Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 667
Thanks:
0
Well, here's the deal. Learning is going to take time no matter what, and it doesn't much matter that you don't have the luxury of it. There are good ways and better ways for learning, but not really a ton of bad ways aside from brute force.
I believe that RTK does the best job in terms of bootstrapping Japanese language learners with an understanding of kanji. The understanding of kanji you will have through RTK is equivalent to what many Japanese language learners many years ago had to get through with years upon years of brute force. RTK primes your brain with kanji first, and in itself makes learning Japanese more efficient for users of it.
You also don't necessarily have to ever finish RTK for it to beneficial. It can be combined with traditional instruction very easily, and after a short while they'll start coinciding very helpfully. At first it's going to be annoying because a lot of the kanji coming from RTK won't show up in a regular textbook until much much later, but there comes a time at about the end of the first volume of whichever textbook series you're using where about 50% of what you've been studying using RTK will overlap with about 50% of what you're learning in the traditional order.
You'll also shock and delight any Japanese teacher you have with your understanding of complex kanji and knowledge of radicals. Not all of the elements Heisig uses are radicals, but enough of them are that Heisig is very beneficial even if you never learn all the official radicals. If anything, Heisig tends to manufacture too many of his own radicals. So all the usual radical suspects should be represented very well through Heisig.
The "divide and conquer" learning method for kanji will also help you in traditional kanji study so you'll be able to learn new kanji in a more traditional setting more easily than you otherwise would have if you hadn't done Heisig.
Edited: 2011-04-04, 11:58 am
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,049
Thanks:
4
I had that book.
I actually posted a review on that amazon page as well.
If you are already doing remembering the kanji, I really can't recommend that book at all, because you aren't going to get anything additional from it, except maybe a few pages detailing about how to do stroke order correctly.
It only covers 250 kanji. You can easily learn that many in a week with RTK.
And, the book doesn't really give you any method for learning the characters, other than the traditional way of writing them over and over, and maybe a few exercises.
Its a fine resource if you only want to get your feet wet, but what are you going to do after you learn those 250 kanji?
Edited: 2011-04-04, 12:15 pm
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,541
Thanks:
4
I passed 2kyuu with Heisig as my only real studying of the kanji. In fact, I found the kanji questions to be the second easiest part of the test, the listening being the easiest. Taking N1 in July (although I think I'll fail because my vocabulary is too low). I mean, if you're doing 2kyuu, you need to know a shit-ton of kanji, so it's not like you can learn them overnight anyway. Isn't the reason people do Heisig speed of learning? It takes forever to learn 1,000 kanji by most methods.
Edited: 2011-04-04, 11:44 pm
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,541
Thanks:
4
Out of curiosity, how long does adding five kanji take you?
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 13
Thanks:
0
about 30 minutes. I also practice writing it over and over again. I want to be able to not just read but also write kanji.
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,219
Thanks:
0
The main purpose of the RTK method is to remember how to write the characters. And one of its benefits is that you don't have to copy them over and over to remember them.
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 13
Thanks:
0
I found the Let's Learn Kanji: An Introduction to Radicals, Components book in the library and I think I'll try this one out. I'll learn the radicals first, then I can learn the Kanji by combining the radicals. Through the radicals, I can also make stories for the kanji using the Heisig method.
But I will be learning the kanji with the readings and in the order of frequency of usage.
From the first few introductory pages, the book is showing some samples:
晴(cloudless)、清(pure)、精(spirit) - since they have the same component on the right, all three have same ON reading (SEI)
反(opposite) - ON reading (HAN)
坂(slope), 飯(meal), 板(board) - same component on the right, can you guess the ON reading for all 3?
answer: HAN
Edited: 2011-04-05, 9:26 am
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 474
Thanks:
0
You should do whatever you feel works best, I'm just curious about how this would be more efficient for you than RTK though. Learning the radicals and then combining them with stories/mnemonics for learning kanji is basically what the RTK method is, but you're emphasizing the writing and meanings for the radicals and you're not learning them in an order that makes them easier to learn. How would this be quicker than RTK straight up if you only can spend half an hour a day anyway?
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 13
Thanks:
0
I guess I'll just have to try it and see for myself
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,049
Thanks:
4
I don't quite get what you are doing here. For some reason you can only do about 5 kanji a day with RTK, and thats not fast enough... but by learning all the radicals up front, you will somehow be able to meet your goal?
If you learn 5 radicals per day, that's at least 40 days until you learn them all, and then you still haven't learned a single kanji by that point!