Terence Mckenna is the author of a mathematical theory of the novelty in history.

He based it on one of the oldest of the Chinese classic texts, I Ching ""

He's already dead for 12 years, and his theory is quite old (1970).

I'm not saying that I approve of this theory or that I have researched it enough, but perhaps someone might find it interesting or useful.So don't blame me or anything.

"Timewave zero" is a numerological formula that purports to calculate the ebb and flow of "novelty", defined as increase in the universe's interconnectedness, or organised complexity, over time.


The more the graph goes down, the more novelty and complexity.

According to this theory, after this Japanese earthquake there will be even more events and perhaps technological advancement in the near future, as compared to the last months before the earthquake.

One thread on Timewave zero and the 8.9 Earthquake in Japan.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread673977/pg1

Where'd you get that calculator from?

Oh, sorry I should have put the link. You can also download the software.
http://timewave2012.com/tools/calculator/


This article first appeared as an appendix (pages 211-220) in The Invisible Landscape (2nd edition, HarperCollins, 1993) by Terence and Dennis McKenna. Although there are objections to the timewave zero theory considered as a scientific theory, the mathematics underlying the theory is valid. The theory may be explored in detail by use of the Fractal Time software.
http://www.fractal-timewave.com/articles...twz_10.htm'

He went to all kinds of lectures, saying that he waits/is looking for a person, who can find a fault in his theory and prove that he's overlooked something.

But he died without that kind of a person appearing.

[ファブリス]

2012 and the "Watkins Objection" to Terence McKenna's "Timewave Theory"
http://www.realitysandwich.com/watkins_objection

Sheds a little light on the origin of the theory.

I've seen a lot of discussions matching world events with the graph, the problem is there is always going to be interpretation. The timeline itself does not describe any specific events.

loooool. well, i agree, earthquakes are hardly novel, but...

Related: 2012: Carnival of Bunkum

“The technoculture journalist Xeni Jardin sharpens the point of debate. While Jardin is no expert on, or spokesperson for, the Mayan people, she is well-positioned to reveal the 2012 phenomenon for the carnival of bunkum it is. Her adoptive father is ‘of indigenous descent,’ she told me in an e-mail interview, and working with his nonprofit in Guatemala, ‘doing cultural and philanthropic work’ for the country’s indigenous peoples, has brought Jardin into close contact with the Maya. ‘We work to help these communities sustain their culture and social integrity,’ she says, providing microloans and scholarships, working to bring clean drinking water and healthcare to the villages.

When I asked her what she thought of Pinchbeck’s invocation of Mayan beliefs, and of the 2012-ers’ use of the Maya in general, she was blunt. ‘What makes me angriest about Pinchbeck’s bogus, profiteering bullshit isn’t so much him, but the fact that that many people are racist enough to believe any leprechaun white guy who declares himself an expert in Mayan culture. Did it ever occur to anyone to ask practicing Maya priests out in the villages? [...] It absolutely enrages me that while people I know in Guatemala, traditional priests, are struggling to figure out how to provide clean drinking water to their families, how to feed their communities, how to avoid being shot by the gangs and thieves that plague the roads more than ever—while they’re struggling to survive and keep their communities intact, leprechaun like Pinchbeck are making a buck off of white man’s parodies of their culture.’”

Edit: And in case it wasn't clear, McKenna's theory, mathematically and otherwise, is nonsense, and was revealed as such decades ago.

Will this let me predict the stock market?