When learning complicated new Kanji I am sometimes concerned that maybe a group of radicals frequently repeats other characters and it makes sense to give that group an aggregate meaning.
For example, "turkey" and "feathers" appear very frequently, and many RTKers including myself have grouped them into the meaning of "mattress" (see the character 曜). The problem is that you often don't know in advance what is going to end up getting grouped later on, especially once you move past the scope of RTK1 + RTK3.
I wrote a script to attempt automatic primitive discovery by systematically looking at what radicals are in common between various characters. For example, if you were to input 贅 you would discover that 敖 is a common component of this character and many other characters, and could assign it a new meaning. I'm still messing around with the way Kanji are rated, so it's not perfect or anything.
You can check it out here: http://foosoft.net/cgi-bin/kanji.py
What do you guys think? Cool? Lame? Whatever?
For example, "turkey" and "feathers" appear very frequently, and many RTKers including myself have grouped them into the meaning of "mattress" (see the character 曜). The problem is that you often don't know in advance what is going to end up getting grouped later on, especially once you move past the scope of RTK1 + RTK3.
I wrote a script to attempt automatic primitive discovery by systematically looking at what radicals are in common between various characters. For example, if you were to input 贅 you would discover that 敖 is a common component of this character and many other characters, and could assign it a new meaning. I'm still messing around with the way Kanji are rated, so it's not perfect or anything.
You can check it out here: http://foosoft.net/cgi-bin/kanji.py
What do you guys think? Cool? Lame? Whatever?


