Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 946
Thanks:
0
One time my personal blog got linked off the AJATT twitter.
My hits went from 4 a day to 360 something. Then back down to 4 because I don't write a lot.
Anyway, I stopped thinking in total time and started thinking with actual time.
When I think about it, I only study Japanese for like an hour at the most, every day.
If I could study for 3-4 hours a day, for 18 months, damn, I bet I'd be super good too. If only...
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 589
Thanks:
0
That's possible, but when we're talking about Computer Science, how hard could it be to find someone who speaks Japanese and can program in C++ or whatever coding language needed?
CS is not that unique of a job, I'm sure Japan is flooding with CS majors.
However I do admit it's possible he could be in some sort of position that involves working as a bridge with American companies or perhaps working with English speaking coders or something, which requires his English ability and not his Japanese.
So, really, like you said, it's all up in the air.
It could be shady marketing, but I like to believe what he's done is legit just for motivation for myself. Also, it's not like he's come up with nothing. He's at least got his products, which are basically very simple, but show that he's at least done some work (I'm thinking of the "My First Sentence Pack" which is 500 essential SRS sentences before you start to mine your own).
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,313
Thanks:
22
Guys, seriously, it's best not to debate at how skilled Khatzumoto was when he was 23 getting a job in Japan.
One, it's been done 20 or 30 pages back and on other forums.
Two, we've only his posts to give as evidence on the matter, which still get misquoted.
Three, that he could have easily posted plenty of evidence of his growing ability: writing practice, speaking practice, srs deck, etc and chose not to points that he probably likes the ambiguity.
Four, he still didn't do it for his Chinese learning (that I know about) to at least gauge his progress AFTER his method became popular.
Five, we've got plenty of people here that've done great by experiencing lots of Japanese AND lotsa studying (Zorlee, IceCream, Kazelee). These people are willing to post their growing abilities as time goes on. Yeah, it's embarrassing but damn it they've been willing to do it to show it can be done and does work.
Ask me, we should talk about the AJATT method here. That normally involves Sentence Method, SRS, and experiencing life in Japanese (mostly from entertainment) as much as you can create it. Want to talk about if AJATT works, I think we have plenty of people that can give honest answers from personal experience.
Edited: 2010-09-20, 4:38 am
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 70
Thanks:
0
Constant sentence miming has worked for me in terms of being able to read Japanese, however my speaking and listening ability is far behind. I still struggle to read the news with all its long 漢字 words, but I've progressed using the method.
That's my personal experience.
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,174
Thanks:
0
You know, I think I know why he might have not posted his details for Chinese. He didn't want to argue about it. When we learn something to a good extent and claim it. Everyone is going to ask for proof of some sort.
I believe any amount of proof I give, will eventually be turned down somewhat. In the end, the only person who's able to call you fluent is yourself.
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,313
Thanks:
22
Personally, if you're posting a diary of some sort (written, audio or video) over time then individual opinions of your abilities is irrelevant. What you have is something NATIVES can look at and give a reasonable critique.
Yeah, I can hear people on boards bitch and moan about such and such speaker, however if I hear enough natives make positive comments about a person's speaking and writing then I'm fairly sure I can depend on that critique. I've seen positive comments about Khatzumoto, IceCream, Zorlee's and others submitted Japanese ability. I have no doubt about their ability, which is too far above me to gauge anyway.
To be honest Ta12121, that's been part of the reason I've been prodding you to submit more work. Yeah, not something daily, but maybe a monthly video or paragraph so natives that visit this board can give honest dope about your progress. In addition, that gives ammunition against naysayers that just want to downplay anything.
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,322
Thanks:
0
Yeah, I've been wanting to see something from ta12121 as well. Not because I want to prove him wrong or anything, but I'm legitimately curious as to how far he's come in the short amount of time he's been studying. I know he uses words that I would never use in real life (just based on the sentences he's posted here and there).
He says his production is below-par...so is mine, and I think it's a general thing. But even something like that mock-JLPT he was going to take, for recognition, and perhaps a diary, video, something to actually gauge progress (if not just for his own sake).
As for claiming to be fluent...People say I'm fluent all the time, but this is coming from people who only speak English. People in Japan say I'm 'conversant,' but can't read too well. Me? I say I've got a long way to go until I'm satisfied (never...?)
Khatz...Something about me bugs him. I think it's his attitude and writing style. He did an interview with someone on youtube and he seemed like an OK guy, but when he's on his own -- he just doesn't click with me. He gives off the impression that a lot of his claims are exaggerated. But whatever.
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,322
Thanks:
0
I get he whole "did itfirst names it" thing, but what he does is really just a bunch of methods combined into one name. He wasn't the one who invented srs, learning from native materials, immersion, or having fun. He just studied a lot, lik any other language learner. He just made a website and (humorously) boasted about how fast he learned, and people say it's a "method."
I don't consider myself to be following AJATT, despite doing the same things, because I came up with or discovered it all on my own or separate sources.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 13
Thanks:
0
If you read his site though he admits he didn't come up with the method and that he just did what he thought would work based on other sites like Antimoon.
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,174
Thanks:
0
True, it's basically all common sense but he put it together in his own way, by taking the best of everything.