Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,674
Thanks:
1
So I was reading the re-examining your work flow thread and I'd kinda done some of the same things to speed up my studies... After reading the full post I was pretty interested to see KO2001 was able to be knocked out in a month! So I thought i'd give it a go...
Im going to be starting on Monday the 10th of August. It will probably take me about 1.5 - 2 months to finish knowing me. But I really wanna try for it in 1! The aim is take myself from 3kyuu to 2kyuu reading level. I've got the time so why on earth not?
I figure after completion is when I'm going to start working on output as a skill as well as taking myself from 2kyuu reading to 1kyuu.
Thoughts, ideas, tips, encouragements, "why oh why's?", flames, fluency debates, AJATT debates, iKnow vs KO2001 debates, price of fish, Input?
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,533
Thanks:
0
The only thing you need to ask yourself is: Could you do something better with your time?
Personally, I find it to be a lot more fun, and therefore more likely I'll keep up with it, if I read manga for the majority of my study time.
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 536
Thanks:
0
Just a little tip:
KO2001 has a learning curve. I´m currently working through it, and it´s hard in the beginning. At least it was, and still is, for me. It´s getting easier though, you get in a groove and start to improve your speed and study-habits.
Don´t get discouraged if you think you´re going slow in the beginning... It´ll get easier!
(At least that´s what blackmacros told me, when I was whining about my slow pace, hehe!)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 364
Thanks:
0
I've been at it for bloody ages! I'm too scared to add more cards before I perfect the other ones, lest I get snowed under by reviews -_-
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 364
Thanks:
0
^Thanks for the advice Tobberoth. It just seems that even though I'm reviewing everything with reasonably good ratings, the same number pops up every day regardless!
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 36
Thanks:
0
I wish I could do KO2001 in a month. Sadly, 5 kanji a day seems to be the magic number for me as that's about the rate at which my brain is able to internalize the readings. For those of you who can get through it super fast, you have my admiration and envy.
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 736
Thanks:
0
There's a thread somewhere on this forum that simulates Anki's algorithm to figure out the number of reviews, and the code and math is explained there.
But seriously you guys are thinking too much. Just do as much reviewing as your daily schedule allows, and add cards when you run low on reviews. You'll have far more success with this than trying to stick to any artificial schedule. It's fine to challenge yourself--"let's see if I can keep up 50 new cards a day for a week!" But don't get too wrapped up in it. And for heaven's sake, don't go working out the calculus of variations that will tell you your optimum study schedule, albeit with some very big, unrealistic assumptions, when you could spend that time studying.
Edited: 2009-08-08, 12:16 pm
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 723
Thanks:
0
KO can be quite difficult initially because, for someone coming in at essentially 0 prior knowledge, the density of new words per sentence can make it quite hard. By the time you get through a few hundred kanji though (around ~160 for me) this problem slowly dissapears as there are no longer large amounts of unknown words per sentence. For you it will probably be much easier, as you shouldn't have as much trouble with too many unknown words in the beginning.
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 68
Thanks:
0
One month seems impossible for me, since I'm doing dictation as well (I only write down the relevant part of the sentence). I'm thinking about dropping the dictation part for the second volume though... it takes a hell of a lot of time compared to just doing recognition. But the result of doing dictation really seems very useful to me. Listening comprehension + being able to write the words, a skill you don't gain from just reading.
It just feels like my fellow RTKers leave me in the dust with the recognition only approach... ^^'
Edited: 2009-08-08, 5:52 am
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 70
Thanks:
0
Just out of curiosity, how do you guys go about studying KO2001? So far what I've been doing is I read through all the sentences once, then i write out all the sentences, and then I go through them and try to read what I wrote. It doesn't seem to be the fastest, nor the best for memorizing vocab, so I was wondering how exactly you guys go about getting the sentences/vocab in your head before you actually put them in your SRS.
Also, when you put them in your SRS, what do you mark them as (assuming you use anki) at first. It seems like unless I spend a lot of time on each sentence, or study them once in the morning and once at night, I'm not able to remember them the next time they come up in anki. Any advice?
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 70
Thanks:
0
Ah thank you Tobberoth, adding extra sentences for certain words is definitely something I can do that'll help in the beginning, especially because at the moment each sentence is at majority new vocab, if not completely. Looks like for now I'll just have to take it slow, add lots of extra sentences, and just pray the SRS does it's thing haha.
Although I suppose trying Iverson's method on top of that couldn't hurt...
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,674
Thanks:
1
I beleive writing is a very important skill in any language despite how little it is used. However, it takes ages to do reviews outputting writing. The idea of breaking learning up into layers has worked really well for heisig so I'm guessing it should work just as well for the rest of literacy. That is to say, once you've learned how to read, learning how to write will be easier. I think this would be very true because you know all the readings and how they're used in kanji compounds. If you learn how to write while learning how to read, you don't have that background knowledge and in my experience it's an uphill battle to get it. One could learn to read much faster if just reading was focused on, then you can move on to all forms of output.