Joined: May 2009
Posts: 66
Thanks:
0
I guess another reason is that kana pretty much reviews itself if you're reading anything at all, so if you were to learn the kana today and embark in your RTK pilgrimage, you'd have forgotten the kana by the time you're done (unless you review kana), while if you were to learn it today after learning the kanji, it'd be fresh in your memory and you could start doing sentences or whatever.
I'd have given up if somebody had told me I wouldn't know almost anything about Japanese after two or three months, though.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,944
Thanks:
11
I'm pretty sure Tobberoth was being sarcastic.
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 27
Thanks:
0
Well, lots of different opinions! I think overall I'm convinced that it definitely wouldn't hurt to pause RTK (it's not like I'm very far into it anyway) and learn the Kana first. Since it doesn't take very long anyway, why not? That way when I watch japanese movies, or whatever else, I would stand a better chance of recognizing things, especially as I go deeper and deeper into RTK.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,944
Thanks:
11
Well, I definitely don't think you should do RTK at a point where you don't even know how kanji fit into the Japanese writing system. At the very least you need to read some introduction to the writing system, and I think it would be a good idea to have at least some very basic knowledge of Japanese before doing RTK.
It's not strictly necessary to use RTK, but the questions you're asking about kanji are sort of like someone trying to memorize multiplication tables without knowing what the number symbols are for or what they represent.
Edited: 2010-06-08, 4:30 pm
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,322
Thanks:
0
Oh sorry, yeah, I was being sarcastic. I interpreted Khatz as saying "LRN KANGYS, BCUZ HERGANA AIN'T GOT NO USE!" (which was an incorrect interpretation)
and was sarcastically saying, "DERRR, I AIN'T NEVER SEEN NO HIRAGANA IN REAL LIFE"
Then you posted with a sentence with a ton of kanji, which I interpreted as:
"Your sarcasm implies that you're not exposed to enough Japanese to see how much kanji dominates the writing system" (which was an incorrect interpretation)
So then I responded by saying
"I am exposed to quite a lot of Japanese, especially the handwritten type, where I've seen hiragana being used much, much more often"
in order to prove a point that you already agreed with.
Hmm, it seems recently I'm being misinterpreted a lot. Maybe I should write in a better manner, or add </sarcasm> when it's being used...
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7
Thanks:
0
Hologen, I just want to reassure you a bit on how slowly you feel you're going. I also learned kanji very slowly at first (a non-RTK course though), but then once the patterns became familiar, my pace shot up drastically. The people who are going much faster than you from the start are generally the ones who have already learned some kanji the old-fashioned way before starting the book. Expanding on previous knowledge is much easier than starting from scratch like you are doing.
I agree with Yudantaiteki, who suggested you learn the basics of the writing system before continuing your study.
As for learning the kana, all they are is sounds. You will definitely recognize more characters, but they won't mean much to you until you gain Japanese vocabulary. You would essentially be learning how to pronounce pieces of stuff that means gibberish to you. I can assure you, as someone who learned kana first before everything, the novelty of this wears off very quickly:
"Ooo, that thing there says, 'Something ku something ka ri ma se n.'"
"What does that mean?"
"I have no idea."
I would definitely suggest learning kana either just before or concurrently with grammar/vocabulary. I doubt it matters whether you do this while learning kanji, or after learning kanji. My point is, kana without any vocab is useless.
Edited: 2010-06-09, 3:39 am
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 27
Thanks:
0
I haven't actually started the kana yet. Waiting for my next day off to devote a good chunk of time to it and not feel rushed. I took a peak at Heisig's remember the Kana, read the introduction, was a bit baffled when he wrote that I would learn it in three hours, as I looked at the pages I thought "Yeah right." But hopefully it will be easier than it looks. Everything LOOKS difficult before you figure out how it works, and then you think "I can't believe I ever thought this looked difficult." So I guess I just gotta keep the right attitude and not defeat myself.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,851
Thanks:
0
3 hours is a pretty common time for the kana, even without RTKana. I did it just by trying to write the whole set from memory, restarting from scratch every time I forgot one. No RTKana or mnemonics..
That is of course just to get them into your head, you're going to need review by actually using them in practice too. If you're note starting real Japanese learning until after RTK, then you should SRS them (both ways) though.
Edited: 2010-06-09, 8:52 am
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,851
Thanks:
0
I've never heard of someone mixing up katakana with hiragana. People often forget some katakana since it's not used nearly as often though.
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 27
Thanks:
0
So I was just wondering, if any of you guys come back to read this. Should I just immediately return to Kanji study after I feel that I have a good grasp of the kana? Or sort of tip toe around it and learn some other things first?
Also, would it be a good idea to do pimsleur along with the Kanji? Do any of you think it's a good or bad idea to study two different things simultaneously like that?
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 423
Thanks:
0
Jump right back into kanji, in fact do kanji and kana at the same time.
Do not let up on the kanji monster.
You must TAME the animal and train it to do your bidding.
The sooner the better