Am I the only one who doesn't think that the OP is doing this for the money he gets for our views? I doubt that would amount to more than a few cents.
But still, maybe he should have lurked a bit more and see what this forum is about before posting. This feels like someone going in a juggling forum and posting "hey, look at this video of me throwing a ball in the air and catching it 1000 times in a row!". Someone might appreciate the patience to have it filmed, but most would be left wondering "yeah, so?".
So, just to reiterate what others have already said, anyone who has gone through rtk1 can do up to grade 8 in that program with ease, and got a good half of those in grade 9 covered too. Some people then decide to go on and complete rtk3, which is another 1000 kanji or so. I know that many of the posters in this forum have been done with rtk1 for a long time, not counting the hundreds of people that use the site to review but don't frequent the forums. Many of these people get through the book in a matter of months, with the occasional user doing a speedrun in a couple of weeks.
That's the audience you are trying to impress.
Just to add to that, most everyone who decide to go through it, considers the whole thing as just a prerequisite step to get started. Or a way to aid them in continuing their studies, if they had already started. Nothing more than a foothold anyway.
There has been a lot of discussion on the topic of English definitions for kanji, with them being possibly misleading, the need to 'forget' them while one gets Japanese vocabulary that can better represent them, etc.
You are basically ignoring all this and saying "hey, I know the readings (???) of some thousands of kanji because I can select the more-or-less-arbitrarily associated meaning from five possible answers".
Multiple choice answers... really?
I was curious so I tried the program, and went on to try grade 0 (the 3841 kanji not in the jouyou list, I guess). Mind you, I don't know anywhere close to 6000 kanji. I completed rtk1 and then forgot about it, according to my vocab deck I've seen maybe a little less then 2500 kanji by encountering them in the wild. For most of them I wouldn't be able to give an English definition, and a lot I wouldn't recognize out of context. So I guess I suck compared to a lot of people here who take kanji (esp. writing) more seriously than me.
So I tried the first 200 or so from rank 0 (randomized). except for maybe 10-15 I hadn't seen any before. Still managed to get an 80% right.
The vast majority where kanji for plants, fish, flowers, insects, it was more or less evident just by looking at the radicals. Since the possible wrong answers seem to be chosen completely at random, it was easy to proceed with some guesswork. Example:
Q: 鯵
A: horse mackerel / rough, clumsy, violent / surprise & confusion / skin, tell, report / arrowhead
I know the kanji in question its actually quite common especially for people living in Japan, but it's the first one the program gave me now. Even without having ever seen it, one could make a reasonable guess and be right.
Someone with a better understanding of the logic behind radicals composition could probably get an high % of correct answers without much effort.
Now, if you get 100% on the whole set in a single session, that's surely impressive.
For starters, I don't think many people would have the perseverance to aim to click almost 4000 in a row without messing up at least once. I know I accidentally double-clicked and got a wrong answer almost immediately after starting.
The time it takes to do it in a sitting would also be impressive, with the pressure of it being recorded and having to start over after a single mistake, even more so.
Of course the learning part would also hold its weight. But most people would be left wondering why on earth one would go out of his way to learn "English definitions" (with all their faults) for such a vast set of kanji.
I doubt anyone would feel inspired.
Sorry for the long post. Back to my lurk bubble I go.
Edit: I guess what I wanted to say was already explained with less rambling in some of the posts before, I need to learn to read better before posting.
Also, it doesn't seem to me that the OP is actually interested in learning Japanese, just “kanji and their definitions”, or maybe I misinterpreted some of his replies.
But in the case I'm right, I'm not sure why he's posting in a forum of Japanese learners...
Edited: 2011-06-04, 9:09 am