Hi, I've got up to lesson 5 so far, and it seems to be going great but I just have a few clarifications..
So we make up stories for each kanji to help us remember, and that's all we'll have to reference later when it comes back in a review. But if everytime it comes back we need the story to reference, does it really start going in your long term memory? Some experience here would be helpful. If we review it a couple times using the story, since you've been doing it so long, do you just start knowing them without reference? I'm just wondering since for some I REALLY need the story, which is pretty helpful, to remember what primitive elements were in it, so I can get the image of it back in my head.
For ex. for #Specialty#
If you can accurately MEASURE out the yield of TEN FIELDS OF RICE, then you indeed have a specialty in growing rice.
Obviously comprising of measure, ten, and rice field.
Is this fine? Will this get the job done like it's supposed to?
So we make up stories for each kanji to help us remember, and that's all we'll have to reference later when it comes back in a review. But if everytime it comes back we need the story to reference, does it really start going in your long term memory? Some experience here would be helpful. If we review it a couple times using the story, since you've been doing it so long, do you just start knowing them without reference? I'm just wondering since for some I REALLY need the story, which is pretty helpful, to remember what primitive elements were in it, so I can get the image of it back in my head.
For ex. for #Specialty#
If you can accurately MEASURE out the yield of TEN FIELDS OF RICE, then you indeed have a specialty in growing rice.
Obviously comprising of measure, ten, and rice field.
Is this fine? Will this get the job done like it's supposed to?


![[Image: Classical%20Conditioning.gif]](http://blog.lib.umn.edu/huber195/psy1001spring12/Classical%20Conditioning.gif)
Good advice for sure.