Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,289
Thanks:
0
That is actually the first Japanese grammar I learned in the good old days. I don't know if I would recommend it, if someone finds Tae Kim too much, they will definitely have issues learning Japanese.
It's not bad, but it IS very simple and non-comprehensive.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 427
Thanks:
0
I don't even know how Tae Kim is too thorough. It's just not what I would imagine when someone mentions the word.
Maybe the overwhelming part comes from a lack of balance between usage and rules. That is observing how a rule is used, making points less abstract.
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 391
Thanks:
0
This is great. My brain has an unfortunate revulsion to the G, but this looks digestible enough.