Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,049
Thanks:
4
What exactly do you mean by a map of them?
You mean a list of all the KO2001 kanji along with the RTK keywords for each one?
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,313
Thanks:
22
In group projects is a sticky to Google Documents. In there is a spreadsheet that lists Kanji with RTK, KO2001, Kanken and other numbers. Good reference to build your own deck.
Edited: 2010-02-06, 2:44 am
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 316
Thanks:
0
Can I ask something unrelated: After a year of finishing RTK, how many reviews per day have you got left (approximately)?
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 576
Thanks:
0
Could you share that? I would be intereted in try it out. I too have gotten bored with simple RTK deck, and have been interested in trying the japaense keyword approach. A matched to KO deck woud be intersting to try.
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 239
Thanks:
0
Sure once complete. I have been swamped with work/life and as a result, my Japanese studies are down to 10-15 mins per day; most of which are on my phone. I have added no new material and felt that my RTK reviews should offer a little more.
Enter RTK lite. My first idea was to use RTK lite and swap out English keywords for Japanese keywords. Then I thought why not use KO2001 kanji - should be about the same as RTK lite kanji. I started KO2001 last year and only got to around 200 kanji into it before I stopped adding new sentences to my deck
My ideas are that I will able to:
- Produce most Kanji, I don't mind not being able to produce all Kanji; sides I have been through RTK 1 completely and reviewed for almost a year. If I feel a character warrants inclusion into my holy set, I will add them
- Guess the pronunciation, which right now is not being exercised with my current RTK deck
- Expand vocabulary. This is minor, since KO2001 does that just fine.
- Drop some of the inane keywords that I just don't get and use real Japanese words,
- Focus on important Kanji. This is a tough one for me, since I believe all Kanji are important. The point here is - the important Kanji that I should be able to produce.
Over time, I think this deck might evolve to a general vocabulary deck where you are tested on the hiragana word and must produce the kanji (or kanji sequence); a J-J deck. My thoughts on this are a bit unclear.