Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 374
Thanks:
0
did you watch the game? Australia missed so many chances you'd think it was on purpose. Japan spent probably 80% of the game in their own half with the occasional counter-attack. They were lucky Harry kewell played horribly, he probably missed 10 shots even just a couple years back at his peak he'd have buried.
Good taken goal tho, they won but it was more Australia that lost than Japan won tbh. Hero keeper, he took a kicking the entire game, got floored like 3-4 times at least.
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,582
Thanks:
0
Actually by that logic apparently they're the best in the world. ;p Anyway, I think it's meaningless and sort of rude to say things like "it's not that so-and-so won, it's that their opponent lost" unless the one effectively slipped on a banana peel at a crucial moment. Even then it's not quite cricket unless Japan in turn slipped on a banana peel and accidentally scored a goal. I didn't watch the match, but from what I've read Japan felt they had a lot of missed chances and negative factors too. Regardless, both teams were playing, and Japan scored the winning point, and a very nice one at that.
That said, it's not that the other teams won the World Cup, it's that Japan lost. ;p
Edited: 2011-01-31, 4:02 pm
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 369
Thanks:
0
A team wins on its own volition, and that's what Japan did. As for Australia being in the Asian Cup, I have to say I don't agree with it because Australia is not part of Asia. I understand that the OFC provides no challenge whatsoever, but I still cannot agree with a system in which countries just "swap" continents when it's convenient.
Edited: 2011-01-31, 5:58 pm