Hello everyone! This is my first post here. 
I'm currently trying to do the sentence method without having done RTK 1 first. (I've tried RTK before, and I'll explain why I'm not using it right now further down.) What I'm doing is just (selectively) mining the example sentences and dialogues from the Genki textbooks. I have an Anki deck with two models, one for sentences and one for kanji. I mine the sentences, adding a card for each new kanji that I encounter. My kanji cards show the kanji and I have to be able to write it (with the correct stroke order), but that's it. I don't have to know what the kanji mean and I don't include keywords for them. I started studying this way about a month and a half ago, and I've just finished chapter 15 with 349 sentences and 253 kanji.
I've tried RTK a few times now. I've gotten discouraged each time, either because I've felt silly using Heisig's method, or because I just found that I wasn't progressing fast enough, or because I'd be frustrated that I was learning kanji without knowing any words or compounds that appeared in them but still couldn't write the words that I did know. I became pretty skeptical about it, but then when I found AJATT and this site last winter, I decided to give it another try. I got a couple hundred kanji in, using just this site and the book which I'd gotten out of the library, but then I lost my Internet for several months, so I stopped reviewing and didn't get any further. I ended up just studying using Genki's kanji list.
I had another bad experience over the summer in my Japanese study. My computer crashed, and I lost the Mnemosyne deck that I'd started. I didn't have a working computer for a month, but I realized that the way I'd been studying, mining using primarily kana and only kanji if I'd learned them from my textbook by then, was a really big cop-out. A little after I got a working computer again, about two months ago, I switched to Anki and started using the method I described above. I restarted from the beginning of the book. I ended up covering all the grammar that we're supposed to cover in my class this year in under a month, and found that my reading and writing ability was really improving. I find that I can read all the compounds and words I'm learning elsewhere, although I'm not always able to write them from memory. (But I can always write them if I see the kanji, which I still think is a big improvement.) I realize I still know very few kanji, but I feel like this method is working pretty well, so I think I'm going to continue this way, at least until I finish Genki (which I'm hoping to finish by the end of the month).
So, I'm wondering: do you guys think that this is a sustainable method? I'm not opposed to returning to RTK if I end up really struggling with kanji, but I'm just finding that by just not ignoring them, my reading and writing are really getting better.

I'm currently trying to do the sentence method without having done RTK 1 first. (I've tried RTK before, and I'll explain why I'm not using it right now further down.) What I'm doing is just (selectively) mining the example sentences and dialogues from the Genki textbooks. I have an Anki deck with two models, one for sentences and one for kanji. I mine the sentences, adding a card for each new kanji that I encounter. My kanji cards show the kanji and I have to be able to write it (with the correct stroke order), but that's it. I don't have to know what the kanji mean and I don't include keywords for them. I started studying this way about a month and a half ago, and I've just finished chapter 15 with 349 sentences and 253 kanji.
I've tried RTK a few times now. I've gotten discouraged each time, either because I've felt silly using Heisig's method, or because I just found that I wasn't progressing fast enough, or because I'd be frustrated that I was learning kanji without knowing any words or compounds that appeared in them but still couldn't write the words that I did know. I became pretty skeptical about it, but then when I found AJATT and this site last winter, I decided to give it another try. I got a couple hundred kanji in, using just this site and the book which I'd gotten out of the library, but then I lost my Internet for several months, so I stopped reviewing and didn't get any further. I ended up just studying using Genki's kanji list.
I had another bad experience over the summer in my Japanese study. My computer crashed, and I lost the Mnemosyne deck that I'd started. I didn't have a working computer for a month, but I realized that the way I'd been studying, mining using primarily kana and only kanji if I'd learned them from my textbook by then, was a really big cop-out. A little after I got a working computer again, about two months ago, I switched to Anki and started using the method I described above. I restarted from the beginning of the book. I ended up covering all the grammar that we're supposed to cover in my class this year in under a month, and found that my reading and writing ability was really improving. I find that I can read all the compounds and words I'm learning elsewhere, although I'm not always able to write them from memory. (But I can always write them if I see the kanji, which I still think is a big improvement.) I realize I still know very few kanji, but I feel like this method is working pretty well, so I think I'm going to continue this way, at least until I finish Genki (which I'm hoping to finish by the end of the month).
So, I'm wondering: do you guys think that this is a sustainable method? I'm not opposed to returning to RTK if I end up really struggling with kanji, but I'm just finding that by just not ignoring them, my reading and writing are really getting better.

