erlog Wrote:There's also the puzzling thing that RTK is already a more efficient version of what people used to do. So the idea that people are trying to make a more efficient or faster version of RTK itself is silly to me.
I'm sure they said the same thing to Heisig. How can innovating an efficient technique to make it more efficient be a silly thing? Now I'm the one who's puzzled.
erlog Wrote:I'm sure there exist some people that can go through RTK in 2 weeks or whatever, but those people in my opinion are such crazy outliers or they're just not telling the truth about how well they know that material.
An accusation! I think we are outliers simply because it hasn't been attempted enough times. I want people to know that it's possible so they can choose if that's what they want to do (or at least have a go at it).
I'm not lying about how well I know the material, but I did leave out what I chose to do shortly (about 20 days) after I finished RTK, which contributes to why I still know it so well. I grabbed the JRTK deck from this forum, modified it to my needs, and gradually suspended kanji from my RTK deck and unsuspended them from my JRTK deck as I encountered the words in my various beginner materials. It's been two months, but I have 480 of the kanji entries reviewing in that deck. I probably have another 200 unique kanji amongst my other decks. I don't think it's too bad for a couple months of work. I've already accepted that I probably won't see a few hundred of the RTK kanji within next year, but I'm glad I didn't have to use any extra effort to learn the 600 or so I've encountered in the last two months. ("Encountered" in this case means within my anki decks, not in the wild. I attempt to read real things every now and then).
For me, that was the whole point of getting it out of the way as soon as possible. I didn't have to stop and learn 600 characters. I already knew them, so I could focus on learning words and grammar. Wasn't that the whole point of RTK? To give you the advantage that Chinese natives had, by being able to recognize the characters and learn the actual language, instead of wasting all your valuable learning time being bogged down by characters? (I think Heisig said this in his book.)
erlog Wrote:Steady, even more than slow, wins the language learning race.
Rapid and consistent also wins the race, but much faster. Whether you can pull it off is another story. There's also no reason to overload on every aspect. I did it with RTK, but now I'm going at a steady pace with my beginner resources. In fact, I've averaged about 90 reviews a day in anki in the last 20 days, because I'm too busy actually learning the material as opposed to "doing" them. I intend to do a vocab grind sometime early January, though. We'll see how that turns out.
erlog Wrote:the question I would ask those of you trying to rush RTK is why you need to know the meaning of kanji you won't ever encounter in your studies until you're into intermediate or advanced level.
You have no way of knowing what you are going to encounter in the future. Unless you are
only using beginner-level textbooks and only intend on using those for the next year. I see a lot of "advanced" kanji in the wild, and I add a bunch into vocab decks if I feel the need to. The real argument here is if there's any point in learning 500 intermediate/advanced characters in advance when you can just learn them yourself as you encounter them. I'm undecided on this. Of course, I can't
unlearn them, and I'm glad I know them now, but I'm not sure if it was worth the effort.
Perhaps being able to trim RTK of advanced characters without removing the ones that make later characters easier to learn is the next evolution of RTK. I don't think RTK lite does that (correct me if I'm wrong).