Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,083
Thanks:
32
Adding comments to every page doesn't make a meaningful or valuable community.
What I ask myself when seeing the website is: what is the added value compared to the other hundreds of websites out there that already reprint EDICT/KANJIDIC data?
As far as I can see (without registering) the website reprints KANJIDIC/EDICT data without making it more user friendy than WWWJDIC.
It looks like a good effort, but I wonder about the motivation when seeing the asinine domain name, slogan "Learn japanese kanji online!" and Google Ads. Not that there is anything wrong with getting paid for your work, but the way it is put together it looks like a web app equivalent of a content farm. I just frankly wouldn't feel like using this at all, because I see no value to it.
PS: it's my fairly blunt feedback to a fairly blunt 1st post. I reckon it is a bit negative but I think I raised valid concerns/questions, and so it qualifies as constructive feedback. :/
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,533
Thanks:
0
Fabrice's (slightly harsh) comments stand on their own. Other than those bits...
The site has a lot of spelling/grammar mistakes in English. At least, on almost every page I went to.
I found the site easy to navigate and visually appealing.
The test is annoying because it makes you click something to go to the next item. It should show you the results of the previous one while asking the next one.
The font for the kanji is ugly. It's probably because I don't have the first few listed and it's using a rather poor substitute. You should probably add some more common (pretty) fonts to the list.
Search doesn't recognize romaji. (I'm too lazy to switch to kana when searching. Computers are much easier to navigate in English.)
Some things (names of lists, at least) didn't get translated into English.
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,319
i like the kanji test idea. it seems like a good way to find holes in your memory & concentrate on the ones that need something extra without going through all of them in anki...
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 16
Thanks:
0
Moi aussi j’ai visité ton site, et ça me semble plutôt bien organisé. Le seul commentaire que je puisse faire, c’est que, comme Fabrice l’a dit, il existe déjà pas mal de sites qui offrent le genre d’informations qui se trouvent sur ton site (un bel example serait ce site même – Remembering the Kanji – particulièrement en ce qui concerne les histoires mnémotechniques). Donc en regardant ton site, je me demandais: qu’est-ce qu’il y a sur ce site que je ne peux pas trouver ailleurs? Les sites que j’utilise le plus sont ceux qui offrent quelque chose d’unique ou d’une qualité exceptionnelle.
En plus, je viens de regarder la version anglophone du site. Moi, en tant qu'américaine qui adore la langue française (et les langues en general), je comprends combien c’est difficile de s’exprimer dans une langue étrangère. Cela dit, nous les anglophones sommes plutôt gâtés et moins susceptibles de fréquenter un site avec trop de fautes d’orthographes/de grammaire. J’aime bien l’idée d’avoir une version française et anglaise du site, mais ce serait peut-être une bonne idée de faire corriger la version anglophone par… un anglophone pour mieux attirer… les anglophones.
Sorry, just wanted to practice some French. To summarize: the site looks well organized. I guess my only thought is that because there is so much information out there and there are so many sites to choose from, having something that makes your site stand out is important. Even if your site is well organized, if it doesn’t pique people’s interest with unique content, it’s less likely to become a site that people go back to on a regular basis, if only because there are only so many sites people can regularly devote their time to. The sites I continuously go back to tend to have something unique or something that is of higher quality than what I’ve seen elsewhere (this site/forum here is a perfect example!). To put it another way, when I went to your site my first thought was: it seems like I can already get most of this information from the Remembering the Kanji site. I wonder what’s here that would make me want to come back?
Hope that didn’t sound too harsh. The site is well put together, easy to navigate, and I can see how it could be of use to those studying kanji. For those of us who are familiar with sites such as Fabrice’s though, being able to easily identify how it differs from other sites out there would be a plus.
Edited: 2011-04-15, 6:59 pm
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,083
Thanks:
32
I did register on your site. One problem was that you have lots of actions tied to icons, but there is little explanation as to what the icons do or how it is connected together. Many icons didn't have labels, for example.
There seemed to be quite a bit of useful functionality, but it was difficult to tell where to start or where to click next. I created a list, if I remember well, but couldn't find how to review it.
It seemed to me most of the text was a very tiny font. Overall look at the design in terms of information. When you pick a font for example, how big the font size is, tells the user how important the information is. What should the users first notice on the page? Make that big. If something is not very important, if it is secondary information, make it smaller. Likewise, if it's important, use contrasting colours, if it's secondary, use subdued colours. Etc.
You have a point with the French language. I don't know about the availability of kanji study web apps in French. In English though you have a lot of competition.
ファブリス is being very kind I think considering your first post is essentially an advertisement. I hope you have a donation coming his way.
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 3
Thanks:
0
Yes, it's totally right, my post can be see like advertisement... was not realy my goal, just wanted some qualities feedback, because I did not know if my program was interesting or not.
Put google ads was probably a error because the site can appear like something it's not. I have removed them and the link too.
thank for yours advises! was be usefull for me. Meaby I will try to redirect more on french audience or someting like that.
Edited: 2011-04-17, 1:01 pm