Jarvik7 Wrote:Gimmicky handheld is gimmicky.
Then again the DS' touch functionality is also just a gimmick that so far hasn't enhanced gameplay at all (except for education software) and same for the Wii with a very few exceptions.
Surely you're trolling here right?!
DS paved the way for many new games that had never been done before (Nintendogs, Pac-Pix, Drawn to Life, *any* drawing type game), and certainly enhanced many games - i can't imagine playing text/picture adventures like Phoenix Wright without touch?
I'm currently playing through Zelda: Spirit Tracks and it's totally drawing based, and so good for it; probably one of my favourite Zelda games of all time (simply cos it has all new touch based items and puzzles).
DS developers don't have to use it, and some don't, that's the cool thing; it's there if you need it. Being a useless "gimmick" doesn't explain the popularity of games on iPhone (all touch based) and the PSP2 having a touch screen.
TheVinster Wrote:Nobody could get me to waste $250 on a gimmicky 3D device.
Now is a 3D display "gimmicky"? Well yes, but then you could argue that about any graphical upgrade; Why bother with 3D polygons, or colour screen - it doesn't add anything to the game-play? If it makes the experience more immersive then surely it's worth it. Plus I'm sure they'll be games that use it, and can't be done on any other system.
For the 3DS I'm more interested in the 3D camera functionality; 3D photos and video, that's futuristic star-trek sh#t! Never thought I'd see this day..
Edited: 2011-02-02, 11:29 am