LazyNomad Wrote:Let`s not downplay it. It is the next worst thing after Chernobyl.
That's only because Chernobyl was the only truly serious nuclear accident (well, there were others, but they're not as large in the public consciousness). The estimated number of people who died from the Three Mile Island accident is less than one.
People are saying it's "nearly" as bad as Chernobyl because Chernobyl was a 7 on the scale and this is being called probably a 6 (we won't really know until its over). That's like saying an 8 earthquake is nearly as bad as a 9. The scale isn't linear, and isn't even numeric at all. If you read the descriptions, there is an *enourmous* difference between a 6 and a 7. 7 basically means the thing pukes tones of highly radioactive gunk into the atmosphere. I don't think that's even being considered a worst case possibility, much less a probability.
Nuclear accidents are scary. Clearly, this one has eaten into far more layers of defense than one would hope. But until it eats through the the last one, the actual consequences on the outside world are minor. There is confusion as to what is actually breeched when they talk about damage to containment. There are multiple levels of containment. Which exactly was breeched... that's unclear. Unless they all are, the effects of a meltdown will be contained. What happened at Chernobyl wasn't a meltdown, a meltdown was part of the story. Chernobyl was a boiler explosion at a reactor without any sort of secondary containment, followed by a large power excursion (read: small, inefficient nuclear explosion, estimated at 0.01 kT) that threw a large amount of the material in the core into the atmosphere. This was possible because the Chernobyl accident occurred when the reactor was actually active and is not possible at Fukushima for that reason alone (reactor design also makes it impossible due to moderator differences).
There is a lot of confusion in the media over a radiation level being X times over the normal background level vs X times over a safe level. Human beings can handle radiation far above background levels before its considered harmful, and even then you're talking increased risk of cancer, not radiation poisoning. The majority of the media seems to fundamentally (or deliberately) not understand what's going on.
Edited: 2011-03-15, 4:40 pm