Onelove_yo Wrote:I keep hearing that immersion is just common sense, but I really don't see how that is so(I would be grateful if someone could explain that to me). Common sense would dictate that study is what you should be doing to get better at a language, as most people view learning a language is an academic activity. Actually doing things in the language would be something that you do on the side for fun, something completely separate from study, not something that improves your ability.
The way you say it, it sounds like you are saying that learning a language as an academic activity is similar to say, learning biology or mathematics. In other words, one is learning something for the sake of gaining knowledge.
I see learning language as a tool, a means to an end. I don't care about Japanese, I care about the benefits of Japanese. For some people it's video games, for others it's anime, for others, other things. These examples of Japanese benefits I'm guessing is what you mean by "on the side for fun".
I agree that learning a language is a serious proposition and should be viewed as an academic activity and probably the bulk of it is this. However, doing things on the side for fun (immersion) is not only somewhat enjoyable, but it serves two important purposes:
1) Reinforces and confirms what you know ("improves your ability").
2) Move from the theoretical (textbooks) to the practical. I guess an analogy is reading about science experiments and actually doing it. Two completely different things.
That's my approach at least.
Onelove_yo Wrote:If someone is learning a language traditionally, they will try and watch something, realise they suck, and go back to studying to try and get better so that they can understand it all. It would go against common sense to just keep watching, because watching doesn't make you any better(from their perspective).
I don't think it's a case of sticking with one method (eg. trying to learn from tv shows instead of textbooks).
Ideally, it's a case of:
1) Learn the basics
2) See the basics in practice and reinforce what you have learnt so far
3) Build on the basics to form intermediate
4) See the intermediate levels in practice
5) etc
You should be swapping back and forth repeatedly. I think the main benefit here is context. Seeing what gets used where.
Onelove_yo Wrote:Those things aren't immersion if done only occasionally. Immersion is constant contact with the language.
I don't think it's a case of immersion or no immersion. There are different degrees of immersion.
If you wanted to be 100% immersed, you would move out of your country and live in Japan straightaway, but that's not a realistic scenario for most people.
You simply just have to make do with what you have (Japanese people in real life are in short supply) in appropriate amounts, the weighing up of theoretical/practical which depends on the individual.
Edited: 2011-12-15, 11:30 am