is there any major difference in the accuracy of these, when it comes to OCR-ing texts?
I'm thinking about getting an OCR program so I can scan some novels and easily make some wordlists for Anki, instead of entering every word manually and looking every Word up on my DS.
I've tried capture 2 text, and while it does a good job and I'm really happy with it, if there is a program that is more accurate, then that's the one I want:p
I've also heard good things about 読んde!!ココ...
I was also wondering, if anyone has used Readiris, whether they've made use of the handwriting recognition feature and how it copes with Japanese handwritten text.... Is it accurate at all?
edit:
apparently I'd be able to get 読んde!!ココ from Amazon Japan... Though I don't even want to think about the amount of tax I'll have to pay:p
and I also see a program called e.typist, which seems a lot cheaper... anyone have any experience with those and would they run on a non-Japan version of Windows?
I'm thinking about getting an OCR program so I can scan some novels and easily make some wordlists for Anki, instead of entering every word manually and looking every Word up on my DS.
I've tried capture 2 text, and while it does a good job and I'm really happy with it, if there is a program that is more accurate, then that's the one I want:p
I've also heard good things about 読んde!!ココ...
I was also wondering, if anyone has used Readiris, whether they've made use of the handwriting recognition feature and how it copes with Japanese handwritten text.... Is it accurate at all?
edit:
apparently I'd be able to get 読んde!!ココ from Amazon Japan... Though I don't even want to think about the amount of tax I'll have to pay:p
and I also see a program called e.typist, which seems a lot cheaper... anyone have any experience with those and would they run on a non-Japan version of Windows?
Edited: 2011-11-30, 11:30 am
