Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 231
Thanks:
0
Siiiick
||||||||||凹[◎凸◎;]凹||||||||||
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,558
Thanks:
0
Sunflower seed oil futures!
Trust you Nestor to have the theoretical physics perspective. :-)
I'm happy for the guy - he got some bad press after that little victory gesture was taken in a bad way.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,022
Thanks:
1
You know when you've been studying Japanese too long, when you start to compare beautiful acts of human achievement, to cramming for JLPT1.
I'm a Tyson Gay fan so kind of bummed about Bolt's dominance over him lately. America has reigned over sprinting events for the past 70 years but it looks to be changing now.
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,582
Thanks:
0
I can't wait till the Olympics do away with gender and nationality, and we have the technology to just instantly scan someone's body for their overall health, running computer simulations of every possible movement and scenario a human could physically go through to see who's the 'best'--except it wouldn't be for the 'best', since you'd either have a digital vacuum w/o no recognized variables, or you'd impose arbitrary reference points which would by necessity render the measurements unfair to those whose reality doesn't match the artificial boundaries.
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,313
Thanks:
22
Bflatnine, you're right. Bolt, Woods, Jordan, Tom Cruise, etc. are the best in their areas and are paid millions for it. In such cases, being the best equates to a generous lifestyle. Same goes with your historical examples that equated to improvement on our artistic or scientific communities at large.
Then again, you have some historical examples of the generalist such as Da Vinci or Thomas Jefferson or Buckminster Fullerin that excelled at many areas in part because they called upon expertise in the other areas.
Seeking continuance improvement in many areas or even specific areas should be sought. Hopefully, one can enjoy a lifestyle based on those choices.
So, while I would not call Bolt "The World's Greatest Athlete", I would call him the "Currently World's Greatest Athlete at 100m Sprint". With that, I'm not looking down on his accomplishments, but I'm not giving it more credit than it deserves either. And in the end, he'd still be able to buy and sell me 8 times over which puts the value of my opinion of him in perspective.
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 489
Thanks:
0
Ability/training does not exist in a vacuum that only allows it to relate directly to the one specific task you have made a goal. Someone that has trained their butt off to be the best in the world at one specific thing has actually increased their overall potential for countless other endeavors.
Also, using one's ability for one specific goal and only being good at one specific goal are two very different things. Sure Bolt might "only" be the #1 in the world at a very specific thing (short distance running) but you'd have to be pretty ignorant to believe that those abilities wouldn't translate over to other athletics tasks. I'm willing to bet Mr. Bolt has a more well rounded athletic ability than 95% of the male population on planet earth WHILE also being the fastest short distance runner ever.