Joined: May 2007
Posts: 328
Thanks:
0
Well.. i think it is more about analyzing the language before you decide if you are going to want to learn it. He does suggest, one should pick a language that's close some language you already know, in order to pick it up fast. He must be talking about spoken language.
They are good ideas, but as you said; common sense (with a provocative title).
I know a guy who claims, he's able to speak about 23 languages, but when you check, which languages, it turns out that most of them are very closely related to each other but no really "hard" languages.
That approach works if you want to be able to impress ignorant people with the amount of different languages you can ask directions in. (which can be fun btw! ;p)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 367
Thanks:
0
Thanks ファブリス for linking to that article, I thought it was only me who thought Japanese was like a programming language, I think of particles like delimiters and various other parts of Japanese seem to fit in my mind being a CompSci. guy.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,022
Thanks:
1
Sounds more like: How to determine in an hour how hard a language is to learn, as opposed to actually learning it.
Edited: 2007-11-08, 6:26 pm
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,219
Thanks:
0
"How to find out what a good Wikipedia article on any language would say...even if there isn't one!"