Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 419
Thanks:
0
yes and no....
if you re short I think Kanzen (and I assume Unicom) is a great help to improve in a short time . Through this training what you lack in raw power you make it up in technique . Kanzen has some great advice and a good variety of text (in some case probably harder than the JLPT)
On the long run obviously nothing beats regular reading.
that s the price of the reading raw power
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,022
Thanks:
1
I did JLPT2 in San Francisco. Overall I think I did well. There were a couple of words on the vocab test that I've never seen, but the listening section was easier than past years, and grammar seemed easier too. Reading was OK; it was the first time I had enough time to answer every question on that section.
Edited: 2009-12-06, 8:14 pm
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 419
Thanks:
0
did you take the test ?
yellow card means OUT.
you still can take the test but official are supposed to take you out to warn you.
So the time you gain is lost in being scolded
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 419
Thanks:
0
everyone tooking the 1kyuu test reports their class was laughing their guts out when they heard the evangelion question.
as for me , I m pretty sure one of the official put a paper in front of this mouth to hide the fact she was laughing too.
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 419
Thanks:
0
BTW is there anyone here with a decent chinese?
I m pretty sure the last part missing has been uploaded on a chinese website but I just cant get myself registred . neworld.jp
It sucks because I spent this morning counting my point and all my chances relies on a good score at reading . I think I ll succeed if I have at least 76 pourcents of good answer at reading .
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 99
Thanks:
0
I sat JLPT1 in Sydney yesterday.
Characters & Vocab: not too bad, had to guess a few but wasn't much harder compared to any of the past exams (with the notable exception of 2007).
Listening: I found this much harder than the past exams (about as hard as 2007, which was the hardest, according to the released stats). To top it off, I messed up question 4 of the first part (the one with the kids and social behaviour) cause it took up a full page, and I mistook it to be two separate questions. I realised the error of my ways two questions after that, when things weren't make _any_ sense at all. It wasn't a great confidence building exercise. Listening part 2 was alright, though -- I found it to be surprisingly easier than part 1. And yes, I chuckled at the last question (no, I don't watch Evangelion or whatever it was from, I just found it downright corny).
Grammar: I did this before the reading section. Doing lots of drills and chewing through 3 separate grammar books before the test really helped me with this part. There were a couple of unfamiliar ones, but I had this section behind me in about 20 min.
Reading: I found the actual reading articles to be easier than expected. Most of the entries in the supplied word list were either easy or obvious. The questions themselves, however, I found to be subjective at times. For examples, the one about buying happiness with money -- X) there's a limit to the happiness you can buy with money and Y) there are some forms of happiness that money can't buy. They kind of mean similar things. I ran out of time with 1 question left to go, and ended up guessing it (can't remember which one).
Whatever the result is, I think it will be borderline.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,022
Thanks:
1
I felt like things were going my way because 足がしびれた was on the test and I just learned it the other day. Have to thank my wife for getting pins and needles at the right time.