ファブリス Wrote:Personally I would really recommend to take that extra step, as soon as you run into difficult stories, because you'll find the stories will hold on very well. At least that's been my experience, I feel confident saying so because my recall rate, according to the database, is very good (i.e. over 70% of my cards have 7+ successive positive reviews and 0 failures)... actually it's the best, following one other member (this member has more cards with 0 failures than I, but with less successive reviews).

It would be pretty cool if we were able to see our own stats displayed in the usual slick fashion. I'm sure it's something you're thinking about but I just thought I would mention it anyway. Cheers,

Even if you would let us download stats as raw data to a text file, there are probably members who would be interested in developing some simple application to analyze the data. I for one would sure like to know which stacks my cards are actually in because my review page is starting to look like this:

[ファブリス]

JimmySeal Wrote:Even if you would let us download stats as raw data to a text file

That's something I didn't consider, thanks for the idea. Otherwise I have to design the presentation of the information, consider what to show, what not to show etc.

I too think of downloading whole study area once I'm finished with RtK1. It'll probably be no big deal for server load with spaced requests, but still better with raw (compressed?) data.

RoboTact Wrote:I too think of downloading whole study area once I'm finished with RtK1.

IIRC, this has already been suggested at least once...

But it seems to me that this thread is about something different: the download of only the stats of your cards (and not the whole study area).

If it was possible to export/import the stats for each card, it would be easy to use other programs (Mnemosyne, SuperMemo, Twinkle, ...) for reviewing. After more than 10.000 reviews, I'd really hate to change to another program and start from scratch...

I think that a really neat feature would be to create/download the file for your reviewing program. At least for Twinkle, this should be really easy...

Yeah the bars on my review page look like that as well. Maybe a quick solution is to plot them on some kind of logarithmic scale so a stack of 1 and a stack of 250 don't look identical? I'd prefer that over a review page with eight columns.