Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,541
Thanks:
4
In general, it kind of looks like it was written by a little kid. But you know, it takes some practice to get some flow.
階 and 飾 both are separated too much from the left part to the right.
屋, 密, and 運 also look pretty funky.
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,582
Thanks:
0
Your す looks like your よ. ;p Your の looks like it was drawn by Dali. Edit: The 。 could be a bit smaller, also.
I think writing the whole sentence and writing for every review is overkill, personally; just pick periodic segments, be it words or words + particles, or phrases that stand out, etc.
Also, give yourself some space and time when you're writing; speed and robustness of your ability to write different sizes and such will derive from this. Have you thought about using those 原稿用紙 sheets?
For my ‘listen’ cards (video clip only) I don't actually do any writing, I leave the writing for when I'm studying words/sentences elsewhere as a kind of supplement.
Edited: 2011-06-16, 6:55 pm
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 42
Thanks:
0
I can read it just fine, looks good to me.
I personally would try to avoid writing on anything else than
karo'd paper, as I tend to write kanji too broad.
The "su" needs a little bit more straightness I'd say, maybe make the whirl smaller or the
vertical part before the whirl a tad bit longer.
Try squeezing kanji just a tad bit tigther on the broadness and don't try
to write "too tidy", because it's the same as with our normal handwriting, we get lazy.
Just some thoughts, not that I'd do any better or something.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,944
Thanks:
11
I didn't think the の was that bad, but your め needs work because it looks like a の that you tried to cross out. The loop needs to cut the top of the stroke.
Overall it looks fine.
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,582
Thanks:
0
The り ought to have that little connection, I think. It's easier to write and looks better. The dots inside/outside thing sounds like a made up rule to me (and if it's not it's silly), re: で, but I don't know, I write it both ways.
Edit: Sorry if I seem grouchy in this thread. Pretend there's a happy emoticon at the end of all my sentences. ;p
Edit: Actually you could put a bit less of a hook at the bottom of your で, and move the marks a bit higher. I'm just going by your handwriting vs. mine, too lazy to look up native samples, so take all my words with a grain of salt. ;p
Edited: 2011-06-16, 8:01 pm
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,582
Thanks:
0
Oh, and on writing/overkill, re: when to choose the periodic writing vs. doing so every time: doing it for recall/recognition when you feel it necessary/feel fuzzy, etc. is why I suggested it, but I wasn't sure if that was your motivation and didn't want to evangelize handwriting as I normally do. ^_^ Since the side effect is still to have nice handwriting, I figured I'd mention it even sans rationale.
Edited: 2011-06-16, 8:37 pm
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,582
Thanks:
0
For the す, I'd recommend (for now) making the loop smaller and closer to the top/beneath the horizontal stroke, and prioritize making the entire thing form something that feels more vertical from top to bottom. That is to say, make sure you've got a substantive piece at the bottom that doesn't deviate too far from the vertical axis to the left or right (though obviously it's naturally going to flow left).
And for the の, I tend to make a straighter line (Edit: still at an angle, though, and not perfectly straight, more of a subtle balance) in the middle to achieve a better circle, using the rigidity of drawing it to sort of pivot around. ;p
Edited: 2011-06-16, 9:05 pm
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 361
Thanks:
0
My handwriting isn't great. But that's horrible. People are being nice but if you wrote that quickly and didn't really care then okay as long as its just for yourself. but if you are writing for someone else, a teacher or a note of things to do etc., that handwriting won't pass the test. Writing as a form of communication to portray an idea needs to be presented in a way that shows the intent of the message. What your handwriting is saying to me is I don't care about what you think and don't really want to be taken seriously. Just practice more and pay more attention to native handwriting or even textbook handwriting and it will better. The proportions are what is making it look bad.
An example of what I'm talking about whenever I write my name it comes out immaculate stylized and neat. The rest of the message may be very much more casual. But when it comes to my name it deserves the attention to be made presentable as it is the most important two or three words I will ever write in my life. My identity in word form. Respect the writing and it gets you respect from readers. I've never been turned down from an application because my forms come out nice.
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,541
Thanks:
4
NoSleepTilFluent, I think you're projecting your own feelings about handwriting onto other people. I'm guessing that the majority of people (in America) don't take it quite so seriously. Your writing style just now came off as sounding weirdly preachy, and I think that's a more important thing to keep in check than how beautifully you write your name. Of course, in special circumstances like job applications writing neatly become much more important in a more concrete way--it's related to success rather than just aesthetic preference. This is more true in Japan, where neatness on job applications is crazily important.
Plus, you seem to be ignoring the fact that arch9443 is a learner, so it's not as if the handwriting looks like that just out of laziness.
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,017
Thanks:
0
You also connect き?! That's quite weird, I've never seen that before outside of screen-fonts. but guess it sort of makes sense..
Your kanji is ok though bit wide. However, I would seriously recommend you go back to basics on your kana, and start practising them again individually. How did you learn them? Try using graph paper, where squares are divided into 4 - that way you can make sure the proportions are correct.
Also personally I would NOT start to do joined up before you are able to write beautiful regular characters. Can you imagine an english learner writing in cursive before they can print nice regular letters? It would look like hell. Joined up should follow automatically after your hands gets so used to writing normally, it just wants to keep flowing. I think you're doing it too soon.
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 946
Thanks:
0
i got the で stuff from the DS software "DS 美文字 トレーニング"
i wouldn't connect り or き or さ. if you write in a cursive style it does come out, and obviously things are different with a brush, but typically you don't see it connected. if you write quickly to take notes, then yeah, it just so happens to be that way, but i wouldn't purposely connect it if only because it's the way i've been taught and i haven't seen otherwise.
as for nosleepuntilfluent's comments:
after watching that NHK special and playing that DS game, i decided to write all my characters super neat, very slowly and with great concentration. on the next vocab quiz in my class, i barely finished half of it before the teacher asked us to turn it in. i had to speed it up after that, haha.
he is right in that some teachers won't pass you unless you can write properly and neatly though, if you do plan on pursuing japanese in a university setting. i think they expect at least some knowledge of aesthetics... things like making 口 into less of a square and more of a trapezoid, the top part of 軍 having a straight left side but a hane on the right side, angling everything up and to the right slightly, etc.
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 150
Thanks:
0
I actually kinda thought that connecting き and さ was the more normal way to do it, and the unconnected version was what people did when they got better. I try to write all my kana the conventional way for now, except for り because writing it separated just feels so unnatural. That's the only one I intentionally changed. I'll try and write the others the more standard way as well.
the other kana that I'm never really sure about is そ because I've seen it written where the first line is more of a drop instead of a line. I'm not sure what's more standard for that one.
It's hard to know what's natural when pretty much the only thing I have constant exposure to is computer fonts. I look up kanji in JDIC to get at least a bit better of an idea of how they should look handwritten. But I've pretty much never seen handwritten kana besides my own.
And I likely won't be dealing with Japanese in an academic setting or anything. I don't really care to much for language classes, in my experience they just suck the fun out of things. They take something I love and actually want to learn about, and make me want to avoid it.
Edited: 2011-06-17, 1:40 am
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 172
Thanks:
0
Maybe some of you can post images of your Japanese handwriting so that those of us who are at the early stages of trying to write (and who are not in Japan) can have an idea of what natural/nice handwriting looks like.