the On reading could help those who want to experiment with kanji chains and such. For this purpose I selected one "principal" reading, this might not work so easily with Japanese readings. Displaying multiple readings would be outside of the context of this page.
Star count: I guess you mean the star count for your own story, if you shared one, for that particular kanji? I think this would be better handled specifically on the profile pages, or as an addition to the study "landing" page. Same for warning count, this will go with finishing the reporting options for the votes. It'll just have to wait because I'm far more motivated right now with the next big update vocab review, etc.
