IceCream Wrote:btw, that's a HORRIBLE analogyIs it horrible, or just horribly silly?
IceCream Wrote:btw, that's a HORRIBLE analogyIs it horrible, or just horribly silly?
gdaxeman Wrote:I think this is part of the problem with this discussion. It sounds like there are a lot of students who are of the mindset that $1000 or $60/month is a lot of money. I know, I used to be in that position. Even spending $20 was a lot for me. Students have way more time than money so to them this seems like a definite rip-off because they can just spend their time to learn things.nohika Wrote:As for the "it's just $1000"? Please, please lend me the money so I can spend it like that - for nothing, really. I'm a student and I don't know very many of us with that kind of money.That's the problem: students don't make money. If you want $1000 to be pocket change for you, you need to do things differently.
nadiatims Wrote:Will you ask for your time back too?I don't get this at all. Will my Japanese get worse by doing SilverSpoon?
buonaparte Wrote:matto,I don't see how you can say I'm a radical supporter just for one non-negative post about the program. I've read his site from time to time but don't follow it closely. I heard an interview with him once and couldn't believe it. His speaking was all over the map just like his writing. He could barely stay on one topic for more than a few seconds.
you seem to be Radical Supporter 170. Are you from that Gifu?
(岐阜)
nadiatims Wrote:I don't understand why it annoys you so much that people criticise khatz and his methods. I and I think others have given all sorts of concrete reasons why. Isn't this one of the purposes of the forum?I think it's gone beyond that though - to the point of almost personal attacks. We're just going round in circles - everyone is making the same points over and over. Thing is, as icecream says most of this arguing is against an imagined strawman - that khatz is seen as a guru and has followers who believe everything he says - which I don't think is true. Seeing his site as a positive thing is not the same as believing and following everything he does.
aphasiac Wrote:Also more importantly I think the way people who have actually bought Silverspoon have been treated is pretty disgusting. People have attacked them, implied that they're lazy, unmotivated, stupid, wasting their money etc etc.Where does this happen? I've heard people say that Silverspooners are wasting their money, but I don't recall them being told they are lazy, unmotivated or stupid. (Granted, I don't think I've read through the AJATT Silverspoon thread completely. I've read this one through though.)
Quote:Be supportive. This forum is first and foremost a means for Reviewing The Kanji (RevTK) members, to support, encourage and help each other to complete the Remembering the Kanji (RtK) method.
Because of this, discussions on alternatives or modifications to James Heisig's original method will only be tolerated so long as their are done in a positive manner and aim to help members to reach their goal (be it completing RTK or attaining kanji literacy).
This website is a labour of love, and animosity or competition will not be tolerated.
aphasiac Wrote:Also more importantly I think the way people who have actually bought Silverspoon have been treated is pretty disgusting. People have attacked them, implied that they're lazy, unmotivated, stupid, wasting their money etc etc.Going through the threads a bit again, this seems like a big exaggeration. Nobody has been bullied; nobody has been told they're lazy and unmotivated; nobody has called any forum member stupid (though people have said that doing Silverspoon is stupid, and that Khatz is stupid).
They have basically been bullied and will unlikely ever return here. That's really not how I though this forum worked.
nest0r Wrote:I'm amazed at how reasonable and positive Khatzumoto's critics have been in the face of such unrelenting, often personal negativity. Bravo to Thora and Tzadeck, et al.I wouldn't say there was anything "reasonable and positive" about the OP that started this thread. Are you really surprised it turned into what it is? With an OP like that there's no way it would have sparked a civil debate.
Tzadeck Wrote:hahahIceCream Wrote:btw, that's a HORRIBLE analogyIs it horrible, or just horribly silly?


Offshore Wrote:I wouldn't say there was anything "reasonable and positive" about the OP that started this thread. Are you really surprised it turned into what it is? With an OP like that there's no way it would have sparked a civil debate.quoted for truth.
Offshore Wrote:I would say it's reasonable and positive, or clever, accurate, and amusing; I can't imagine how anyone would find it negative and unreasonable, and it especially doesn't justify the negative, unreasonable comments that threads critical of Khatzumoto always incur. I'm just amazed despite the best efforts to paint Khatz's critics as hysterical and ad hominem and drag these threads through the muck, we've managed to prevent that from happening. Bravo again, RevtKers. ;pnest0r Wrote:I'm amazed at how reasonable and positive Khatzumoto's critics have been in the face of such unrelenting, often personal negativity. Bravo to Thora and Tzadeck, et al.I wouldn't say there was anything "reasonable and positive" about the OP that started this thread. Are you really surprised it turned into what it is? With an OP like that there's no way it would have sparked a civil debate.
aphasiac Wrote:They have basically been bullied and will unlikely ever return here. That's really not how I though this forum worked.It's been like this for quite a while. At least since my join date.
matto Wrote:It was an innocent joke of mine. An explanation is needed, I'm afraid.buonaparte Wrote:matto,I don't see how you can say I'm a radical supporter just for one non-negative post about the program. I've read his site from time to time but don't follow it closely. I heard an interview with him once and couldn't believe it. His speaking was all over the map just like his writing. He could barely stay on one topic for more than a few seconds.
you seem to be Radical Supporter 170. Are you from that Gifu?
(岐阜)
Yes I'm from 岐阜市。
buonaparte Wrote:Could someone please explain it in plain English? What does Khatz offer? What's the content? Are there any samples so that I can have a look?http://www.alljapaneseallthetime.com/blo...-you-there
buonaparte Wrote:It was an innocent joke of mine. An explanation is needed, I'm afraid.Ok, that went way over my head then
One of the names of classical radical 170 is ぎふのふ。 岐阜の阜。 (I just noticed you're from Gifu.)
No worries.
tokyostyle Wrote:There are lots of good links here, but the discussion is always trite, petty and childish.oh tokyostyle, you sure you want to say that.? ;-) Always? "trite, petty, and childish? Well la de dah! haha I often find your posts amusing b/c you're direct and have some entertaining descriptions. But I've had to resist responding to a few that I'd say would win some prizes. Perhaps I should start a new thread to list all those since I'm so popular now. haha
tokyostyle Wrote:I do get my $2 a day out of it but the amount of money he's asking for is so small that it amuses me that someone would make a post that is nothing more than, "Whaaaa I can't afford it so no one should be able to either!"So, I'm envious of Silverspooners because I'm too poor to afford it. And so I made this thread. Why did you post this??
Quote:Why is there no outrage that universities are charging three times what Khatzu is for massively inferior products?A serious question? The Silverspoon product (what product is that exactly?) is massively superior to university class materials? Nope.
Offshore Wrote:I wouldn't say there was anything "reasonable and positive" about the OP that started this thread. Are you really surprised it turned into what it is? With an OP like that there's no way it would have sparked a civil debate.
IceCream Wrote:quoted for truth.Seriously? So maybe I should have attempted a nice little parody with no negativity, no exaggeration, no sarcasm and none of Khatzumoto's own ideas. Right. So now silly attempts at creativity and humour are banned along with negativity and criticism and selected topics?
Offshore Wrote:I wouldn't say there was anything "reasonable and positive" about the OP that started this thread. Are you really surprised it turned into what it is? With an OP like that there's no way it would have sparked a civil debate.
IceCream Wrote:quoted for truth.Apparently satire can be neither reasonable nor positive. Did not realize that. I guess you learn something new every day!