Back

J Test compared to JLPT

#1
Does anybody know anything about the J Test and how it compares to JLPT. I'm interested if a lot of companies in Japan recognize the test as a measure of your Japanese ability.

Here's the english site: http://j-test.jp/xp/modules/tinyd10/cont....php?id=11

The lower level seems completely useless. But the upper level classifies your ability into grades and says if you can get in the 900-1000 range you are on the level of an interpreter.

This is my first time hearing of it.
Reply
#2
http://www.jref.com/forum/showthread.php?t=24181

Be sure to check out the link in post 15.

I wouldn't know anything about companies' recognition of it. My guess is that it's a lot less known than the JLPT among employers.
Edited: 2011-04-24, 7:14 pm
Reply
#3
It is worthless to take unless you are looking for personal satisfaction.

The JLPT is the government approved gold standard among companies and universities interested in working with foreigners.
Edited: 2011-04-24, 11:01 pm
Reply
May 16 - 30 : Pretty Big Deal: Save 31% on all Premium Subscriptions! - Sign up here
JapanesePod101
#4
Nothing is worthless. Having two certifications on your resume looks better than one, even if you have to explain what it is in an interview.

However, I would recommend taking BJT instead. It is more widely recognized than JTEST, is harder than JLPT1 to get the top level, and is directly applicable to working in a Japanese office environment (it's more a test of applying Japanese than a test OF Japanese).

RE: JTEST levels
Even getting 100% is NOWHERE near enough to be an interpreter, but it is slightly harder than JLPT1 at the top end.
Edited: 2011-04-25, 5:59 am
Reply