My biology test: Made 250 cards. Reviewed them( rated hard or failed) every day and Went through all the cards on the last day + Read the book.
TOTAL REVIEW TIME: 4 hours.
+ making those cards for maybe even 4-6 hours.
Got something like 65% on the test.
There was a lack of cards + I didn't remember the facts that well(used cloze deletion and that List thing where you add 5 items and cloze delete 1 of them). It was quite complicated to remember facts.
Art History test: did the same thing. 130 cards with pictures and stuff.
TOTAL REVIEW TIME: 2h + making cards about 4 hours.
Didn't read the book.
Got about 70%
Again, lack of cards. Most of the stuff I learnt I remembered well, but I didn't have enough cards.
All in all the adding of those cards was very time-consuming. It took at least as much time adding them, as reviewing them in total.
If I'd compare it to just reading the text, I think doing it with anki is more time-consuming(with adding). But in case of there being good cards, It will probably take less time.
TOTAL REVIEW TIME: 4 hours.
+ making those cards for maybe even 4-6 hours.
Got something like 65% on the test.
There was a lack of cards + I didn't remember the facts that well(used cloze deletion and that List thing where you add 5 items and cloze delete 1 of them). It was quite complicated to remember facts.
Art History test: did the same thing. 130 cards with pictures and stuff.
TOTAL REVIEW TIME: 2h + making cards about 4 hours.
Didn't read the book.
Got about 70%
Again, lack of cards. Most of the stuff I learnt I remembered well, but I didn't have enough cards.
All in all the adding of those cards was very time-consuming. It took at least as much time adding them, as reviewing them in total.
If I'd compare it to just reading the text, I think doing it with anki is more time-consuming(with adding). But in case of there being good cards, It will probably take less time.
