Joined: May 2009
Posts: 319
Thanks:
0
Well. I hope they bring it up in the original paper but there seems like there could be quite a lot of interference from exhaustion effects...
"In both groups, half the volunteers were told immediately following the tasks that they would be tested in 10 hours. In fact, all participants were later tested on how well they recalled their tasks.
Some, but not all, of the volunteers were allowed to sleep between the time they learned the tasks and the tests. As the authors expected, the people who slept performed better than those who didn't. But more importantly, only the people who slept and knew a test was coming had substantially improved memory recall. "
Ten hours awake means that, optimally, the ones who weren't allowed to sleep did the test in the morning and then a second time in the late afternoon. Since most of us tend to perform poorly when we are getting sleepy and better when we do something right after a good night's rest or even just a nap, it's likely that that is the main reason these results were obtained. The same problem can be found in this line of reasoning:
""The more slow wave activity the sleeping participants had, the better their memory was during the recall test 10 hours later," Born said. Scientists have long thought that sleep is important in memory consolidation. The authors suggest that the brain's prefrontal cortex "tags" memories deemed relevant while awake and the hippocampus consolidates these memories during sleep. "
The more relaxed the participants were able to become, the better their subsequent performance was. It's a gross simplification of deep sleep to reduce it to a mere memory-consolidating phase and other benefits from more deep sleep are bound to have a considerable effect.
The only part that could tell us something, IMO, would be:
"The researchers also recorded electroencephalograms (EEG) from the individuals who were allowed to sleep. They found an increase in brain activity during deep or "slow wave" sleep when the volunteers knew they would be tested for memory recall. "
And I find even this to be highly susceptible to demand characteristics. "Hmm I was told earlier that I'm gonna be tested and now they want me to go to sleep. I probably should make sure I get a good rest so I can do better next time!" vs "Hmm so I just did this test and now they want me to sleep? Okay I guess" or something like that.
This isn't so much criticism aimed at the original report as it is criticism at how, when scientific findings are to be reported by popular outlets they are often so trimmed that almost all value is lost and all that's left is "hey look these researchers say that this thing happens!". I understand that there's a need for simplified reports, but I really think they can do better than this (and sometimes they DO, of course)