Actually, I think there's no harm in the original poster's suggestion. Heisig himself says we should review in some order other than that provided in the book, and a reorganized grouping would constitute such an order. My only suggestion would be that the original poster try to create such a grouping himself, so as to learn it more actively.
Also, I disagree with the claim that the "overwhelming majority" of Heisig's keywords are "pointless." Every day I browse through my kanji dictionary, covering up the translations, to help me review. The majority of the time, the Heisig keyword is one of the main definitions in the dictionary. When that's not the case, it's usually in the ballpark. As Heisig says, the idea is to give us one meaning; once we have that, it's a lot easier to enrich our understanding by adding more. And of course, we have to learn compounds.
Finally, I've been faithfully doing SRS here, but I actually find I learn and retain better if I use paper flash cards and pen-and-paper. (In other words, I'm doing this two ways: as Heisig suggested it, using paper; and using Rev TK.) With paper flash cards, I sit and write each kanji as I test myself. And I create my own primitive SRS, creating stacks of restudy cards and stacks of easy ones. By contrast, with RevTK, I "write" the kanji on my palm, and that's not as good practice. Also, with Rev TK, I find I spend less time fixing my own story in my mind, and more time rather passively accepting other people's stories. Now, RevTK does a great job of spaced repetition, so I plan to continue it; and now that I have two shoeboxes of cards, I can't bring them everywhere to study. But I guess I would also say to the original poster: there's nothing wrong with just using old-fashioned flash cards, and reviewing the tougher ones more often.
Also, I disagree with the claim that the "overwhelming majority" of Heisig's keywords are "pointless." Every day I browse through my kanji dictionary, covering up the translations, to help me review. The majority of the time, the Heisig keyword is one of the main definitions in the dictionary. When that's not the case, it's usually in the ballpark. As Heisig says, the idea is to give us one meaning; once we have that, it's a lot easier to enrich our understanding by adding more. And of course, we have to learn compounds.
Finally, I've been faithfully doing SRS here, but I actually find I learn and retain better if I use paper flash cards and pen-and-paper. (In other words, I'm doing this two ways: as Heisig suggested it, using paper; and using Rev TK.) With paper flash cards, I sit and write each kanji as I test myself. And I create my own primitive SRS, creating stacks of restudy cards and stacks of easy ones. By contrast, with RevTK, I "write" the kanji on my palm, and that's not as good practice. Also, with Rev TK, I find I spend less time fixing my own story in my mind, and more time rather passively accepting other people's stories. Now, RevTK does a great job of spaced repetition, so I plan to continue it; and now that I have two shoeboxes of cards, I can't bring them everywhere to study. But I guess I would also say to the original poster: there's nothing wrong with just using old-fashioned flash cards, and reviewing the tougher ones more often.
