Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,879
Thanks:
19
It's not about learning factually wrong stuff, it's about focusing too much just on the skill set that passing N2 required to the detriment of some of my other skills. (Speaking/writing.)
Reading/listening/vocab-wise, I was fine. I could read and listen to all kinds of stuff. I just couldn't do output for squat, mostly because there wasn't any time for it. Now it's not so much of a problem for me, but 6 months ago, it was bad. It took a lot of work to get to the speaking/writing level I probably would have been at had I studied in a more responsible/balanced manner. That's all I meant by that.
I did the majority of my JLPT studying in the US, and I made the conscious choice to cut out the conversational stuff, and use that time for test prep. I passed the test, so that's good. But it wasn't necessarily smart. That's all I was getting at.
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 675
Thanks:
0
Hmmm I think that's fine to be honest, you pretty much need to know everything in N2 to speak or write about anything in a half decent manner anyway.. although I do think it's good to raise all skills at about the same level in general.
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,184
Thanks:
0
N2 passed.
B grade for both sections.
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 567
Thanks:
0
congrats jettyke! How has your japanese evolved since you arrived in Japan? Way better than N2 now I bet!
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 130
Thanks:
0
A year on from doing N1 I'd say that although preparing for it helped to improve my Japanese, mostly in terms of giving me a goal to aim for, there were some areas where it proved a bit of a hindrance.
The first would be that it encourages you to focus completely on reading and listening rather than speaking and reading, so the later skills improve proportionately slower.
Another major flaw I think is that it encourages a very superficial knowledge of words and grammar. If you know roughly what a word means then that is usually enough to guess the answer to a multiple choice question. Yes you need to know roughly what a grammar point means, but there is almost no need to know when that grammar structure is used compared to other similar ones, for example in terms of how formal it is.
Edited: 2012-02-14, 5:25 pm
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 536
Thanks:
0
Has anyone got their results in the US / EU yet?
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3
Thanks:
0
This question is probably slightly topic and a bit daft, but does the proctor just play every listening passage once at the same time for everyone or do you get to hear it multiple times? I'm assuming it's just once but I would like to think otherwise. Do you get to choose when to do the listening, or is it at a predetermined time? Sorry for the silly questions, but it's been surprisingly hard to find such details on the net.
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5
Thanks:
0
Took the N1 just to test the waters (took and passed N2 last summer), and ended up passing.
Language Knowledge: 23/60
Vocabulary: B
Grammar: B
Reading: 43/60
Listening: 50/60
Total: 116/180.
Anyone else have that problem where you can read and understand passages but don't know the readings for a lot of kanji compounds you come across? That's what really pulled down my language knowledge score, I'm pretty sure.
I'm happy to have passed, but I feel kind of strange about it. I had always thought that by the time I could pass N1 I would be pretty awesome at Japanese, but I don't quite feel like I'm there yet... Oh well!
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 23
Thanks:
0
I thought you had to get 80% or more to pass N1, is it only 60%?
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 946
Thanks:
0
lol i passed
42/60 vocab/grammar
23/60 reading
26/60 listening
passed by 2 points. looks like i mastered the useless part of japanese.
i don't even know how my listening score topped my reading score...