Thora Wrote:(Pls don't let this trigger another debate.)
That's a good one.
Thora Wrote:I didn't get the impression that (...)
Oh you didn't? Intead you got another impression? Well I just stated mine.
Thora Wrote:(...) you were not being entirely balanced in your assessment of their value here.
I don't really assess the "value" of someone's contributions, when solving flame threads and otherwise divisive posts/topics. I'm not even sure what you're trying to say. Either way nestOr's account was not deleted. He left.
Thora Wrote:The source of their indignation was stated to be your apparent bias in singling them out for blame and an involuntary "time out" even though others were engaging in similar behaviour.
Yes and I just (again) commented on that.
Thora Wrote:You've remarked in the past that it annoys you that certain people act like they own this place.
I may have said something like that but it's not so much about owning the place. I was just annoyed by their numerous posts which were more often than not a way of establishing their identity and self-worth. That's
my intepretation, or opinion.
I'm not perfect. It's called ego. In any case, I never banned them did I ? They left.
Thora Wrote:You've also commented that this forum is largely self-regulating. I suppose some active members play a role in keeping the quality of discussion from deteriorating into the nonsense and offensiveness that can be found elsewhere on the net. And when active members go too far, people let them know. We may not always like everyone's style of communication, but we can at least try to balance that against their generous contributions. Self-regulation involves some trade-offs.
Sorry, you lost me. I get dumber and dumber lately. Plain english please.
Thora Wrote:My comments, in particular, were snidely and grossly misrepresented. But maybe you were attempting to bookend the thread...?)
Ah ha. So this is what this reply is all about. Do we need to go over these again so you can find deep peace and happiness or shall we just move on? Or shall we continue to suppose that the admin ought to be perfectly balanced in his posts at all times, and assume that there is
a right and correct way to solve this?
Thora Wrote:Hmm, I'm also not sure this contrasting characterization is warranted. If by "self-immolated" you assume that Nest0r left on principle to make a statement about what they perceived as biased or unfair treatment, that would apply to Bodhisayama as well. But "self-immolation" conveys a sense of irrational, obsessive, extreme self-harm which strikes me as rather unfortunate and unfair editorializing. Bodhisamaya (and people trying to silence criticism) were no less heated in that and subsequent related threads which were closed.
So... much... words.... meaning.... literal truth.... I don't know.... braiiiiin... hurtsssssss....
I'm really sorry, but like I said to IceCream in a private email, I am on a sorta epiphany. If I had better times here, it was because I was trying so hard not to be rejected you see. I was so afraid of having my poor little ego teared to shreds. I will still answer in some way as I do here, but I also don't really give a damn all that much anymore.
So while I question the meaning of words and the nature of thought itself, please forgive me for my lack of prose.
I sense there may be tension here, and I deplore that. And I hope not to create much more tension, it's also plainly evident that this post is really only you and me. Therefore I'm not that all concerned about the liveliness and general mood of the forum. If other members do find my post disturbing, then by all means please PM me (to not derail further and I will take your message with consideration, for real :p).
Thora Wrote:I was actually very surprised, and disappointed, that they left as a result of that thread. As the person who started the thread, I feel some guilt. The forum lost 2 contributors and 2 people quit something they enjoyed. What a shame.
Yes and since they left many new people have registered. Some have participated here. How are we to judge these new members' participation any less relevant than that of a 5000+ post count member?
I'll tell you my real, deep gut feeling about nestOr: he wasn't authentic. Very little came through behind his wall of words. That's what personally annoyed me. It wasn't specifically that he joked in my ufo/alternative topics, really. And why did he post scientific papers on meditation? Was he really interested in it? I doubt it. He seemed more interested in maintaining his "nestOr" profile.
Did he and Bodhi make valuable contributions? Of course they did.
One thing I don't do on this forum, is make "public" recognition of people's contributions.
You see, of course all that would end up doing is create more division.
Just the same way as I can't "moderate" perfectly all the time, I wouldn't be able to recognize people's contribution in a completely balanced way either.
Therefore I try to be neutral towards people's contribution. Therefore I obviously can't "regret" that nestOr or Bodhi are gone when they are plenty of new members who can also make valuable contributions.
This stuff is funny you know. It's exactly like Alan Watts explains. nestOr had to leave precisely because of how he pictured himself. And I "singled him" out precisely because of how I picture him...
Thora Wrote:Not sure I'd consider them a pair. nest0r and bodhisayama were very different personalities who often didn't see eye to eye on issues. [They had different priorities and styles of communication in that thread.] Again, others participating "with a similar dynamic" [if I'm understanding you correctly] did not feel the need to leave.
Haha well that's the big show that Buddhists call "maya". Bodhi and nestOr were essentially both maintaining an identity. Somewhat like experts. What yo ucall "different personalities" are just decorations. The underlying dynamic is the same. But that's probably beyond this topic.
I expressed my gut feeling about nestOr about. I feel that Bodhisamaya was also in a way, maintaining some kind of profile. He had sometimes a good joke, and I really enjoyed his sense of humour, but more often than not it seemed to me his comments were passive aggressive.
This "pair" was constantly making quips and little jokes and passive aggressive comments that were more about themselves than about the subject topic. That's what was getting to my nerves, I think more than anything it's why I "singled them" out in whatever topic it was.
Thora Wrote:[I can understand if you want people to know they weren't banned. I just think it's possible to make that point more objectively.]
Alrighty then. Let's have the literal truth. Let's have the perfect, correct way of doing this. Because the mind assumes there is of course a perfect, correct way of doing things. Let's have it! (no need to argue here, I'm obviously teasing you).