Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 563
Thanks:
4
So when are we going to get some reviews in here?
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 107
Thanks:
0
REVIEW!
I asked for it, but I just bought it and read it. I figured I could give the man 10 bucks for all the wisdom I've gotten from him.
My advice for anyone who is already sentence-methoding, etc, has their groove going to any degree past doing RTK is to not buy it (unless you want to give Khatz some money as a thank you). It's pretty much in tune with what he says on the site, and if you've read the site then you got the better end of the info.
That being said, it is an extremely simplified version of the site with specific steps. It's 45 pages total but it's not dense, it's like a 45-slide Powerpoint presentation. He gives step by step instructions on how to do the basics. It was really boring to read because I already knew everything on the site.
The only new info seems to come from what he's gleaned from "The Talent Code" and "Talent is Overrated". The idea of a distinction between active work and passive work (he calls it pedaling vs. coasting). He says both are important but that you can only pedal for a couple hours a day, the rest should just be coasting.
WRT sentence method, it's the simple "full kanji sentence" and produce the reading, and then bilingual/monolingual definitions in the text. He doesn't mention anything about writing down kanji from sentences or doing kana-kanji. The articles outlining those SRS methods were also taken down from his site's table of contents. I suspect that his conclusion may have been that they don't fit with the "bubble wrap" feeling of SRSing when it takes so long to do a single SRS rep, which also ties into Quantity over Quality. But that's just a guess.
Anything else you guys want to know?
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 253
Thanks:
0
Khatzu's whole thing from day 1 was to "earn some cash" while providing a service - his AJATT method. It's in his 1st or 2nd post way back.
I'm not knocking him for it. Hell, he prolly put a crap load of work into that site. But, I find the site more of a motivator, then a guide. Technically, it has all the info you need to understand the method, but for me it shines in other areas.
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 155
Thanks:
0
To step in here a bit and defend tobberoth. All he was making "sweeping judgements" about were the few people who will inevitably latch onto what Khatz says and follows him credulously. Whether or not Khatz tells people not to take it like a bible, you all know that people are generally stupid and look for something simple that they can latch onto without thinking. That's all tobberoth was ridiculing. Sorry if I overstepped my bounds. However, I really hate it when people jump into euber-defensive mode for no demonstrable reason
Edited: 2009-08-01, 12:34 am
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,030
Thanks:
0
Hmm. Tobberoth pointed out a widespread and serious problem among AJATT followers, and Khatzumono addressed it in a powerpoint-like booklet. Sounds like a solid QRG for lazy people.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,851
Thanks:
0
While there are undoubtably AJATT followers who are sane, the most vocal ones are all cultists.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,851
Thanks:
0
Hahaha...
1) I'm not jealous of anyone nor do I hate khatz. I do however disagree with some of what he says and think he's a bad (verbose) writer.
2) I won't want to waste my time blogging and have no desire for a following.
3) I'm not negative, I call things as I see them.
4) One does not need to produce X in order to criticize X. ex: Movie critics are not film directors. ex2: Khatz criticized university Japanese classes and yet he is not a university professor.
5) The particular post to which you reply was criticizing people who are cultists, not khatz.
6) You need to accept that not everyone has the same opinions that you hold. If you disagree with something I say, argue the point instead of shouting like a child.
This is an academic forum. Academics is about criticism. Criticism allows ideas, theories, resources, tools, etc to improve. By criticizing cultism it encourages individual rational thought instead of blind acceptance.
Edited: 2009-08-01, 3:51 am
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,851
Thanks:
0
Maybe you're a closet cultist who had too much koolaid today.
I was actually kind of surprised that you wrote that but it never occurred to me that it was sarcasm. I was more like "Et tu, nest0r?"
I blame the fact that it's 2am and I've been poking around in SQL databases and python for a few hours.
Edited: 2009-08-01, 4:11 am
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,851
Thanks:
0
yousa like trolling!
donate to me too plz
By the way I am probably the most well-known ajatt critic here. That would make me the opposite of what you just called me. Good job.
You apparently "are like that" telling by how you respond to criticism that doesn't even have anything to do with you.
Edited: 2009-08-01, 6:20 am