Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 762
Thanks:
3
You didn't say "fiction" - you said "writing style" and this includes both long fiction and short essays.
But word play aside, I just think that framing Murakami as a completely westernised author is wrong. (So is any attempt in depicting him as an author who is deeply rooted in the Japanese culture.)
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 302
Thanks:
0
There's plenty of awesome Japanese literature. You can go on Aozora, but there's also a lot of great stuff beyond that. Though, if you're just trying to learn the language than maybe something more accessible like Harry Potter is a better choice.
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,494
Thanks:
51
Ah, semantics <3. I admit to expressing it wrongly then.
I don't know, I've read quite a few of his novels (stereotypically, he was my first Japanese author) and imho he has way more in common with Sabato or other South-American writers than with any other Japanese author I've read. Sean Connery fetishists, retellings of Oedipus, Beatles intertextuality, an entire book basically dedicated to his listing jazz songs, etc., they're pretty Westernized ideas.
Of course, he does feature the general themes of isolation which is important to Japanese literature, but imho he does it in a way which is more Kazuo Ishiguro (whose books are considered British) than anything.
Either way, what I was trying to say is that if you're going for something that's all about Japanese culture because Western fiction is boring, going for the most Westernized Japanese author there is might not be the best idea. If you're going for something that's totes Japanese, there's always Kawabata, Mishima&Co.