I've been following this forum for some time. This is my first post. My apologies if I'm repeating old FAQs.
I completed RTK3 this year in preparation for JLPT1. I have seen a few threads about keywords and stories beyond RTK3. Has anyone come up with anything organized and substantial? Since it is unlikely we'll ever see an "official" RTK4, a forum like this one seems the best alternative. I've seen a few kanji lists, and a few one-off kanji and keywords, but nothing more ever comes of it.
If I want to continue learning characters (I realize the value of such is an often debated topic, but I do), I can learn them as I come across them, of course. But a more efficient way that stays true to the Heisig method would be to pool a list and divide them up into chapters based on primitive elements. Then assign the keywords and learn them a chapter at a time. The crucial point would be pooling the list. Obviously the kanken-1 list comes to mind, if one wants to go to 6000.
Has any work to this effect been done? If it hasn't, it hasn't; I'm on my own. But if it has, I would certainly want to refer to it.
Thanks for your help.
I completed RTK3 this year in preparation for JLPT1. I have seen a few threads about keywords and stories beyond RTK3. Has anyone come up with anything organized and substantial? Since it is unlikely we'll ever see an "official" RTK4, a forum like this one seems the best alternative. I've seen a few kanji lists, and a few one-off kanji and keywords, but nothing more ever comes of it.
If I want to continue learning characters (I realize the value of such is an often debated topic, but I do), I can learn them as I come across them, of course. But a more efficient way that stays true to the Heisig method would be to pool a list and divide them up into chapters based on primitive elements. Then assign the keywords and learn them a chapter at a time. The crucial point would be pooling the list. Obviously the kanken-1 list comes to mind, if one wants to go to 6000.
Has any work to this effect been done? If it hasn't, it hasn't; I'm on my own. But if it has, I would certainly want to refer to it.
Thanks for your help.
