Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,289
Thanks:
0
Tae Kim. The other sources demand you know basic grammar, which is exactly what Tae Kim teaches you. Read his explanations and mine his sentences (if you feel the need to, most basic Japanese grammar will be stuck in your head in no-time regardless) and then move on to any of the other sources.
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 101
Thanks:
0
I'm a big fan of Kanjidamage (also the blog of Schultz, the guy who wrote it, is hilarious), but it's not something to do after RTK--you do it instead of RTK. So you can cross that off the list!
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 47
Thanks:
0
Thanks, I'll probably go Tae Kim then. Does that mean after Tae Kim, I'll probably be free to choose where I go next after that? Or is it recommendable to go vocab first?
I'm still a bit aggrieved after reading Kanjidamage once again, since if I had done that properly, I would have gotten all the onyomis and some of the keigo in one go. :p
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 252
Thanks:
2
敬語? Don't you mean 訓読み, or am I missing something?
On subject,
I went RtK 1 -> Core 2000, since I had already read Tae Kim and had a pretty good grasp of basic grammar, verb conjugation, that sort of thing. Not enough to generate it, but enough to understand and look up the things that don't immediately come to mind. If that doesn't describe you, Tae Kim is the logical next step.
Next, I could review Tae Kim with Nukemarine's deck, but I'm going to focus on deepening my current vocabulary by studying monolingual definitions.
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 488
Thanks:
0
Tae Kim's grammar guide is the best of its kind currently available, but after that it's basically up to you. Try sentences. Try vocab. Go with whichever one works best for you.
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 55
Thanks:
0
If you're going the vocab route there's no reason you can't do both. In fact it might help, since you won't be going through Tae Kim as fast you might absorb some of the info better. At least that's what I'm trying to do. Even though I'll be coming back to reference Tae Kim I feel that if I try to just read it all as fast as I can I'm not going to retain as much.
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 78
Thanks:
5
I'd recommend UBJG. I'm not too far into the book, but it literally follows the i+1 method in everything I've covered. For each new grammar concept you get around ten example sentences, each usually containing one or two new pieces of vocabulary. There's also constant reinforcement of what you've already learned. I'm really digging it.
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,313
Thanks:
22
I thought the common consensus was do one or the other, as it's pretty much the same result. Core2k uses easier and shorter sentences than KO, but Core2k has a horrible word order.
Now, if you can sort the Core 2k list into a version of the KO order, you might have a winning system (Core sentences with simpler sentences and audio, but KO's more intuitive word order). A program that can do that should be in those threads mentioned.
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 55
Thanks:
0
I realized that when I had experimented with frequency ordering the Core2k list I had only imported the first step (200 sentences). So as an experiment I imported all 10 steps into a deck and did a frequency ordering on the whole thing. If you are really wanting a gentle introduction of kanji this is certainly the way to go. The difference is night and day with the original order (or lack thereof).
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 47
Thanks:
0
I don't really understand how to actually run the program correctly (installed Perl and stuff but is still lost), so I guess I'll go from the KO2001 deck.
I guess I'll try and sort the decks later on when I'm in the right state of mind.
Question just so I don't get lost: a simple yes/no will do.
In the KO2001 anki deck, when the question card shows the sentence as well as the kanji, all I need to do in there is just read the whole sentence and understand the meaning of the sentence (and the words), right?
I also tried the smart.fm deck finally (Firefox gives errors for that so finally used Chrome to open it), and any opinions on how good it is compared to KO2001?
Edited: 2009-12-25, 12:20 am
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,313
Thanks:
22
Intermu,
Yes, if you set up your cards to show a kanji sentence, then the idea is to be able to read outloud the entire sentence, understand what it says as a whole and what each of the individual words mean.
A variant that I do is either bold a word or have it displayed off to the side that I want that sentence to help me learn. That's the word I write down if I do not read or understand that word correctly.
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 8
Thanks:
0
Kanji compounds in TRK?
I'm not sure if this is the right thread to be asking this question, but I'm on 670 kanji using RTK 1. And I know that there is still some time to go before I finish, but I am curious to know how to study compunds? Does RTK 2 teach you compounds? I sometimes learn new compounds that I come across by chance. But I would like to do it the right way from the start. What does the RTK method recommend regarding compunds? And what do you guys recommend?
Thanks in advance for any advice.
:o)
Edited: 2010-01-06, 6:28 am
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 170
Thanks:
0
Start reading the real stuff from now on. If you are uncertain about a grammar point, then whip out your grammar book. Most importantly, study for the long term. If you read a lot, many words will come to you naturally IN THE LONG TERM. I suggest you play around with alc.co.jp. Type in stuff that you want to say, such as :
"I think..."
Or try to see if expressions in English are also in Japanese, such as:
Two birds, one stone.
一石二鳥
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 47
Thanks:
0
Asking another question here again to avoid thread redundancy.
I'm fresh out of RtK, and 300 cards in KO.
Now I'm wondering what did people do when starting out, especially while looking at new jukugo. I'm confronted by new jukugo on some sentences, and whenever I see one of those new jukugos, my first instinct is to link it to Heisig keywords instead of the reading first. Will this be a bad habit for me?
Besides that, I also usually remember the general meaning of the sentence itself, will this fade by as I get in more cards?
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 8
Thanks:
0
Dear wildweathel, Sebastian and mr_hans_moleman
Thank you so much for your helpful answers. You confirm that I should keep going and not worry about how I learn compounds. How refreshing. I needed that. There are so many great words out there to learn. And now I don't have to feel guilty about learning them even though I haven't finished RTK 1. Wow, I can start having the dessert allready!
Thank you.
:o)
Louise
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,674
Thanks:
1
原子力発電所
著作権侵害
沖縄開発庁長官
衆議院議員
原子力潜水艦
Food for thought.
Edited: 2010-01-08, 3:52 pm