Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 29
Thanks:
0
So, I'm at #652, and on my third attempt of RTK. I'm at a steady pace of about 35-40 new Kanji/day.
My process, when I'm reviewing new cards for the first time, is to 1) read the keyword, then 2) recall the story from memory(only if I need to), and 3) recall kanji from memory. If I'm able to do this in about 30 seconds, I pass it. If it takes longer, I fail it and take extra time to revert the stories to memory. However, I'm reading of most other people giving MUCH more time (up to 3-4 minutes) to recall a Kanji, and even getting to peek at the story written down to help recall the Kanji. Is this a more efficient way to learn new cards? Am I making it too hard on myself. If I am, I feel I'm capable of going at a faster pace. My worry is if I decide to go faster WITH the aid of the story written down at the beginning, it won't help me in the long run.
I understand this topic probably has been discussed before, but I've been unable to find it in the forums...
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 90
Thanks:
0
I only give myself 10 seconds. I don't write the kanji, only recall the shape (primitives, location and peculiarities). At 50 new per day, I had ca. 250 reviews per day.
You're fast enough. At 40 a day, you'll be done in a month. Sure, you can do 100 a day and be done twice as fast, but you'll overwhelm yourself with reviews and you'll end up reviewing the "learned" kanji for a month after having "completed" RTK1. Not that that's bad, as it'll let you get on with core6k and in general finish faster, but it's time-consuming and not as efficient. Plus, since you seem to have given up a few times already, you'd want to stay consistent and just keep doing it, going 150% and then burning out won't help you.
Edited: 2012-04-12, 11:45 pm
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 29
Thanks:
0
As for Anki vs. RevTK, I just recently downloaded Anki a few days ago and am really digging the layout. Plus the fact I can review whenever I need to on my phone, I'm thinking of switching over to that. But that's a hell of a lot of stories to transfer over for me... -.-
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 90
Thanks:
0
Just don't mark a card as correctly answered if you needed the story to answer it. The goal is, after all, to connect the keywords to the characters, not the stories to them.
About the only hint I'd add and not use as grounds for marking the card as "failed" is one to help distinguish between characters with similar keywords.
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 90
Thanks:
0
Sorry, I meant if you need to look at the story. Recalling the story from the keyword is fine, it's how they're meant to be used. Guess I should've been clearer with my wording.
Personally, I never paid attention to writing and used RTK for the meanings only. I don't think the three months the process took me were misspent - knowing the meanings in advance helps me a lot, and not least, I don't need to have spent hours with every kanji in context to make it more than just "another weird symbol" in my mind, they're all differentiated and systematized.
Edited: 2012-04-13, 5:14 am
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 12
Thanks:
0
I'm surprised to see you guys say that if you read the story it's a fail. I have my Anki set up so that it hides the story in a hint. If I can remember the kanji with just the keyword then it's easy. If I have think of the story then it's good and if I can't remember the kanji even after looking at the story then it's the fail. It seems like there are people here who don't have the book trying to make things harder. The story is important also because it should include the primitives that make up the kanji.
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 256
Thanks:
1
As another person on the forum said, the story is effectively the direct formula for the kanji, so reading that is just as bad as looking at the kanji and copying it. Of course, if you remember it without aid, that's fine, that's the aim of the method. It's not making it harder, it's just making sure you're learning the right things.